Soil analysis based on sa,ples withdrawn from different volumes: correlation versus calibration

SSSAJ: Volume 74: Number 3 • May–June 2010 This manuscript has been co-authored by employees of Brookhaven Science Associates, LLC, under Contract no. DE-AC02-98CH10886 with the U.S. Department of Energy. The publisher by accepting the manuscript for publication acknowledges that the U.S. Government retains a non-exclusive, paidup, irrevocable, worldwide license to publish or reproduce the published form of this manuscript, or allow others to do so, for U.S. Government purposes Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 74:812–819 Published online 11 Feb. 2010 doi:10.2136/sssaj2009.0205 Received 28 May 2009. *Corresponding author (lwielo@bnl.gov). © Soil Science Society of America, 5585 Guilford Rd., Madison WI 53711 USA All rights reserved. No part of this periodical may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Permission for printing and for reprinting the material contained herein has been obtained by the publisher. Soil Analysis Based on Samples Withdrawn from Different Volumes: Correlation versus Calibration Soil Chemistry

[1]  J. R. Brown,et al.  Measuring total soil carbon with laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS). , 2001, Journal of environmental quality.

[2]  L. Wielopolski IN SITU NON-INVASIVE SOIL CARBON ANALYSIS: SAMPLE SIZE AND GEOSTATISTICAL CONSIDERATIONS. , 2005 .

[3]  Pierre Goovaerts,et al.  Fine-resolution mapping of soil organic carbon based on multivariate secondary data , 2006 .

[4]  G. Robertson,et al.  Standard soil methods for long-term ecological research , 1999 .

[5]  Rattan Lal,et al.  Soil Degradation in the United States: Extent, Severity, and Trends , 2003 .

[6]  R. B. Jackson,et al.  THE VERTICAL DISTRIBUTION OF SOIL ORGANIC CARBON AND ITS RELATION TO CLIMATE AND VEGETATION , 2000 .

[7]  D. Sampson,et al.  Carbon Sequestration in loblolly pine plantations: Methods, limitations, and research needs for estimating storage pools , 2004 .

[8]  I. Orion,et al.  NON-DESTRUCTIVE SOIL CARBON ANALYZER. , 2004 .

[9]  Eric R. Ziegel,et al.  Quality engineering handbook , 1991 .

[10]  Keith Paustian,et al.  Spatial variability of soil carbon in forested and cultivated sites: implications for change detection. , 2003, Journal of environmental quality.

[11]  R. Bryant,et al.  Sources of Uncertainty Affecting Soil Organic Carbon Estimates in Northern New York , 2003 .

[12]  G. McCarty,et al.  Quantitative Analysis of Agricultural Soils Using near Infrared Reflectance Spectroscopy and a Fibre-Optic Probe , 2001 .

[13]  H. Rogers,et al.  Nondestructive System for Analyzing Carbon in the Soil , 2008 .

[14]  K. Beard,et al.  Detecting Nutrient Pool Changes in Rocky Forest Soils , 2003 .

[15]  Michael H. Ramsey,et al.  Measurement Uncertainty Arising From Sampling: Implications for the Objectives of Geoanalysis† , 1997 .

[16]  Steven F. Oberbauer,et al.  Plant community responses to experimental warming across the tundra biome , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[17]  Jehn-Yih Juang,et al.  Separating the effects of climate and vegetation on evapotranspiration along a successional chronosequence in the southeastern US , 2006 .

[18]  P. Sollins,et al.  Soil carbon and nitrogen. Pools and fractions. , 1999 .

[19]  Charles W. Rice,et al.  Emerging technologies for in situ measurement of soil carbon , 2007 .

[20]  J. Ardö,et al.  Verification of Soil Carbon Sequestration—Sample Requirements , 2004 .

[21]  James B. Reeves,et al.  Near Infrared Reflectance Spectroscopy for the Analysis of Agricultural Soils , 1999 .

[22]  G. Heinemeyer,et al.  Sources of uncertainty , 2008 .