where ψ is the complex probability amplitude vector (belongs to an Hilbet space of finite or infinite dimension), H0 is the free Hamiltonian and H1 is the Hamiltonian associated to the scalar control u (corresponding to a classical electro-magnetic field). We discuss here the controllability and/or the following motion planning problem: for two pure states, ψa and ψb of free energy Eb and Eb (H0ψa = Eaψa and H0ψb = Ebψb), find an open-loop control [0, T ] t → u(t) steering the state ψ form ψa at t = 0 to the state ψb at t = T > 0. It seems that according to [10], such motion planning problem is meaning full. In this report, we consider several Hamiltonian H0 and H1: • The 1D harmonic oscillator where ψ(q, t) is an L complex function of q ∈ R the space position, H0 = p/2 + q/2 and H1 = −q. p corresponds to the operator ı/ ∂ ∂q and q to the multiplication by q. • A 1D particle with H0 = p/2 + V (q) and H1 = −q in the quasi-classic approximation ( ≈ 0). • A two states system ψ ∈ C where we exploit the fictitious spin description.
[1]
Philippe Martin,et al.
A Lie-Backlund approach to equivalence and flatness of nonlinear systems
,
1999,
IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..
[2]
A. Messiah.
Quantum Mechanics, Volume II
,
1981
.
[3]
Gabriel Turinici,et al.
Controllable quantities for bilinear quantum systems
,
2000,
Proceedings of the 39th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (Cat. No.00CH37187).
[4]
Claude Le Bris,et al.
Contrôle optimal bilinéaire d'une équation de Schrödinger
,
2000
.
[5]
Ramakrishna,et al.
Controllability of molecular systems.
,
1995,
Physical review. A, Atomic, molecular, and optical physics.
[6]
H. Carr,et al.
The Principles of Nuclear Magnetism
,
1961
.
[7]
Gabriel Turinici,et al.
Contrôlabilité exacte de la population des états propres dans les systèmes quantiques bilinéaires
,
2000
.
[8]
A. Isidori.
Nonlinear Control Systems
,
1985
.