Computerized physician order entry (CPOE) system: expectations and experiences of users.

OBJECTIVES To explore physicians' and nurses' expectations before and experiences after the implementation of a computerized physician order entry (CPOE) system in order to give suggestions for future optimization of the system as well as the implementation process. METHOD On four internal medicine wards of two Dutch hospitals, 18 physicians and 42 nurses were interviewed to measure expectations and experiences with the CPOE system. Using semi-structured questionnaires, expectations and experiences of physicians and nurses with the CPOE system were measured with statements on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = completely disagree, 5 = completely agree). The percentage respondents agreeing (score of 4 or 5) was calculated. Chi-squared tests were used to compare the expectations versus experiences of physicians and nurses and to assess the differences between physicians and nurses. RESULTS In general, both physicians and nurses were positive about CPOE before and after the implementation of this system. Physicians and nurses did not differ in their views towards CPOE except for the overview of patients' medication use that was not clear according to the nurses. Both professions were satisfied with the implementation process. CPOE could be improved especially with respect to technical aspects (including the medication overview) and decision support on drug-drug interactions. CONCLUSION Overall we conclude that physicians and nurses are positive about CPOE and the process of its implementation and do accept these systems. However, these systems should be further improved to fit into clinical practice.

[1]  A. Localio,et al.  Role of computerized physician order entry systems in facilitating medication errors. , 2005, JAMA.

[2]  Marc Berg,et al.  Research Paper: Turning Off Frequently Overridden Drug Alerts: Limited Opportunities for Doing It Safely , 2008, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[3]  D. Bates,et al.  Information technology and medication safety: what is the benefit? , 2002, Quality & safety in health care.

[4]  Jos Aarts,et al.  Organizational issues in health informatics: a model approach , 1998, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[5]  W. Velicer,et al.  The Transtheoretical Model of Health Behavior Change , 1997, American journal of health promotion : AJHP.

[6]  Wei Wu,et al.  The Effect of Computerized Physician Order Entry with Clinical Decision Support on the Rates of Adverse Drug Events: A Systematic Review , 2008, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[7]  ELSKE AMMENWERTH,et al.  Review Paper: The Effect of Electronic Prescribing on Medication Errors and Adverse Drug Events: A Systematic Review , 2008, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[8]  Patrice Degoulet,et al.  Impact of CPOE on doctor-nurse cooperation for the medication ordering and administration process , 2005, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[9]  Y. Han,et al.  Unexpected Increased Mortality After Implementation of a Commercially Sold Computerized Physician Order Entry System , 2005, Pediatrics.

[10]  Dean F. Sittig,et al.  Computerized Provider Order Entry Adoption: Implications for Clinical Workflow , 2008, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[11]  Roland Bal,et al.  Impact of a computerized physician order entry system on nurse-physician collaboration in the medication process , 2008, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[12]  D. Bates,et al.  Effects of computerized physician order entry and clinical decision support systems on medication safety: a systematic review. , 2003, Archives of internal medicine.

[13]  Marc Berg,et al.  Overriding of drug safety alerts in computerized physician order entry. , 2006, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA.

[14]  Paul N. Gorman,et al.  Perceptions of house officers who use physician order entry , 1999, AMIA.

[15]  James D. Carpenter,et al.  Adding Insight: A Qualitative Cross-Site Study of Physician Order Entry , 2004, MedInfo.