The development of social science research on smart grids: a semi-structured literature review

[1]  N. Stern,et al.  China's flexibility challenge in achieving carbon neutrality by 2060 , 2022, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.

[2]  S. Pink,et al.  Digital technology and energy imaginaries of future home life: Comic-strip scenarios as a method to disrupt energy industry futures , 2022, Energy Research & Social Science.

[3]  Erik Laes,et al.  Energy Communities and the Tensions Between Neoliberalism and Communitarianism , 2022, Sci. Eng. Ethics.

[4]  S. Mander,et al.  Low carbon system innovation through an energy justice lens: Exploring domestic heat pump adoption with direct load control in the United Kingdom , 2022, Energy Research & Social Science.

[5]  N. Biddle,et al.  The role of human influences on adoption and rejection of energy technology: A systematised critical review of the literature on household energy transitions , 2022, Energy Research & Social Science.

[6]  H. Lovell.  Understanding Energy Innovation , 2022 .

[7]  Ana Tomicic,et al.  Ethical, Legal and Social Issues of Digital Phenotyping as a Future Solution for Present-Day Challenges: A Scoping Review , 2021, Science and Engineering Ethics.

[8]  Fortune Nwaiwu.  Digitalisation and sustainable energy transitions in Africa: assessing the impact of policy and regulatory environments on the energy sector in Nigeria and South Africa , 2021, Energy, Sustainability and Society.

[9]  D. Hess,et al.  Who controls electricity transitions? Digitization, decarbonization, and local power organizations , 2021 .

[10]  Ida Marie Henriksen,et al.  Social license to automate : a critical review of emerging approaches to electricity demand management , 2021 .

[11]  J. Sztipanovits,et al.  A comparative, sociotechnical design perspective on Responsible Innovation: multidisciplinary research and education on digitized energy and Automated Vehicles , 2021, Journal of Responsible Innovation.

[12]  J. Palm.  Exploring Limited Capacity in the Grid: Actors, Problems, and Solutions , 2021, Frontiers in Energy Research.

[13]  Frans Libertson.  Competing socio-technical narratives in times of grid capacity challenges: the representative case of Sweden , 2021 .

[14]  Raminta Pranckute,et al.  Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today's Academic World , 2021, Publ..

[15]  Geerten van de Kaa,et al.  Designing for justice in electricity systems: A comparison of smart grid experiments in the Netherlands , 2020, Energy Policy.

[16]  J. Palm,et al.  Distributed Energy Systems and Energy Communities Under Negotiation , 2020, Technology and Economics of Smart Grids and Sustainable Energy.

[17]  Kacper Szulecki,et al.  Energy democracy as a process, an outcome and a goal: A conceptual review , 2020 .

[18]  Josephine Dionisio,et al.  Challenges for implementing renewable energy in a cooperative-driven off-grid system in the Philippines , 2020, Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions.

[19]  David Maya-Drysdale,et al.  Energy Vision Strategies for the EU Green New Deal: A Case Study of European Cities , 2020, Energies.

[20]  H. Lovell,et al.  Smart grid knowledges and the state , 2020, Area.

[21]  Kirsten Ulsrud.  Access to electricity for all and the role of decentralized solar power in sub-Saharan Africa , 2020 .

[22]  Heather Lovell,et al.  The promise of smart grids , 2019, Smart and Sustainable Cities?.

[23]  D. Mah.  Conceptualising government-market dynamics in socio-technical energy transitions: A comparative case study of smart grid developments in China and Japan , 2020 .

[24]  Darcy Parks,et al.  The Struggles of Smart Energy Places: Regulatory Lock-In and the Swedish Electricity Market , 2020, Annals of the American Association of Geographers.

[25]  Stephen Potter,et al.  Smoothing peaks and troughs: Intermediary practices to promote demand side response in smart grids , 2019, Energy Research & Social Science.

[26]  Hannah Snyder,et al.  Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines , 2019, Journal of Business Research.

[27]  É. Chappin,et al.  Conflicting values in the smart electricity grid a comprehensive overview , 2019, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.

[28]  Anna Wallsten,et al.  The discreet charm of activeness: the vain construction of efficient smart grid users , 2019, Journal of Cultural Economy.

[29]  Catherine Grandclément,et al.  Electricity engineers and the happening of behaviour: lessons from a real-scale experiment , 2019, Distinktion: Journal of Social Theory.

[30]  Ji Johanna Höffken,et al.  Collective Energy Practices: A Practice-Based Approach to Civic Energy Communities and the Energy System , 2019, Sustainability.

[31]  Sanneke Kloppenburg,et al.  Digital platforms and the future of energy provisioning: Promises and perils for the next phase of the energy transition , 2019, Energy Research & Social Science.

[32]  Ankit Kumar,et al.  Beyond technical smartness: Rethinking the development and implementation of sociotechnical smart grids in India , 2019, Energy Research & Social Science.

[33]  Darcy Parks.  Energy efficiency left behind? Policy assemblages in Sweden’s most climate-smart city , 2019 .

[34]  T. H. Christensen,et al.  Time-shifting laundry practices in a smart grid perspective: a cross-cultural analysis of Pakistani and Danish middle-class households , 2019, Energy Efficiency.

[35]  Benjamin K. Sovacool,et al.  Further reflections on vulnerability and resistance in the United Kingdom's smart meter transition , 2017, Energy Policy.

[36]  Felix Lehfuss,et al.  An Exploration of the Three-Layer Model Including Stakeholders, Markets and Technologies for Assessments of Residential Smart Grids , 2018, Applied Sciences.

[37]  Benjamin K. Sovacool,et al.  Promoting novelty, rigor, and style in energy social science: Towards codes of practice for appropriate methods and research design , 2018, Energy Research & Social Science.

[38]  Diana Moneta,et al.  Smart grids: enabler for the energy transition , 2018 .

[39]  A. Levenda.  Mobilizing smart grid experiments: Policy mobilities and urban energy governance , 2018, Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space.

[40]  I. Rowlands,et al.  Towards a smart and sustainable residential energy culture: assessing participant feedback from a long-term smart grid pilot project , 2018, Energy, Sustainability and Society.

[41]  Heather L. Rosenfeld.  “Plug into Choice”? The Trouble with Common-Sense Participation in a Smart Electric Grid , 2018 .

[42]  R. Cordero,et al.  Is Peru Prepared for Large-Scale Sustainable Rural Electrification? , 2018 .

[43]  Marianne Ryghaug,et al.  Creating energy citizenship through material participation , 2018, Social studies of science.

[44]  G. Spaargaren,et al.  When social practices meet smart grids : Flexibility, grid management, and domestic consumption in The Netherlands , 2017 .

[45]  S. Bell,et al.  Domesticating In Home Displays in selected British and Norwegian households , 2017 .

[46]  Ji Johanna Höffken,et al.  Is the resource man coming home? : engaging with an energy monitoring platform to foster flexible energy consumption in the Netherlands , 2017 .

[47]  R. Ford,et al.  Emerging energy transitions: PV uptake beyond subsidies , 2017 .

[48]  William Throndsen,et al.  What do experts talk about when they talk about users? Expectations and imagined users in the smart grid , 2017 .

[49]  Meiken Hansen,et al.  Prosumers and smart grid technologies in Denmark: developing user competences in smart grid households , 2017 .

[50]  Tomas Moe Skjølsvold,et al.  Users, design and the role of feedback technologies in the Norwegian energy transition: An empirical study and some radical challenges , 2017 .

[51]  Meiken Hansen,et al.  Scripting, control, and privacy in domestic smart grid technologies: insights from a Danish pilot study , 2017 .

[52]  Joeri Naus,et al.  Accomplishing information and change in a smart grid pilot: Linking domestic practices with policy interventions , 2017 .

[53]  Simona Bigerna,et al.  Socio-economic acceptability for smart grid development – a comprehensive review , 2016 .

[54]  Toke Haunstrup Christensen,et al.  The challenge of time shifting energy demand practices: Insights from Denmark , 2016 .

[55]  H. Bulkeley,et al.  Making a smart city for the smart grid? The urban material politics of actualising smart electricity networks , 2016 .

[56]  Jaehun Joo,et al.  Strategic Guidelines for the Diffusion of Smart Grid Technologies Through a Korean Testbed , 2016, Inf. Technol. Dev..

[57]  Eva Heiskanen,et al.  Smart grid: hope or hype? , 2015, Energy Efficiency.

[58]  Kaitlin T. Raimi,et al.  Understanding and beliefs about smart energy technology , 2016 .

[59]  C. Büscher,et al.  “Trust” and “confidence” as socio-technical problems in the transformation of energy systems , 2015 .

[60]  G. Sussman,et al.  The Neoliberal Politics of 'Smart': Electricity Consumption, Household Monitoring, and the Enterprise Form , 2015 .

[61]  Thomas Berker,et al.  A traveler’s guide to smart grids and the social sciences☆ , 2015 .

[62]  C. Lindkvist,et al.  Ambivalence, designing users and user imaginaries in the European smart grid: Insights from an interdisciplinary demonstration project , 2015 .

[63]  I. Ballo.  Imagining energy futures: Sociotechnical imaginaries of the future Smart Grid in Norway , 2015 .

[64]  Marianne Ryghaug,et al.  Material participation and the smart grid: Exploring different modes of articulation , 2015 .

[65]  Franziska Engels,et al.  The micro smart grid as a materialised imaginary within the German energy transition , 2015 .

[66]  Inge Røpke,et al.  Heat pumps in Denmark - From ugly duckling to white swan , 2015 .

[67]  Matthew Zook,et al.  The 'Actually Existing Smart City' , 2015 .

[68]  Sarah Royston,et al.  Smart energy technologies in everyday life: smart Utopia? , 2014, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[69]  Nazmiye Balta-Ozkan,et al.  A comparison of consumer perceptions towards smart homes in the UK, Germany and Italy: reflections for policy and future research , 2014, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[70]  Stephen Hall,et al.  Values in the Smart Grid: The co-evolving political economy of smart distribution , 2014 .

[71]  N. Balta-Ozkan,et al.  European smart home market development: Public views on technical and economic aspects across the United Kingdom, Germany and Italy , 2014 .

[72]  Tom Rodden,et al.  Smart grids, smart users? The role of the user in demand side management , 2014 .

[73]  Tracy Bhamra,et al.  “For the times they are a-changin”: the impact of shifting energy-use practices in time and space , 2014 .

[74]  Joeri Naus,et al.  Smart grids, information flows and emerging domestic energy practices , 2014 .

[75]  Y. Strengers,et al.  Air-conditioning and antibiotics: Demand management insights from problematic health and household cooling practices , 2014 .

[76]  A. Grunwald.  Modes of orientation provided by futures studies: making sense of diversity and divergence , 2013, European Journal of Futures Research.

[77]  Angelina H.M.E. Reinders,et al.  Empowering the end-user in smart grids: Recommendations for the design of products and services , 2013 .

[78]  Ijeoma Onyeji,et al.  Consumer engagement: An insight from smart grid projects in Europe , 2013 .

[79]  Morten Boje Blarke,et al.  SuperGrid or SmartGrid: Competing strategies for large-scale integration of intermittent renewables? , 2013 .

[80]  G. Verbong,et al.  Smart grids or smart users? Involving users in developing a low carbon electricity economy , 2013 .

[81]  Yolande Strengers,et al.  Smart Energy Technologies in Everyday Life , 2013 .

[82]  D. Mah,et al.  Consumer perceptions of smart grid development: Results of a Hong Kong survey and policy implications , 2012 .

[83]  M. Wolsink.  The research agenda on social acceptance of distributed generation in smart grids: Renewable as common pool resources , 2012 .

[84]  S. Jasanoff,et al.  Containing the Atom: Sociotechnical Imaginaries and Nuclear Power in the United States and South Korea , 2009 .

[85]  A. Bryman.  Effective leadership in higher education: a literature review , 2007 .

[86]  Jaap Jelsma,et al.  Innovating for Sustainability: Involving Users, Politics and Technology , 2003 .

[87]  Hilde van der Togt,et al.  Publisher's Note , 2003, J. Netw. Comput. Appl..

[88]  M. Hammersley.  On 'systematic' reviews of research literatures: A 'narrative' response to Evans & Benefield , 2001 .

[89]  R. Baumeister,et al.  Writing Narrative Literature Reviews , 1997, Review of General Psychology.

[90]  P. Atkinson,et al.  Making Sense of Qualitative Data: Complementary Research Strategies , 1996 .

[91]  T. P. Hughes.  The Seamless Web: Technology, Science, Etcetera, Etcetera , 1986 .

[92]  T. P. Hughes,et al.  Networks of Power: Electrification in Western Society, 1880-1930 , 1984 .

[93]  T. P. Hughes,et al.  Networks of Power: Electrification in Western Society , 1984 .