Patient and caregiver outcomes 12 months after home-based therapy for hip fracture: a randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE To compare the effect of early discharge and home-based therapy with conventional hospital rehabilitation on patient and caregiver outcomes at 12 months after hip fracture. DESIGN Randomized controlled trial. SETTING Acute and subacute care with follow-up in a community setting in Australia. PARTICIPANTS Sixty-six older adults admitted to acute care after hip fracture who were assessed as needing rehabilitation. INTERVENTIONS Eligible patients were randomized to either home-based (n=34) or hospital (n=32) rehabilitation. Patients assigned to the home-based group were discharged home within 48 hours of randomization. Patients assigned to hospital rehabilitation received usual care. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Modified Barthel Index (MBI), timed up and go (TUG) test, Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36), and Caregiver Strain Index. RESULTS At 12 months, 56 of 66 (85%) participants were available for follow-up assessment. Both groups achieved significant improvements in MBI and TUG test scores. Patients in both groups had a significant decline in the physical score of the SF-36 and there were no differences between groups. Caregivers of patients allocated to receive home-based therapy reported a reduction in burden after 12 months. Over that period, there was a significant reduction in the burden for caregivers of those patients who received home rehabilitation (P=.020). CONCLUSION For patients who were previously functionally independent and living in the community, early return home with increased involvement of caregivers after hip fracture resulted in similar patient outcomes (home vs hospital) and less caregiver burden at 12 months.

[1]  B Cooper,et al.  Improving the sensitivity of the Barthel Index for stroke rehabilitation. , 1989, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[2]  R. Madhok,et al.  Geriatric rehabilitation following fractures in older people: a systematic review. , 2000, Health technology assessment.

[3]  John E. Ware,et al.  SF-36 physical and mental health summary scales : a user's manual , 1994 .

[4]  O. Corrado Caring for older hospital-at-home patients. , 2000, Age and ageing.

[5]  M. Crotty,et al.  Home rehabilitation for older adults with fractured hips: how many will take part? , 2000, Journal of quality in clinical practice.

[6]  Diane Podsiadlo,et al.  The Timed “Up & Go”: A Test of Basic Functional Mobility for Frail Elderly Persons , 1991, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[7]  M. Crotty,et al.  Early discharge and home rehabilitation after hip fracture achieves functional improvements: a randomized controlled trial , 2002, Clinical rehabilitation.

[8]  K. Jolly,et al.  Coronary artery stents in the treatment of ischaemic heart disease: a rapid and systematic review. , 2000, Health technology assessment.

[9]  K. Wright,et al.  Peterborough Hospital at Home: an evaluation. , 1991, Journal of public health medicine.

[10]  B. C. Robinson Validation of a Caregiver Strain Index. , 1983, Journal of gerontology.

[11]  M. Tinetti,et al.  Systematic home-based physical and functional therapy for older persons after hip fracture. , 1997, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[12]  S Shepperd,et al.  Hospital at home versus in-patient hospital care. , 2005, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.