An analysis of the qualitative characteristics of management commentary reporting by New Zealand companies

The narrative section of annual reports has considerable value to its user groups, such as financial analysts and investors (Barlett & Chandler 1997; International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) 2006; Tiexiera 2004). This narrative section including chairpersons’/presidents’ statement contains twice the quantity of information than the financial statements section (Smith & Taffler 2000). However, the abundance of information does not necessarily enhance the quality of such information (IASB 2006). This issue of qualitative characteristics has been long foregone by researchers. This issue has attracted the attention of IASB (2006). Following the dearth in research in regard to qualitative characteristics of reporting this paper explores whether investors’ required qualitative characteristics as outlined by the IASB (2006) have been satisfied in the management commentary section of New Zealand companies’ annual reports. Our result suggests that the principal stakeholders’, that is, investors’ qualitative characteristics requirements have been partially met in this section of annual reports. The qualitative characteristic of ‘relevance’ and ‘supportability’ have been satisfied in more annual reports compared to that of ‘balance’ and ‘comparability’.

[1]  J. Courtis.  Readability of annual reports: Western versus Asian evidence , 1995 .

[2]  William R. Scott,et al.  Financial Accounting Theory , 1983 .

[3]  Kittiya Yongvanich,et al.  Extended performance reporting: an examination of the Australian mining industry , 2005 .

[4]  Rasoul H. Tondkar,et al.  Exploring differences in social disclosures internationally: A stakeholder perspective , 2005 .

[5]  James Guthrie,et al.  Human Capital Reporting in a Developing Nation , 2003 .

[6]  Kamalesh Kumar,et al.  Drivers of corporate voluntary disclosure: A framework and empirical evidence from Italy and the United States , 2007 .

[7]  Vivien Beattie,et al.  Impression management: the case of inter-country financial graphs , 2000 .

[8]  R. Roberts,et al.  Determinants of corporate social responsibility disclosure: An application of stakeholder theory , 1992 .

[9]  D. Owen,et al.  Environmental Disclosure in the Annual Reports of British Companies: A Research Note , 1991 .

[10]  Guilherme D. Pires,et al.  Impressions of an annual report: an experimental study , 2004 .

[11]  J. Courtis,et al.  Reading Ease of Bilingual Annual Reports , 2002 .

[12]  S. Bartlett,et al.  THE CORPORATE REPORT AND THE PRIVATE SHAREHOLDER: LEE AND TWEEDIE TWENTY YEARS ON , 1997 .

[13]  Vivien Beattie,et al.  The impact of graph slope on rate of change judgments in corporate reports , 2002 .

[14]  R. Debreceny,et al.  The determinants of Internet financial reporting , 2002 .

[15]  Elaine Sternberg.  The Defects of Stakeholder Theory , 1997 .

[16]  E. Astami,et al.  The voice of Australian chairman , 2006 .

[17]  R. Taffler,et al.  The chairman’s statement ‐ A content analysis of discretionary narrative disclosures , 2000 .

[18]  B. Craven,et al.  Financial reporting on the Internet by leading UK companies , 1999 .

[19]  C. Cowton,et al.  Bringing the environment into bank lending: implications for environmental reporting , 2004 .

[20]  Mark Anthony Clatworthy,et al.  The effect of thematic structure on the variability of annual report readability , 2001 .

[21]  J. Courtis.  Colour as visual rhetoric in financial reporting , 2004 .

[22]  Stephen L Taylor,et al.  The Impact of Statutory Sanctions on the Level and Information Content of Voluntary Corporate Disclosure , 1999 .

[23]  P. Kent,et al.  Voluntary Disclosure of Forward-Looking Earnings Information in Australia , 2003 .

[24]  D. Gadenne,et al.  Do Corporations Perceive Mandatory Publication Of Pollution Information For Key Stakeholders As A Legitimacy Threat , 2003 .

[25]  R. Adler,et al.  Exploring the reliability of social and environmental disclosures content analysis , 1999 .

[26]  N. Ahmad,et al.  Environment disclosure in Malaysia annual reports: A legitimacy theory perspective , 2004 .

[27]  P. Leung,et al.  Cultural impact on Chinese corporate disclosure – a corporate governance perspective , 2006 .

[28]  J. Guthrie,et al.  An Empirical Investigation of Annual Reporting Trends of Intellectual Capital in Sri Lanka , 2005 .

[29]  Vivien Beattie,et al.  A six-country comparison of the use of graphs in annual reports , 2001 .