The pacing strategy and technique of male cross-country skiers with different levels of performance during a 15-km classical race

In this study the pacing strategy, cycle characteristics and choice of technique of elite male cross-country (XC) skiers during a three-lap, 15-km classical race with interval start were measured. During the Norwegian Championships in 2016, fast (n = 18, age: 26±4 yr; height: 182±4 cm; body mass: 78±3 kg (means±SD)) and slow skiers (n = 18, age: 22±2 yr; height: 183±5 cm; body mass: 78±6 kg) were video recorded on flat (0°), intermediate (3.5°) and uphill sections (7.1°) of the first and final laps. All skiers adopted a positive pacing strategy, skiing more slowly (11.8%) with shorter cycles (11.7%) on the final than first lap (both p<0.001; pη2 = 0.93 and 0.87, respectively). The fast skiers were 7.0% faster overall (p<0.001, d = 4.20), and 6.1% (p<0.001, d = 3.32) and 7.0% (p<0.001, d = 3.68) faster on the first and final laps, respectively, compared to slower skiers. On all sections of both laps, the fast skiers exhibited 9.5% more rapid (pη2 = 0.74) and 8.9% (pη2 = 0.48) longer cycles (both p<0.001). On intermediate terrain, the fast skiers employed primarily double poling (DP, 38.9% on the first lap) and double poling with a kick (DPKICK, 50% on the final lap). In contrast, the slow skiers utilized for the most part DP alone (lap 1: 33.3%, lap 3: 38.9%) or in combination with other techniques (lap 1: 33.3%, lap 3: 38.9%) and decreased their usage of DPKICK from 27.8% on the first to 16.7% on the final lap. Skiing velocity on flat and intermediate terrain proved to be the best predictor of race performance (p<0.001). In conclusion, during a 15-km classical XC skiing race, velocity and cycle length decreased from the first to the final lap, most extensively on flat terrain and least uphill. Moreover, on the intermediate sections the fast and slow skiers chose to use different techniques.

[1]  O. Faude,et al.  Gender differences in power production, energetic capacity and efficiency of elite cross-country skiers during whole-body, upper-body, and arm poling , 2015, European Journal of Applied Physiology.

[2]  Matej Supej,et al.  Analysis of sprint cross-country skiing using a differential global navigation satellite system , 2010, European Journal of Applied Physiology.

[3]  H. Holmberg The elite cross‐country skier provides unique insights into human exercise physiology , 2015, Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports.

[4]  Philippe Hellard,et al.  Exponential growth combined with exponential decline explains lifetime performance evolution in individual and human species , 2011, AGE.

[5]  Barbara Pellegrini,et al.  Energetics and biomechanics of double poling in regional and high-level cross-country skiers , 2014, European Journal of Applied Physiology.

[6]  G. A. Smith,et al.  Double Poling Kinematics and Performance in Cross-Country Skiing , 1996 .

[7]  Øyvind Sandbakk,et al.  The effects of skiing velocity on mechanical aspects of diagonal cross-country skiing , 2014, Sports biomechanics.

[8]  Thomas Stöggl,et al.  Biomechanical characteristics and speed adaptation during kick double poling on roller skis in elite cross-country skiers , 2013, Sports biomechanics.

[9]  A. Rouard,et al.  Dynamics of coordination in cross-country skiing. , 2009, Human movement science.

[10]  Øyvind Sandbakk,et al.  Are Gender Differences in Upper-Body Power Generated by Elite Cross-Country Skiers Augmented by Increasing the Intensity of Exercise? , 2015, PloS one.

[11]  Chris R Abbiss,et al.  Describing and Understanding Pacing Strategies during Athletic Competition , 2008, Sports medicine.

[12]  Øyvind Sandbakk,et al.  Speed and heart-rate profiles in skating and classical cross-country skiing competitions. , 2015, International journal of sports physiology and performance.

[13]  Hans-Christer Holmberg,et al.  Double-Poling Biomechanics of Elite Cross-country Skiers: Flat versus Uphill Terrain. , 2016, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[14]  Robert W. Norman,et al.  Mechanical Power Output and Estimated Metabolic Rates of Nordic Skiers During Olympic Competition , 1989 .

[15]  Hans-Christer Holmberg,et al.  Biomechanical and energetic determinants of technique selection in classical cross-country skiing. , 2013, Human movement science.

[16]  M. Boulay,et al.  Kinematics of cross-country ski racing. , 1996, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[17]  K. Rundell,et al.  Effect of kinematic variables on performance in women during a cross-country ski race. , 1996, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[18]  S. Marshall,et al.  Progressive statistics for studies in sports medicine and exercise science. , 2009, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[19]  T. Karlsen,et al.  Effects of upper-body sprint-interval training on strength and endurance capacities in female cross-country skiers , 2017, PloS one.

[20]  Paavo V. Komi,et al.  Mechanical Energetics of World Class Cross-Country Skiing , 1987 .

[21]  U. Bergh,et al.  Influence of body mass on cross-country ski racing performance. , 1992, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[22]  B. Knechtle,et al.  The Age of Peak Marathon Performance in Cross-Country Skiing—The “Engadin Ski Marathon” , 2017, Journal of strength and conditioning research.

[23]  C. Zinner,et al.  Factors that Influence the Performance of Elite Sprint Cross-Country Skiers , 2016, Sports Medicine.