Enhancing sociability of computer-supported collaborative learning environments

Most computer-supported collaborative learning (CSCL) environments are purely functional, that is, they concentrate on a specific pedagogy. This is not surprising since their design and use is based on educational grounds and is driven by educators, educational technologists and educational researchers. Unfortunately, these functional environments do not always enable collaborative learning because they miss social interaction, a key element in collaborative learning. One approach for stimulating social interaction is using specific pedagogical techniques that enforce collaborative learning. This chapter presents an alternative approach that is based upon an affordance framework for designing sociable collaborative learning environments. This affordance framework is materialized by devices that enhance group awareness for users of CSCL environments.

[1]  N. Lewis.  A dynamic theory of personality , 1935 .

[2]  Wendy A. Kellogg,et al.  The adoption and use of BABBLE: A field study of chat in the workplace , 1999, ECSCW.

[3]  F. Fischer,et al.  Fostering collaborative knowledge construction with visualization tools , 2002 .

[4]  C. Gunawardena,et al.  Social presence as a predictor of satisfaction within a computer‐mediated conferencing environment , 1997 .

[5]  J. J. Gibson.  The theory of affordances , 1977 .

[6]  R. Rice,et al.  Electronic Emotion , 1987 .

[7]  David W. Johnson,et al.  Cooperation and Competition: Theory and Research , 1989 .

[8]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  Designing the User Interface: Strategies for Effective Human-Computer Interaction , 1998 .

[9]  K. Lewin,et al.  Resolving Social Conflicts , 1948 .

[10]  Paul A. Kirschner,et al.  The sociability of computer-supported collaborative learning environment , 2002, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[11]  Oliver Vallée.  The Challenge of Conferencing System Development , 1992 .

[12]  John Short,et al.  The social psychology of telecommunications , 1976 .

[13]  Jakob Nielsen,et al.  Usability engineering , 1997, The Computer Science and Engineering Handbook.

[14]  Hans van Buuren,et al.  Determining Sociability, Social Space, and Social Presence in (A)synchronous Collaborative Groups , 2004, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[15]  A. Hollingshead,et al.  Collaborative learning and computer‐supported groups , 1999 .

[16]  J. Valacich,et al.  Effects of anonymity and evaluative tone on idea generation in computer-mediated groups , 1990 .

[17]  David W. Johnson,et al.  Creative and Critical Thinking Through Academic Controversy , 1993 .

[18]  K. Williams,et al.  Many Hands Make Light the Work: The Causes and Consequences of Social Loafing , 1979 .

[19]  David R. Moore,et al.  Building Interactivity into Web Courses: Tools for Social and Instructional Interaction. , 1998 .

[20]  M. Deutsch.  A Theory of Co-operation and Competition , 1949 .

[21]  Thomas A. Brush,et al.  Embedding cooperative learning into the design of integrated learning systems: Rationale and guidelines , 1998 .

[22]  Geri Gay,et al.  Use of Communication Resources in a Networked Collaborative Design Environment , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[23]  L. Festinger.  Social pressures in informal groups : a study of human factors in housing / by Leon Festinger, Stanley Schachter and Kurt Back , 1950 .

[24]  David W. Johnson,et al.  Learning together and alone: Cooperation, competition, and individualization , 1975 .

[25]  D. Garrison,et al.  Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and computer conferencing in distance education , 2001 .

[26]  David W. Johnson,et al.  Instructional Goal Structure: Cooperative, Competitive, or Individualistic , 1974 .

[27]  E. Wagner.  Interactivity: From Agents to Outcomes. , 1997 .

[28]  John C. Tang,et al.  Work rhythms: analyzing visualizations of awareness histories of distributed groups , 2002, CSCW '02.

[29]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  The Virtual Classroom: Learning Without Limits Via Computer Networks , 1994 .

[30]  Francine Merritt,et al.  Concrete poetry—Verbivocovisual , 1969 .

[31]  William W. Gaver.  Technology affordances , 1991, CHI.

[32]  D. Norman.  The psychology of everyday things , 1990 .

[33]  Judith S. Olson,et al.  Distance Matters , 2000, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[34]  Alan Borning,et al.  Two approaches to casual interaction over computer and video networks , 1991, CHI.

[35]  Paul A. Kirschner,et al.  Can we support CSCL? Educational, social and technological affordances for learning , 2002 .

[36]  A. Collins,et al.  Epistemic Fluency and Constructivist Learning Environments. , 1995 .

[37]  Pierre Dillenbourg,et al.  Over-scripting CSCL: The risks of blending collaborative learning with instructional design , 2002 .

[38]  David W. Johnson,et al.  Cooperation and the Use of Technology , 2007 .

[39]  R. Slavin.  Research on Cooperative Learning: Consensus and Controversy. , 1990 .

[40]  Amy Soller,et al.  Supporting Social Interaction in an Intelligent Collaborative Learning System , 2001 .

[41]  E. Aronson.  The Jigsaw Classroom , 1978 .

[42]  David D. Redell,et al.  Argohalls: adding support for group awareness to the Argo telecollaboration system , 1995, UIST '95.

[43]  Richard L. Daft,et al.  Message Equivocality, Media Selection, and Manager Performance: Implications for Information Systems , 1987, MIS Q..

[44]  Terry Anderson,et al.  Exploring Social Communication in Computer Conferencing , 2002 .

[45]  C. Gunawardena.  Social Presence Theory and Implications for Interaction and Collaborative Learning in Computer Conferences , 1995 .

[46]  William W. Gaver,et al.  AFFORDANCES FOR INTERACTION: THE SOCIAL IS MATERIAL FOR DESIGN , 1996 .

[47]  Simon Hooper,et al.  The effects of group composition on achievement, interaction, and learning efficiency during computer-based cooperative instruction , 1991 .

[48]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  Collaborative Learning In Asynchronous Learning Networks: Building Learning Communities , 1998, WebNet.

[49]  Stellan Ohlsson,et al.  Learning to do and learning to understand : a lesson and a challenge for cognitive modeling , 1996 .

[50]  Saul Greenberg,et al.  Making contact: getting the group communicating with groupware , 1993, COCS '93.

[51]  Paul A. Kirschner,et al.  Identifying the pitfalls for social interaction in computer-supported collaborative learning environments: a review of the research , 2003, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[52]  Robert E. Slavin,et al.  Cooperative learning in teams: State of the art , 1980 .

[53]  David W. Johnson,et al.  Ability and Task Difficulty in Cognitive Psychology , 1981 .

[54]  Colin Potts,et al.  Design of Everyday Things , 1988 .

[55]  Ingrid Mulder,et al.  Assessing group learning and shared understanding in technology-mediated interaction , 2002, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[56]  Ellen D. Wagner,et al.  In Support of a Functional Definition of Interaction , 1994 .

[57]  Shu-Sheng Liaw,et al.  Enhancing interactivity in web-based instruction: A review of the literature , 2000 .

[58]  Alan M. Lesgold,et al.  What Makes Peer Interaction Effective? Modeling Effective Communication in an Intelligent CSCL , 1999 .

[59]  A. King.  Verbal Interaction and Problem-Solving within Computer-Assisted Cooperative Learning Groups , 1989 .

[60]  Pam Northrup,et al.  A Framework for Designing Interactivity into Web-based Instruction. , 2001 .

[61]  N. Kerr,et al.  Dispensability of member effort and group motivation losses: Free-rider effects , 1983 .