Performance on variable-interval schedules arranged singly and concurrently.

Extensive parametric data were obtained from pigeons responding on variable-interval schedules arranged on three, two, and one response keys. Number of responses on the keys, the time spent responding on the keys, and the number of reinforcements obtained on the keys were measured. Response rates on each key were an increasing function of the reinforcement rate on that key, and an inverse function of the reinforcement rate on the other keys. In terms of preference, both response and time-allocation ratios undermatched ratios of obtained reinforcements, and the degree of undermatching was consistent both within, and between, two- and three-schedule data. When absolute response-rate data were analyzed according to Herrnstein's (1970) quantitative account, obtained values of assumed constants were not consistent either within or between conditions. However, a power-function modification of Herrnstein's account fitted the data well and provided similar exponent values to those obtained for the undermatching of preference ratios.

[1]  M C Davison,et al.  Performance in concurrent interval schedules: a systematic replication. , 1975, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[2]  A. Catania,et al.  Concurrent performances: reinforcement interaction and response independence. , 1963, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[3]  M C Davison,et al.  Preference for qualitatively different reinforcers. , 1971, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[4]  A C CATANIA,et al.  Experimental control of superstitious responding inhumans. , 1963, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[5]  W M Baum,et al.  Time allocation in human vigilance. , 1975, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[6]  R. Shull,et al.  Changeover delay and concurrent schedules: some effects on relative performance measures. , 1967, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[7]  W Temple,et al.  Preference for fixed-interval terminal links in a three-key concurrent chain schedule. , 1974, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[8]  R. Herrnstein On the law of effect. , 1970, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[9]  R J Herrnstein,et al.  Formal properties of the matching law. , 1974, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[10]  G. S. Reynolds On some determinants of choice in pigeons. , 1963, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[11]  M Rilling,et al.  A preliminary analysis of the dynamics of the pecking response in pigeons. , 1970, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[12]  R. J. Irwin,et al.  Multiple schedules: effects of the distribution of reinforcements between component on the distribution of responses between conponents. , 1968, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[13]  W M Baum,et al.  On two types of deviation from the matching law: bias and undermatching. , 1974, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[14]  J. Staddon,et al.  OF THE EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS OF BEHAVIOR SPACED RESPONDING AND CHOICE : A PRELIMINARY ANALYSIS ' , 2005 .

[15]  R J HERRNSTEIN,et al.  Relative and absolute strength of response as a function of frequency of reinforcement. , 1961, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[16]  I L Cohen,et al.  A note on Herrnstein's Equation. , 1973, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.