Classroom Climate and Contextual Effects: Conceptual and Methodological Issues in the Evaluation of Group-Level Effects

Classroom context and climate are inherently classroom-level (L2) constructs, but applied researchers sometimes—inappropriately—represent them by student-level (L1) responses in single-level models rather than more appropriate multilevel models. Here we focus on important conceptual issues (distinctions between climate and contextual variables; use of classroom L2 rather than student-level L1 measures) and more appropriate multilevel models. To illustrate these issues, we consider the effects of two L2 classroom climate variables and one L2 classroom contextual variable on two L1 student-level outcomes for 2261 students in 128 classes. Through this example, we illustrate how to apply evolving doubly latent multilevel models to (a) evaluate the factor structure of L1 and L2 constructs based on multiple indicators of classroom climate and context measures, (b) control measurement error at L1 and L2, (c) control sampling error in the aggregation of L1 responses to form L2 constructs (the average of student-level responses to form classroom-level constructs), and (d) provide guidelines for appropriate analysis of classroom climate as an L2 construct. [Supplementary materials are available for this article. Go to the publisher's online edition of Educational Psychologist for the following free supplemental resources: Substantive basis of the present investigation and more detailed description of the methodology.]

[1]  M. Jerusalem.  Reference Group, Learning Environment and Self-Evaluations: A Dynamic Multi-Level Analysis with Latent Variables , 1984 .

[2]  Mieke Brekelmans,et al.  Coercive and Supportive Teacher Behaviour: Within- and across-Lesson Associations with the Classroom Social Climate. , 2011 .

[3]  Ramon Lewis,et al.  Classroom discipline and student responsibility:: The students’ view , 2001 .

[4]  Michael C Neale,et al.  People are variables too: multilevel structural equations modeling. , 2005, Psychological methods.

[5]  Risto Lehtonen,et al.  Multilevel Statistical Models , 2005 .

[6]  David E. Booth,et al.  Analysis of Incomplete Multivariate Data , 2000, Technometrics.

[7]  R. P. McDonald,et al.  Structural Models and the Art of Approximation , 2010, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[8]  Franz Emanuel Weinert,et al.  Quality of instruction and classroom learning outcomes: The German contribution to the IEA classroom environment study , 1986 .

[9]  D. Hutchison.  When is a Compositional Effect not a Compositional Effect? , 2007 .

[10]  Ming-Te Wang,et al.  Adolescents’ Perceptions of School Environment, Engagement, and Academic Achievement in Middle School , 2010 .

[11]  H. Marsh,et al.  Tracking, grading, and student motivation : Using group composition and status to predict self-concept and interest in ninth-grade mathematics , 2006 .

[12]  Kenneth E. Harper,et al.  Contextual analysis , 1957, Mech. Transl. Comput. Linguistics.

[13]  Jutta Heckhausen,et al.  Motivation and action , 1991 .

[14]  I G Kreft,et al.  The Effect of Different Forms of Centering in Hierarchical Linear Models. , 1995, Multivariate behavioral research.

[15]  Christopher Winship,et al.  Counterfactuals and Causal Inference: Methods and Principles for Social Research , 2007 .

[16]  Jere Brophy,et al.  Educating Teachers about Managing Classrooms and Students. Occasional Paper No. 115. , 1987 .

[17]  Ulrich Trautwein,et al.  The Big-fish–little-pond-effect Stands Up to Critical Scrutiny: Implications for Theory, Methodology, and Future Research , 2008 .

[18]  Carol Midgley,et al.  Goals, goal structures, and patterns of adaptive learning , 2014 .

[19]  M. Covington.  Goal theory, motivation, and school achievement: an integrative review. , 2000, Annual review of psychology.

[20]  C. Evertson,et al.  Improving Classroom Management: An Experiment in Elementary School Classrooms , 1983, The Elementary School Journal.

[21]  Kristopher J Preacher,et al.  A general multilevel SEM framework for assessing multilevel mediation. , 2010, Psychological methods.

[22]  Roel Bosker,et al.  Multilevel analysis : an introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling , 1999 .

[23]  H. Marsh,et al.  Reciprocal Effects of Self-Concept and Performance From a Multidimensional Perspective: Beyond Seductive Pleasure and Unidimensional Perspectives , 2006, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[24]  William T. Hoyt,et al.  Rater bias in psychological research: when is it a problem and what can we do about it? , 2000, Psychological methods.

[25]  Andrew J. Martin,et al.  A multilevel perspective on gender in classroom motivation and climate: Potential benefits of male teachers for boys? , 2008 .

[26]  M. Croon,et al.  Predicting group-level outcome variables from variables measured at the individual level: a latent variable multilevel model. , 2007, Psychological methods.

[27]  F. Rheinberg,et al.  Erziehungsziele von Lehrern und individuelle Bezugsnormen der Leistungsbewertung , 1995 .

[28]  Karl G. Jöreskog,et al.  LISREL 7: A guide to the program and applications , 1988 .

[29]  R. Cardullo,et al.  Does math self-efficacy mediate the effect of the perceived classroom environment on standardized math test performance? , 2010 .

[30]  Michel Boivin,et al.  Academic Self-Concept and Academic Achievement: Developmental Perspectives on Their Causal Ordering. , 2003 .

[31]  Jutta Heckhausen,et al.  Motivation and action (2nd ed.). , 2008 .

[32]  D. Kaplan.  Structural Equation Modeling: Foundations and Extensions , 2000 .

[33]  Ulrich Trautwein,et al.  Academic self-concept, interest, grades, and standardized test scores: reciprocal effects models of causal ordering. , 2005, Child development.

[34]  Herbert W. Marsh,et al.  A Multilevel Approach to Motivational Climate in Physical Education and Sport Settings: An Individual or a Group Level Construct? , 2004 .

[35]  J. Gill.  Hierarchical Linear Models , 2005 .

[36]  P. Bliese.  Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis. , 2000 .

[37]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  Self-concept of ability and perceived evaluation of others: cause or effect of academic achievement? , 1977, Journal of educational psychology.

[38]  Robert M. O'Brien,et al.  Estimating the Reliability of Aggregate-Level Variables Based on Individual-Level Characteristics , 1990 .

[39]  B. Muthén.  Latent variable modeling in heterogeneous populations , 1989 .

[40]  Robert L. Brennan,et al.  NCME instructional module: Generalizability theory. , 1992 .

[41]  P. Tymms,et al.  The Effects of Student Composition on School Outcomes , 2004 .

[42]  U. Trautwein,et al.  Self-esteem, academic self-concept, and achievement: how the learning environment moderates the dynamics of self-concept. , 2006, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[43]  U. Trautwein,et al.  Big-Fish-Little-Pond effect , 2006, Vernon Wall Lecture.

[44]  Carole A. Ames.  Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation. , 1992 .

[45]  E. Foster,et al.  Causal inference and developmental psychology. , 2010, Developmental psychology.

[46]  Ulrich Trautwein,et al.  Doubly-Latent Models of School Contextual Effects: Integrating Multilevel and Structural Equation Approaches to Control Measurement and Sampling Error , 2009, Multivariate behavioral research.

[47]  Barbara M. Byrne,et al.  Causal ordering of academic self-concept and achievement: Reanalysis of a pioneering study and... , 1999 .

[48]  H. Cooper,et al.  The Relation Between Self-Beliefs and Academic Achievement: A Meta-Analytic Review , 2004 .

[49]  Kristopher J Preacher,et al.  Alternative Methods for Assessing Mediation in Multilevel Data: The Advantages of Multilevel SEM , 2011 .

[50]  Alison O'Mara,et al.  Reciprocal Effects Between Academic Self-Concept, Self-Esteem, Achievement, and Attainment Over Seven Adolescent Years: Unidimensional and Multidimensional Perspectives of Self-Concept , 2008, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[51]  B. Muthén,et al.  The multilevel latent covariate model: a new, more reliable approach to group-level effects in contextual studies. , 2008, Psychological methods.

[52]  H. Marsh,et al.  Teacher frame of reference and the big-fish-little-pond effect , 2005 .

[53]  David M. Lahuis,et al.  The Accuracy of Significance Tests for Slope Variance Components in Multilevel Random Coefficient Models , 2009 .

[54]  H. Marsh.  Causal ordering of academic self-concept and academic achievement: A multiwave, longitudinal panel analysis. , 1990 .

[55]  M. Kane,et al.  STUDENT EVALUATIONS OF TEACHING: THE GENERALIZABILITY OF CLASS MEANS , 1976 .

[56]  Ulrich Trautwein,et al.  Assessing the impact of learning environments: How to use student ratings of classroom or school characteristics in multilevel modeling , 2009 .

[57]  Roderick P. McDonald,et al.  The Bilevel Reticular Action Model for Path Analysis with Latent Variables , 1994 .

[58]  Lee J. Cronbach,et al.  Research on Classrooms and Schools: Formulation of Questions, Design and Analysis. , 1976 .

[59]  H. Marsh.  Academic self-concept: Theory, measurement, and research. , 1993 .

[60]  Herbert W. Marsh,et al.  The negative effect of school-average ability on science self-concept in the UK, the UK countries and the world: the Big-Fish-Little-Pond-Effect for PISA 2006 , 2011 .

[61]  Nicole A. Lazar,et al.  Statistical Analysis With Missing Data , 2003, Technometrics.

[62]  Nigel O'Brian,et al.  Generalizability Theory I , 2003 .

[63]  J. Baumert.  TIMSS : Mathematisch-naturwissenschaftlicher Unterricht im internationalen Vergleich , 1997 .

[64]  Rhona S. Weinstein,et al.  Classroom Factors Affecting Students’ Self-Evaluations: An Interactional Model , 1984 .

[65]  B. Muthén,et al.  Multilevel Covariance Structure Analysis , 1994 .

[66]  Ulrich Trautwein,et al.  A 2 × 2 taxonomy of multilevel latent contextual models: accuracy-bias trade-offs in full and partial error correction models. , 2011, Psychological methods.

[67]  David Chan,et al.  Multilevel Methods , 2007 .

[68]  W. Garms,et al.  Fifteen Thousand Hours: Secondary Schools and Their Effects on Children , 1980 .

[69]  H. Marsh.  Application of Confirmatory Factor Analysis and Structural Equation Modeling in Sport and Exercise Psychology , 2012 .

[70]  Kennon M. Sheldon,et al.  Buffering against performance classroom goal structures: The importance of autonomy support and classroom community. , 2010 .

[71]  T. Murdock,et al.  Modeling latent true scores to determine the utility of aggregate student perceptions as classroom indicators in HLM: The case of classroom goal structures , 2007 .

[72]  Harvey Goldstein,et al.  A general model for the analysis of multilevel data , 1988 .

[73]  B. Lazerick.  Third international mathematics and science study , 1997 .

[74]  S. Kozlowski,et al.  Multilevel Theory, Research, a n d M e t h o d s i n Organizations Foundations, Extensions, and New Directions , 2022 .

[75]  Yongyun Shin,et al.  A Latent Cluster-Mean Approach to the Contextual Effects Model With Missing Data , 2010 .

[76]  Jens Möller,et al.  Frame of Reference Effects Following the Announcement of Exam Results. , 2001, Contemporary educational psychology.

[77]  S. Rabe-Hesketh,et al.  Generalized multilevel structural equation modeling , 2004 .

[78]  Jacob Cohen.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[79]  Craig K. Enders,et al.  Centering predictor variables in cross-sectional multilevel models: a new look at an old issue. , 2007, Psychological methods.

[80]  Roderick P. McDonald,et al.  A general model for two-level data with responses missing at random , 1993 .

[81]  Randy Moore,et al.  Student Evaluations of Teaching , 1997 .

[82]  K. Matheny,et al.  Academic improvement through an experimental classroom management system , 1974 .

[83]  Petter Laake,et al.  Regression among factor scores , 2001 .