Accuracy of the Justy II Apex locator in determining working length in simulated horizontal and vertical fractures.

AIM To study the effectiveness of an electronic apex locator (EAL; Justy II; Yoshida Dentcraft, Tokyo, Japan) in locating simulated horizontal and vertical fractures in single roots. METHODOLOGY An EAL was used to measure the distance within the canal of horizontal (n = 31) and vertical (n = 31) fractures, created with a disk in single-rooted teeth. Accuracy of the EAL was evaluated by comparing the measurements with those made using a size 10 file. Data were analysed with the non-parametric Passing and Bablok method. RESULTS For simulated horizontal fractures, the EAL measured exactly the same length as a size 10 file, without constant or proportional errors. In vertical simulated fractures, the EAL measured (on average) with a constant error of 7.5 mm shorter than the size 10 file; the difference had a wide confidence interval (-72.3 to 2.6 mm). CONCLUSIONS In this laboratory study, the Justy II EAL was able to determine accurately the position of simulated horizontal fractures, but was unreliable when measuring simulated vertical fractures.

[1]  Z. Fuss,et al.  Determination of location of root perforations by electronic apex locators. , 1996, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics.

[2]  J. C. Donnelly.  A simplified model to demonstrate the operation of electronic root canal measuring devices. , 1993, Journal of endodontics.

[3]  Y. Nahmias,et al.  Expanded use of the electronic canal length measuring devices. , 1983, Journal of endodontics.

[4]  W A Walker,et al.  An in vitro evaluation of the accuracy of the root ZX in the presence of various irrigants. , 2001, Journal of endodontics.

[5]  C. Splieth,et al.  Comparison of measurements obtained with hand files or the Canal Leader attached to electronic apex locators: an in vitro study. , 1999, International endodontic journal.

[6]  W. Bablok,et al.  A New Biometrical Procedure for Testing the Equality of Measurements from Two Different Analytical Methods. Application of linear regression procedures for method comparison studies in Clinical Chemistry, Part I , 1983, Journal of clinical chemistry and clinical biochemistry. Zeitschrift fur klinische Chemie und klinische Biochemie.

[7]  L. Huang,et al.  An experimental study of the principle of electronic root canal measurement. , 1987, Journal of endodontics.

[8]  Z. Fuss,et al.  Reliability of different electronic apex locators to detect root perforations in vitro. , 1997, International endodontic journal.

[9]  H. Ounsi,et al.  In vitro evaluation of the reliability of the Endex electronic apex locator. , 1998, Journal of endodontics.

[10]  K. Gulabivala,et al.  A comparison of the dentine-removing characteristics of two endosonic units. , 1993, International endodontic journal.

[11]  L Vajrabhaya,et al.  Accuracy of apex locator. , 1997, Endodontics & dental traumatology.

[12]  C Kobayashi,et al.  Electronic canal length measurement. , 1995, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics.

[13]  J. C. Donnelly,et al.  An in vitro test of a simplified model to demonstrate the operation of electronic root canal measuring devices. , 1994, Journal of endodontics.

[14]  T. Baccetti,et al.  A SEM study of in vivo accuracy of the Root ZX electronic apex locator. , 1998, Journal of endodontics.

[15]  J. C. Donnelly,et al.  In vitro evaluation of the accuracy of several electronic apex locators. , 1995, Journal of endodontics.

[16]  F. Goldberg,et al.  Effectiveness of different obturation techniques in the filling of simulated lateral canals. , 2001, Journal of endodontics.

[17]  V. Faus,et al.  An in vivo comparative study of two apex locators. , 1994, Journal of endodontics.

[18]  E. Rivera,et al.  Accuracy of the Endex with variations in canal irrigants and foramen size. , 1993, Journal of endodontics.

[19]  D. H. Pratten,et al.  Comparison of radiographic and electronic working lengths. , 1996, Journal of endodontics.