Predicting and Monitoring Upper-Limb Rehabilitation Outcomes Using Clinical and Wearable Sensor Data in Brain Injury Survivors

Objective: Rehabilitation specialists have shown considerable interest for the development of models, based on clinical data, to predict the response to rehabilitation interventions in stroke and traumatic brain injury survivors. However, accurate predictions are difficult to obtain due to the variability in patients’ response to rehabilitation interventions. This study aimed to investigate the use of wearable technology in combination with clinical data to predict and monitor the recovery process and assess the responsiveness to treatment on an individual basis. Methods: Gaussian Process Regression-based algorithms were developed to estimate rehabilitation outcomes (i.e., Functional Ability Scale scores) using either clinical or wearable sensor data or a combination of the two. Results: The algorithm based on clinical data predicted rehabilitation outcomes with a Pearson's correlation of 0.79 compared to actual clinical scores provided by clinicians but failed to model the variability in responsiveness to the intervention observed across individuals. In contrast, the algorithm based on wearable sensor data generated rehabilitation outcome estimates with a Pearson's correlation of 0.91 and modeled the individual responses to rehabilitation more accurately. Furthermore, we developed a novel approach to combine estimates derived from the clinical data and the sensor data using a constrained linear model. This approach resulted in a Pearson's correlation of 0.94 between estimated and clinician-provided scores. Conclusion: This algorithm could enable the design of patient-specific interventions based on predictions of rehabilitation outcomes relying on clinical and wearable sensor data. Significance: This is important in the context of developing precision rehabilitation interventions.

[1]  S. Wolf,et al.  Pilot normative database for the Wolf Motor Function Test. , 2006, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[2]  Gert Kwakkel,et al.  A comparison of two validated tests for upper limb function after stroke: The Wolf Motor Function Test and the Action Research Arm Test. , 2010, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[3]  P. Manganotti,et al.  Long-term levodopa administration in chronic stroke patients. A clinical and neurophysiologic single-blind placebo-controlled cross-over pilot study. , 2009, Restorative neurology and neuroscience.

[4]  J. Krakauer,et al.  Computational neurorehabilitation: modeling plasticity and learning to predict recovery , 2016, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[5]  C. Winstein,et al.  Interrater Reliability of the Wolf Motor Function Test–Functional Ability Scale , 2015, Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair.

[6]  C. Barnes,et al.  Neural plasticity in the ageing brain , 2006, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[7]  E. Taub,et al.  The reliability of the wolf motor function test for assessing upper extremity function after stroke. , 2001, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[8]  J. Pons,et al.  Combining Dopaminergic Facilitation with Robot-Assisted Upper Limb Therapy in Stroke Survivors , 2016, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[9]  Roger Gassert,et al.  A method to qualitatively assess arm use in stroke survivors in the home environment , 2016, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[10]  J. Krakauer,et al.  Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair Inter-individual Variability in the Capacity for Motor Recovery after Ischemic Stroke Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair Additional Services and Information for Inter-individual Variability in the Capacity for Motor Recovery after Ischemic Stroke , 2022 .

[11]  Fran Brander,et al.  Intensive upper limb neurorehabilitation in chronic stroke: outcomes from the Queen Square programme , 2019, Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry.

[12]  Shyamal Patel,et al.  Estimating fugl-meyer clinical scores in stroke survivors using wearable sensors , 2011, 2011 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[13]  E. Bizzi,et al.  Muscle synergy patterns as physiological markers of motor cortical damage , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[14]  M. Alexander,et al.  Traumatic brain injury. Predicting course of recovery and outcome for patients admitted to rehabilitation. , 1994, Archives of neurology.

[15]  J. Krakauer,et al.  Getting Neurorehabilitation Right , 2012, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[16]  Oliver Stegle,et al.  Gaussian Process Robust Regression for Noisy Heart Rate Data , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[17]  Francesca N. Delling,et al.  Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics—2020 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association , 2020, Circulation.

[18]  D. Damiano,et al.  Effects of Dopamine on Motor Recovery and Training in Adults and Children With Nonprogressive Neurological Injuries: A Systematic Review , 2019, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[19]  Paolo Bonato,et al.  Complex Upper-Limb Movements Are Generated by Combining Motor Primitives that Scale with the Movement Size , 2018, Scientific Reports.

[20]  P. Langhorne,et al.  Motor recovery after stroke: a systematic review , 2009, The Lancet Neurology.

[21]  David K Menon,et al.  The chronic and evolving neurological consequences of traumatic brain injury , 2017, The Lancet Neurology.

[22]  Audny Anke,et al.  Arm use in patients with subacute stroke monitored by accelerometry: association with motor impairment and influence on self-dependence. , 2011, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[23]  Bruce H Dobkin,et al.  The Promise of mHealth , 2011, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[24]  S. Wolf,et al.  Forced use of hemiplegic upper extremities to reverse the effect of learned nonuse among chronic stroke and head-injured patients , 1989, Experimental Neurology.

[25]  C. Lang,et al.  Quantifying Real-World Upper-Limb Activity in Nondisabled Adults and Adults With Chronic Stroke , 2015, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[26]  R. Pandey,et al.  Prognostic models for prediction of outcomes after traumatic brain injury based on patients admission characteristics , 2016, Brain injury.

[27]  Shyamal Patel,et al.  A Novel Approach to Monitor Rehabilitation Outcomes in Stroke Survivors Using Wearable Technology , 2010, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[28]  Matthew A Petoe,et al.  Proportional recovery after stroke depends on corticomotor integrity , 2015, Annals of neurology.

[29]  Paolo Bonato,et al.  A novel upper-limb function measure derived from finger-worn sensor data collected in a free-living setting , 2019, PloS one.

[30]  Mark A. Hall,et al.  Correlation-based Feature Selection for Machine Learning , 2003 .

[31]  Majid Sarrafzadeh,et al.  A Prediction Model for Functional Outcomes in Spinal Cord Disorder Patients Using Gaussian Process Regression , 2016, IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics.

[32]  Sungmin Cho,et al.  Transcranial direct current stimulation for the treatment of motor impairment following traumatic brain injury , 2019, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[33]  Cathy J. Price,et al.  Predicting outcome and recovery after stroke with lesions extracted from MRI images , 2013, NeuroImage: Clinical.

[34]  Shyamal Patel,et al.  A wearable computing platform for developing cloud-based machine learning models for health monitoring applications , 2016, 2016 38th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC).

[35]  P. Heuschmann,et al.  Levodopa improves procedural motor learning in chronic stroke patients. , 2008, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[36]  J. Eng,et al.  Exploring the Role of Accelerometers in the Measurement of Real World Upper-Limb Use After Stroke , 2015, Brain Impairment.

[37]  M. Walker,et al.  Safety and efficacy of co-careldopa as an add-on therapy to occupational and physical therapy in patients after stroke (DARS): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial , 2019, The Lancet Neurology.

[38]  Shyamal Patel,et al.  A review of wearable sensors and systems with application in rehabilitation , 2012, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[39]  J W Krakauer,et al.  The proportional recovery rule for stroke revisited , 2015, Annals of neurology.

[40]  S. Jang,et al.  Classification of cause of motor weakness in traumatic brain injury using diffusion tensor imaging. , 2012, Archives of neurology.

[41]  C. Winstein,et al.  Been there, done that, so what's next for arm and hand rehabilitation in stroke? , 2018, NeuroRehabilitation.

[42]  Carl E. Rasmussen,et al.  Gaussian processes for machine learning , 2005, Adaptive computation and machine learning.

[43]  Sergio P. Rigonatti,et al.  Repeated sessions of noninvasive brain DC stimulation is associated with motor function improvement in stroke patients. , 2007, Restorative neurology and neuroscience.

[44]  Steven A Kautz,et al.  Corticospinal tract lesion load: An imaging biomarker for stroke motor outcomes , 2015, Annals of neurology.

[45]  S. Jaglal,et al.  Cognitive and Motor Recovery and Predictors of Long-Term Outcome in Patients With Traumatic Brain Injury. , 2019, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[46]  Daxi Xiong,et al.  A remote quantitative Fugl-Meyer assessment framework for stroke patients based on wearable sensor networks , 2016, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..

[47]  Shyamal Patel,et al.  Using a Minimum Set of Wearable Sensors to Assess Quality of Movement in Stroke Survivors , 2017, 2017 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Connected Health: Applications, Systems and Engineering Technologies (CHASE).

[48]  S. Sawamura,et al.  Prediction of Functional Outcome After Stroke Rehabilitation , 2000, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[49]  J. Schaechter,et al.  Corticospinal Tract Diffusion Abnormalities Early After Stroke Predict Motor Outcome , 2014, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[50]  Debbie Rand,et al.  Disparity Between Functional Recovery and Daily Use of the Upper and Lower Extremities During Subacute Stroke Rehabilitation , 2012, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[51]  N. Miller,et al.  Technique to improve chronic motor deficit after stroke. , 1993, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[52]  W. Walker,et al.  Motor impairment after severe traumatic brain injury: A longitudinal multicenter study. , 2007, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[53]  J. Daly,et al.  Comparison of robotics, functional electrical stimulation, and motor learning methods for treatment of persistent upper extremity dysfunction after stroke: a randomized controlled trial. , 2015, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[54]  Shyamal Patel,et al.  Using Wearable Motion Sensors to Estimate Longitudinal Changes in Movement Quality in Stroke and Traumatic Brain Injury Survivors Undergoing Rehabilitation , 2016 .

[55]  S. Wolf,et al.  Assessing Wolf Motor Function Test as Outcome Measure for Research in Patients After Stroke , 2001, Stroke.

[56]  Vicky Chan,et al.  Somatosensory system integrity explains differences in treatment response after stroke , 2019, Neurology.

[57]  Sunghoon Ivan Lee,et al.  Estimating Upper-Limb Impairment Level in Stroke Survivors Using Wearable Inertial Sensors and a Minimally-Burdensome Motor Task , 2020, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[58]  Kendra M. Cherry-Allen,et al.  Dose response of task‐specific upper limb training in people at least 6 months poststroke: A phase II, single‐blind, randomized, controlled trial , 2016, Annals of neurology.