Exploring structural variability in X-ray crystallographic models using protein local optimization by torsion-angle sampling.

Modeling structural variability is critical for understanding protein function and for modeling reliable targets for in silico docking experiments. Because of the time-intensive nature of manual X-ray crystallographic refinement, automated refinement methods that thoroughly explore conformational space are essential for the systematic construction of structurally variable models. Using five proteins spanning resolutions of 1.0-2.8 A, it is demonstrated how torsion-angle sampling of backbone and side-chain libraries with filtering against both the chemical energy, using a modern effective potential, and the electron density, coupled with minimization of a reciprocal-space X-ray target function, can generate multiple structurally variable models which fit the X-ray data well. Torsion-angle sampling as implemented in the Protein Local Optimization Program (PLOP) has been used in this work. Models with the lowest R(free) values are obtained when electrostatic and implicit solvation terms are included in the effective potential. HIV-1 protease, calmodulin and SUMO-conjugating enzyme illustrate how variability in the ensemble of structures captures structural variability that is observed across multiple crystal structures and is linked to functional flexibility at hinge regions and binding interfaces. An ensemble-refinement procedure is proposed to differentiate between variability that is a consequence of physical conformational heterogeneity and that which reflects uncertainty in the atomic coordinates.

[1]  David J. Chen,et al.  The Binding Interface between an E2 (UBC9) and a Ubiquitin Homologue (UBL1)* , 1999, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[2]  Axel T. Brunger,et al.  Thermal Motion and Conformational Disorder in Protein Crystal Structures: Comparison of Multi‐Conformer and Time‐Averaging Models , 1994 .

[3]  Ronald M. Levy,et al.  The SGB/NP hydration free energy model based on the surface generalized born solvent reaction field and novel nonpolar hydration free energy estimators , 2002, J. Comput. Chem..

[4]  Michael Nilges,et al.  The impact of protein flexibility on protein–protein docking , 2004, Proteins.

[5]  Alexandre M J J Bonvin,et al.  Flexible protein-protein docking. , 2006, Current opinion in structural biology.

[6]  AC Tose Cell , 1993, Cell.

[7]  William F. DeGrado,et al.  How calmodulin binds its targets: sequence independent recognition of amphiphilic α-helices , 1990 .

[8]  B. Honig,et al.  A hierarchical approach to all‐atom protein loop prediction , 2004, Proteins.

[9]  Axel T Brunger,et al.  Molecular dynamics applied to X-ray structure refinement. , 2002, Accounts of chemical research.

[10]  F. Young Biochemistry , 1955, The Indian Medical Gazette.

[11]  J. Davies,et al.  Molecular Biology of the Cell , 1983, Bristol Medico-Chirurgical Journal.

[12]  P. Adams,et al.  Annealing in crystallography: a powerful optimization tool. , 1999, Progress in biophysics and molecular biology.

[13]  Heather A Carlson,et al.  Exploring experimental sources of multiple protein conformations in structure-based drug design. , 2007, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[14]  D. Koshland,et al.  CORRELATION OF STRUCTURE AND FUNCTION IN ENZYME ACTION. , 1963, Science.

[15]  J. Hulten,et al.  Synthesis and comparative molecular field analysis (CoMFA) of symmetric and nonsymmetric cyclic sulfamide HIV-1 protease inhibitors. , 2001, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[16]  P. Rejto,et al.  Protein conformational substates from X-ray crystallography. , 1996, Progress in biophysics and molecular biology.

[17]  Christopher D. Lima,et al.  Structural Basis for E2-Mediated SUMO Conjugation Revealed by a Complex between Ubiquitin-Conjugating Enzyme Ubc9 and RanGAP1 , 2002, Cell.

[18]  A. W. Pryor,et al.  Thermal vibrations in crystallography , 1975 .

[19]  X. Zou,et al.  Ensemble docking of multiple protein structures: Considering protein structural variations in molecular docking , 2006, Proteins.

[20]  T. N. Bhat,et al.  The Protein Data Bank , 2000, Nucleic Acids Res..

[21]  P Gros,et al.  Inclusion of thermal motion in crystallographic structures by restrained molecular dynamics. , 1990, Science.

[22]  R. Friesner,et al.  Novel procedure for modeling ligand/receptor induced fit effects. , 2006, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[23]  R. Friesner,et al.  Generalized Born Model Based on a Surface Integral Formulation , 1998 .

[24]  Jianpeng Ma,et al.  Normal-mode refinement of anisotropic thermal parameters for potassium channel KcsA at 3.2 A crystallographic resolution. , 2007, Structure.

[25]  M Karplus,et al.  Effect of anisotropy and anharmonicity on protein crystallographic refinement. An evaluation by molecular dynamics. , 1986, Journal of molecular biology.

[26]  R. Rosenfeld Nature , 2009, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[27]  M Karplus,et al.  Relation between sequence and structure of HIV-1 protease inhibitor complexes: a model system for the analysis of protein flexibility. , 2002, Journal of molecular biology.

[28]  J. Zou,et al.  Improved methods for building protein models in electron density maps and the location of errors in these models. , 1991, Acta crystallographica. Section A, Foundations of crystallography.

[29]  M. DePristo,et al.  Heterogeneity and inaccuracy in protein structures solved by X-ray crystallography. , 2004, Structure.

[30]  John Kuriyan,et al.  Exploration of disorder in protein structures by X‐ray restrained molecular dynamics , 1991, Proteins.

[31]  A Perrakis,et al.  Crystal Structure of Murine/Human Ubc9 Provides Insight into the Variability of the Ubiquitin-conjugating System* , 1997, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[32]  G. G. Stokes "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[33]  Ruth Nussinov,et al.  Principles of docking: An overview of search algorithms and a guide to scoring functions , 2002, Proteins.

[34]  J. L. Smith,et al.  Structural heterogeneity in protein crystals. , 1986, Biochemistry.

[35]  Turkan Haliloglu,et al.  Cooperative fluctuations of unliganded and substrate‐bound HIV‐1 protease: A structure‐based analysis on a variety of conformations from crystallography and molecular dynamics simulations , 2003, Proteins.

[36]  R. Friesner,et al.  Long loop prediction using the protein local optimization program , 2006, Proteins.

[37]  George N Phillips,et al.  Ensemble refinement of protein crystal structures: validation and application. , 2007, Structure.

[38]  A Wlodawer,et al.  Structure of complex of synthetic HIV-1 protease with a substrate-based inhibitor at 2.3 A resolution. , 1989, Science.

[39]  Haruki Nakamura,et al.  Announcing the worldwide Protein Data Bank , 2003, Nature Structural Biology.

[40]  M. DePristo,et al.  Ab initio construction of polypeptide fragments: Accuracy of loop decoy discrimination by an all‐atom statistical potential and the AMBER force field with the Generalized Born solvation model , 2003, Proteins.

[41]  Z. Xiang,et al.  On the role of the crystal environment in determining protein side-chain conformations. , 2002, Journal of molecular biology.

[42]  P. Weiner,et al.  Temperature-dependent molecular dynamics and restrained X-ray refinement simulations of a Z-DNA hexamer. , 1986, Journal of molecular biology.

[43]  P. Bradley,et al.  High-resolution structure prediction and the crystallographic phase problem , 2007, Nature.

[44]  Jan Hermans,et al.  Promise of advances in simulation methods for protein crystallography: implicit solvent models, time-averaging refinement, and quantum mechanical modeling. , 2003, Methods in enzymology.

[45]  M. Tatham,et al.  Role of an N-terminal site of Ubc9 in SUMO-1, -2, and -3 binding and conjugation. , 2003, Biochemistry.

[46]  R. Friesner,et al.  Evaluation and Reparametrization of the OPLS-AA Force Field for Proteins via Comparison with Accurate Quantum Chemical Calculations on Peptides† , 2001 .

[47]  M. Karplus,et al.  Crystallographic R Factor Refinement by Molecular Dynamics , 1987, Science.

[48]  J. Thornton,et al.  Conformational changes observed in enzyme crystal structures upon substrate binding. , 2005, Journal of molecular biology.

[49]  Mark A Depristo,et al.  Crystallographic refinement by knowledge-based exploration of complex energy landscapes. , 2005, Structure.

[50]  M. A. Wilson,et al.  The 1.0 A crystal structure of Ca(2+)-bound calmodulin: an analysis of disorder and implications for functionally relevant plasticity. , 2000, Journal of molecular biology.

[51]  Y. Yuan,et al.  Conformational flexibility of a ubiquitin conjugation enzyme (E2). , 1999, Biochemistry.