OPTIMAL POSE SELECTION FOR IN-SITU FABRICATION OF PLANAR MECHANISMS

Solid Freeform Fabrication (SFF) techniques allow the insitu fabrication of fully-assembled devices with mating/tting parts. Recently, this technique of fabrication has been found to be useful for building integrated mechanisms in robotics, and a wide array of other similar applications are anticipated. An interesting issue that arises during the fabrication of such mechanisms is the determination of an optimal pose in which the mechanism should be built. For example, should the mechanism be built in a folded or stretched-out position? In conventional manufacturing these issues do not arise, as each individual link is typically manufactured separately and then the pieces are brought together during assembly. In this paper, we address the issue of nding a preferred (or optimal) pose for in-situ fabrication of planar mechanisms. There are many factors (e.g. achievable tolerances, non-interference, workspace size limitations, thermal considerations etc.) which can determine the suitability of a candidate build pose so that pre-specied task requirements are met. We limit our analysis to nding the optimal build conguration given achievable (in general, non-homogeneous, anisotropic) accuracy on joint position. For this treatment, we also make the simplifying assumption that the task requirements can be best satised by minimizing variability of link-lengths. Alternate task requirements, for example, maintaining end-point accuracy within a tolerance region, are being considered as part of ongoing work. We cast the problem of minimizing variability in link length as that of determining the relative position of two location tolerance regions for which the dierence between their extremal distances is at a minimum (i.e., as they undergo constrained relative motion

[1]  Michael J. Cima,et al.  Three Dimensional Printing: Rapid Tooling and Prototypes Directly from a CAD Model , 1992 .

[2]  Mark R. Cutkosky,et al.  TOLERANCE REPRESENTATION FOR MECHANISM ASSEMBLIES IN LAYERED MANUFACTURING , 1998 .

[3]  R. Merz,et al.  Shape Deposition Manufacturing , 1994 .

[4]  Leo Joskowicz,et al.  Kinematic tolerance analysis , 1997, Comput. Aided Des..

[5]  Leo Joskowicz,et al.  A representation language for mechanical behavior , 1996, Artif. Intell. Eng..

[6]  Godfried T. Toussaint,et al.  Efficient Algorithms for Computing the Maximum Distance Between Two Finite Planar Sets , 1983, J. Algorithms.

[7]  Aristides A. G. Requicha,et al.  Toward a Theory of Geometric Tolerancing , 1983 .

[8]  R. Merz,et al.  Shape Deposition Manufacturing of Wearable Computers , 1996 .

[9]  Kristin L. Wood,et al.  Geometric tolerancing in mechanical design using fractal-based parameters , 1995 .

[10]  Vincent Hayward,et al.  Calibration of a parallel robot using multiple kinematic closed loops , 1994, Proceedings of the 1994 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[11]  Jean-Claude Latombe,et al.  Robot motion planning , 1970, The Kluwer international series in engineering and computer science.

[12]  Leonard M. Blumenthal,et al.  Theory and applications of distance geometry , 1954 .

[13]  Jon M. Kleinberg,et al.  On dynamic Voronoi diagrams and the minimum Hausdorff distance for point sets under Euclidean motion in the plane , 1992, SCG '92.

[14]  Vijay Srinivasan,et al.  Geometric Tolerancing: I. Virtual Boundary Requirements , 1989, IBM J. Res. Dev..

[15]  Michael Ian Shamos,et al.  Computational geometry: an introduction , 1985 .