Development of Health Parameter Model for Risk Prediction of CVD Using SVM

Current methods of cardiovascular risk assessment are performed using health factors which are often based on the Framingham study. However, these methods have significant limitations due to their poor sensitivity and specificity. We have compared the parameters from the Framingham equation with linear regression analysis to establish the effect of training of the model for the local database. Support vector machine was used to determine the effectiveness of machine learning approach with the Framingham health parameters for risk assessment of cardiovascular disease (CVD). The result shows that while linear model trained using local database was an improvement on Framingham model, SVM based risk assessment model had high sensitivity and specificity of prediction of CVD. This indicates that using the health parameters identified using Framingham study, machine learning approach overcomes the low sensitivity and specificity of Framingham model.

[1]  M. Lund,et al.  Comparison of sensitivity and specificity of 4 methods for detection of Giardia duodenalis in feces: immunofluorescence and PCR are superior to microscopy of concentrated iodine-stained samples. , 2016, Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease.

[2]  Giel Nijpels,et al.  Race/Ethnic Differences in the Associations of the Framingham Risk Factors with Carotid IMT and Cardiovascular Events , 2015, PloS one.

[3]  Ben Goldacre,et al.  Prediction of Cardiovascular Risk Using Framingham, ASSIGN and QRISK2: How Well Do They Predict Individual Rather than Population Risk? , 2014, PloS one.

[4]  John P A Ioannidis,et al.  Comparisons of established risk prediction models for cardiovascular disease: systematic review , 2012, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[5]  Yoshua Bengio,et al.  Random Search for Hyper-Parameter Optimization , 2012, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[6]  W. Marsden I and J , 2012 .

[7]  Gaël Varoquaux,et al.  Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python , 2011, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[8]  Bridget B. Kelly,et al.  Promoting Cardiovascular Health in the Developing World: A Critical Challenge to Achieve Global Health , 2010 .

[9]  Muin J. Khoury,et al.  Application of support vector machine modeling for prediction of common diseases: the case of diabetes and pre-diabetes , 2010, BMC Medical Informatics Decis. Mak..

[10]  Gary S Collins,et al.  An independent external validation and evaluation of QRISK cardiovascular risk prediction: a prospective open cohort study , 2009, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[11]  Yanqing Zhang,et al.  SVMs Modeling for Highly Imbalanced Classification , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B (Cybernetics).

[12]  M. Pencina,et al.  General Cardiovascular Risk Profile for Use in Primary Care: The Framingham Heart Study , 2008, Circulation.

[13]  N. Cook,et al.  Development and validation of improved algorithms for the assessment of global cardiovascular risk in women: the Reynolds Risk Score. , 2007, JAMA.

[14]  T Fahey,et al.  Accuracy and impact of risk assessment in the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: a systematic review , 2006, Heart.

[15]  T. Macdonald Preventing Chronic Diseases: A Vital Investment , 2006 .

[16]  Tom Fahey,et al.  Predictive accuracy of the Framingham coronary risk score in British men:prospective cohort study , 2003, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[17]  P. Bossuyt,et al.  The diagnostic odds ratio: a single indicator of test performance. , 2003, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[18]  M. Linton,et al.  A practical approach to risk assessment to prevent coronary artery disease and its complications. , 2003, The American journal of cardiology.

[19]  H. Tunstall-Pedoe,et al.  Estimation of ten-year risk of fatal cardiovascular disease in Europe: the SCORE project. , 2003, European heart journal.

[20]  G. Assmann,et al.  Simple Scoring Scheme for Calculating the Risk of Acute Coronary Events Based on the 10-Year Follow-Up of the Prospective Cardiovascular Münster (PROCAM) Study , 2002, Circulation.

[21]  Nitesh V. Chawla,et al.  SMOTE: Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique , 2002, J. Artif. Intell. Res..

[22]  R. Holman,et al.  The UKPDS risk engine: a model for the risk of coronary heart disease in Type II diabetes (UKPDS 56). , 2001, Clinical science.

[23]  P. Mitchell,et al.  Prevalence of open-angle glaucoma in Australia. The Blue Mountains Eye Study. , 1996, Ophthalmology.

[24]  G. Dumitru,et al.  Risk factors for cardiovascular disease , 2018, Oxford Medicine Online.