Much ado about SEA/SA monitoring: The performance of English Regional Spatial Strategies, and some German comparisons

Abstract Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) seeks to better integrate environmental considerations into the preparation and decision-making process of plans and programmes with a view to promoting sustainable development. Further to application of the European Directive 2001/42/EC (SEA Directive) in 2004, the body of practical SEA experience, and parallel research, has increased steadily. Yet there is a crucial element of SEA which cannot build on much experience but whose importance will grow over time — namely that of SEA monitoring. The paper explores the application of SEA monitoring for English Regional Spatial Strategies (RSSs). It briefly introduces the role of SEA monitoring and its legal requirements, the English approach of integrating SEA into Sustainability Appraisal (SA) and the nature of the current English Regional Planning context. The main part presents the research findings and discusses how practitioners cope with the challenges of SEA/SA monitoring — with guiding questions: why, what, who, how, when, and with what outcomes? Reflecting that monitoring is just about to start, the paper draws on measures envisaged for monitoring in the SA reports prepared for RSS, and on expert interviews. It identifies monitoring trends and highlights workable approaches as well as shortcomings. For a critical reflection the findings are mirrored briefly with SEA monitoring approaches of German Regional Plans. Although it is still early days for such monitoring, the findings indicate that there is a danger that some of the specific requirements and objectives of SEA/SA monitoring are not fully met, mainly due to insufficient databases, inappropriate institutional conditions and limited personnel and financial resources. Some recommendations are offered in conclusion.

[1]  T. Marshall After Structure Planning: The New Sub-regional Planning in England , 2007 .

[2]  Graham Pinfield,et al.  Strategic environmental assessment and land-use planning , 1992 .

[3]  Angus Morrison-Saunders,et al.  Assessing Impact, Handbook of EIA and SEA Follow-up , 2004 .

[4]  J. Glasson,et al.  Sea and regional planning—overcoming the institutional constraints: some lessons from the EU , 2001 .

[5]  Thomas Fischer,et al.  The Theory and Practice of Strategic Environmental Assessment: Towards a More Systematic Approach , 2007 .

[6]  Thomas Fischer,et al.  What is Wrong with EIA and SEA anyway , 2006 .

[7]  B. Sadler,et al.  Environmental impact assessment training resource manual , 2002 .

[8]  Riki Therivel,et al.  The strategic environmental assessment directive in the UK: 1year onwards , 2006 .

[9]  John Glasson,et al.  Introduction to Environmental Impact Assessment , 1999 .

[10]  Peter Mooney,et al.  WORKSHOP APPROACH TO DEVELOPING OBJECTIVES, TARGETS AND INDICATORS FOR USE IN SEA , 2006 .

[11]  Riki Therivel,et al.  Strategic Environmental Assessment in Action , 2004 .

[12]  William R. Sheate,et al.  Implementing the SEA Directive: sectoral challenges and opportunities for the UK and EU , 2004 .

[13]  Karl I. Gjerstad,et al.  Uncertainty in environmental impact assessment predictions: the need for better communication and more transparency , 2006 .

[14]  E. João,et al.  Implementing Strategic Environmental Assessment , 2005 .

[15]  D. B. Dalal-Clayton,et al.  Strategic Environmental Assessment: A Sourcebook and Reference Guide to International Experience , 2005 .