Examining Menstrual Tracking to Inform the Design of Personal Informatics Tools

We consider why and how women track their menstrual cycles, examining their experiences to uncover design opportunities and extend the field's understanding of personal informatics tools. To understand menstrual cycle tracking practices, we collected and analyzed data from three sources: 2,000 reviews of popular menstrual tracking apps, a survey of 687 people, and follow-up interviews with 12 survey respondents. We find that women track their menstrual cycle for varied reasons that include remembering and predicting their period as well as informing conversations with healthcare providers. Participants described six methods of tracking their menstrual cycles, including use of technology, awareness of their premenstrual physiological states, and simply remembering. Although women find apps and calendars helpful, these methods are ineffective when predictions of future menstrual cycles are inaccurate. Designs can create feelings of exclusion for gender and sexual minorities. Existing apps also generally fail to consider life stages that women experience, including young adulthood, pregnancy, and menopause. Our findings encourage expanding the field's conceptions of personal informatics.

[1]  Deborah Lupton,et al.  An Australian survey of women's use of pregnancy and parenting apps. , 2016, Women and birth : journal of the Australian College of Midwives.

[2]  C. B. Colby.  The weirdest people in the world , 1973 .

[3]  Hilary O D Critchley,et al.  A process designed to lead to international agreement on terminologies and definitions used to describe abnormalities of menstrual bleeding. , 2007, Fertility and sterility.

[4]  Ryen W. White,et al.  Exploring Time-Dependent Concerns about Pregnancy and Childbirth from Search Logs , 2015, CHI.

[5]  G. Masnick,et al.  First ovulation after childbirth: the effect of breast-feeding. , 1972, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[6]  Alexis Hope,et al.  A Feminist HCI Approach to Designing Postpartum Technologies: "When I first saw a breast pump I was wondering if it was a joke" , 2016, CHI.

[7]  Charlotte P. Lee,et al.  Boundary Negotiating Artifacts: Unbinding the Routine of Boundary Objects and Embracing Chaos in Collaborative Work , 2007, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[8]  Madhu Reddy,et al.  "Every pregnancy is different": designing mHealth for the pregnancy ecology , 2014, Conference on Designing Interactive Systems.

[9]  Julie A. Kientz,et al.  @BabySteps: design and evaluation of a system for using twitter for tracking children's developmental milestones , 2014, CHI.

[10]  Matthew Chalmers,et al.  Personal tracking as lived informatics , 2014, CHI.

[11]  S. Levinson,et al.  WEIRD languages have misled us, too , 2010, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[12]  Ann Blandford,et al.  Don't forget your pill!: designing effective medication reminder apps that support users' daily routines , 2014, CHI.

[13]  T. Marteau,et al.  The Place of Inter-Rater Reliability in Qualitative Research: An Empirical Study , 1997 .

[14]  A. Nelson,et al.  Extended-Cycle Oral Contraception , 2005, Treatments in endocrinology.

[15]  Rob Comber,et al.  On Looking at the Vagina through Labella , 2016, CHI.

[16]  David W. McDonald,et al.  Activity sensing in the wild: a field trial of ubifit garden , 2008, CHI.

[17]  Sean A. Munson,et al.  Boundary Negotiating Artifacts in Personal Informatics: Patient-Provider Collaboration with Patient-Generated Data , 2015, CSCW.

[18]  T M Mulders,et al.  Use of the novel combined contraceptive vaginal ring NuvaRing for ovulation inhibition. , 2001, Fertility and sterility.

[19]  Rob Comber,et al.  HCI and Intimate Care as an Agenda for Change in Women's Health , 2016, CHI.

[20]  Shaowen Bardzell,et al.  Feminist HCI: taking stock and outlining an agenda for design , 2010, CHI.

[21]  Dan Morris,et al.  There's no such thing as gaining a pound: reconsidering the bathroom scale user interface , 2013, UbiComp.

[22]  Meredith Ringel Morris,et al.  Social networking site use by mothers of young children , 2014, CSCW.

[23]  Tamara Peyton,et al.  Paging “Dr. Google”: Does Technology Fill the Gap Created by the Prenatal Care Visit Structure? Qualitative Focus Group Study With Pregnant Women , 2014, Journal of medical Internet research.

[24]  T. Kuehl,et al.  Acceptance of altering the standard 21-day/7-day oral contraceptive regimen to delay menses and reduce hormone withdrawal symptoms. , 2002, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[25]  Rob Comber,et al.  FeedFinder: A Location-Mapping Mobile Application for Breastfeeding Women , 2015, CHI.

[26]  Tamara Peyton,et al.  “Every pregnancy is different”: Designing mHealth interventions for the pregnancy ecology , 2014 .

[27]  Mark W. Newman,et al.  When fitness trackers don't 'fit': end-user difficulties in the assessment of personal tracking device accuracy , 2015, UbiComp.

[28]  R. Cassidy,et al.  Overview of Race and Hispanic Origin: 2000 , 2001 .

[29]  Jodi Forlizzi,et al.  A stage-based model of personal informatics systems , 2010, CHI.

[30]  Sean A. Munson,et al.  A lived informatics model of personal informatics , 2015, UbiComp.

[31]  J. Bancroft,et al.  Mood, Sexuality, Hormones and the Menstrual Cycle. I. Changes in Mood and Physical State: Description of Subjects and Method , 1983, Psychosomatic medicine.

[32]  Gregory D. Abowd,et al.  Baby steps: evaluation of a system to support record-keeping for parents of young children , 2009, CHI.

[33]  William G. Griswold,et al.  Usability and Feasibility of PmEB: A Mobile Phone Application for Monitoring Real Time Caloric Balance , 2006, Mob. Networks Appl..

[34]  Roberto R. Ramirez,et al.  Overview of Race and Hispanic Origin: 2010 , 2011 .

[35]  S. Schoenebeck.  The Secret Life of Online Moms: Anonymity and Disinhibition on YouBeMom.com , 2013, ICWSM.

[36]  A. Treloar,et al.  Variation of the human menstrual cycle through reproductive life. , 1967, International journal of fertility.

[37]  Shaowen Bardzell,et al.  Towards a feminist HCI methodology: social science, feminism, and HCI , 2011, CHI.

[38]  Minal Jain,et al.  Game based learning tool seeking peer support for empowering adolescent girls in rural Assam , 2015, IDC.

[39]  David A. Shamma,et al.  Money talks: tracking personal finances , 2014, CHI.

[40]  Deborah Lupton.  Quantified sex: a critical analysis of sexual and reproductive self-tracking using apps , 2015, Culture, health & sexuality.

[41]  D. Lupton,et al.  Threats and thrills: pregnancy apps, risk and consumption , 2016 .

[42]  Jodi Forlizzi,et al.  Understanding my data, myself: supporting self-reflection with ubicomp technologies , 2011, UbiComp '11.

[43]  Shwetak N. Patel,et al.  How Good is 85%?: A Survey Tool to Connect Classifier Evaluation to Acceptability of Accuracy , 2015, CHI.

[44]  M. Broder,et al.  Can we achieve international agreement on terminologies and definitions used to describe abnormalities of menstrual bleeding? , 2007, Human reproduction.