Fuzzy-Logic Based Speed Control of Induction Motor Considering Core Loss into Account

Rotor flux and torque of an induction motor (IM) are decoupled to obtain performance of DC motor. The decoupling strategy has been developed in terms of stator current components where the core loss is neglected. Many different controllers including fuzzy logic controller (FLC) with neglecting core loss have been designed to control the speed of induction motor. The outcome of investigation about the effect of core loss on indirect field oriented control (IFOC) has been concluded that the actual flux and torque are not reached to the reference flux and torque if core loss is neglected. Thus, the purpose of this paper is to propose a fuzzy logic speed controller of induction motor where flux and torque decoupling strategy is decoupled in terms of magnetizing current instead of stator current to alleviate the effects of core loss. The performances of proposed fuzzy-logic-based controller have been verified by computer simulation. The simulation of speed control of IM using PI and FLC are performed. The simulation study for high-performance control of IM drive shows the superiority of the proposed fuzzy logic controller over the conventional PI controller.

[1]  Mohammad Abdul Mannan,et al.  Indirect field oriented control for high performance induction motor drives using space vector modulation with consideration of core loss , 2003, IEEE 34th Annual Conference on Power Electronics Specialist, 2003. PESC '03..

[2]  Satean Tunyasrirut,et al.  Fuzzy Logic Control for a Speed Control of Induction Motor using Space Vector Pulse Width Modulation , 2007 .

[3]  Dr. Hans Hellendoorn,et al.  An Introduction to Fuzzy Control , 1996, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[4]  E. Levi Impact of iron loss on behaviour of vector controlled induction machines , 1994, Proceedings of 1994 IEEE Industry Applications Society Annual Meeting.

[5]  Emil Levi,et al.  Iron loss in rotor-flux-oriented induction machines: identification, assessment of detuning, and compensation , 1996 .

[6]  S. Nasar,et al.  Vector control of AC drives , 1992 .

[7]  Emil Levi ROTOR FLUX ORIENTED CONTROL OF INDUCTION MACHINES CONSIDERING THE CORE LOSS , 1996 .

[8]  Bimal K. Bose Motion control technology: present and future , 1985 .

[9]  Emil Levi Impact of iron loss on behaviour of vector controlled induction machines , 1994 .

[10]  T. S. Radwan,et al.  Performances of novel fuzzy logic based indirect vector control for induction motor drive , 2000, Conference Record of the 2000 IEEE Industry Applications Conference. Thirty-Fifth IAS Annual Meeting and World Conference on Industrial Applications of Electrical Energy (Cat. No.00CH37129).

[11]  R.D. Lorenz,et al.  A simplified approach to continuous, online tuning of field oriented induction machine drives , 1988, Conference Record of the 1988 IEEE Industry Applications Society Annual Meeting.

[12]  Fumio Harashima,et al.  Multimicroprocessor-Based Control System for Quick Response Induction Motor Drive , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications.

[13]  S. A. Nasar,et al.  Unified treatment of core losses and saturation in the orthogonal-axis model of electric machines , 1987 .

[14]  R. Krishnan,et al.  Electric Motor Drives: Modeling, Analysis, and Control , 2001 .

[15]  Ying-Yu Tzou,et al.  Fuzzy-tuning current-vector control of a three-phase PWM inverter for high-performance AC drives , 1998, IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron..

[16]  Peter Vas,et al.  Electrical Machines and Drives: A Space-Vector Theory Approach , 1993 .

[17]  Bimal K. Bose,et al.  Power Electronics and Variable Frequency Drives , 1996 .

[18]  R. Marino,et al.  Adaptive input-output linearizing control of induction motors , 1993, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[19]  Chee-Mun. Ong,et al.  Dynamic simulation of electric machinery : using MATLAB/SIMULINK , 1997 .