Abusive head trauma: differentiation between impact and non-impact cases based on neuroimaging findings and skeletal surveys.

[1]  A. Kemp,et al.  Retinal haemorrhages and related findings in abusive and non-abusive head trauma: a systematic review , 2013, Eye.

[2]  O. Arthurs,et al.  Post-mortem skeletal surveys in suspected non-accidental injury. , 2012, Clinical radiology.

[3]  N. Barrowman,et al.  Clinical and Radiographic Characteristics Associated With Abusive and Nonabusive Head Trauma: A Systematic Review , 2012, Pediatrics.

[4]  R. Reading.  Neuroimaging: what neuroradiological features distinguish abusive from non‐abusive head trauma? A systematic review , 2012 .

[5]  Jeannette M. Perez-Rossello,et al.  Prevalence of the classic metaphyseal lesion in infants at low versus high risk for abuse. , 2011, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[6]  R. Berger,et al.  Use of Skeletal Surveys to Evaluate for Physical Abuse: Analysis of 703 Consecutive Skeletal Surveys , 2011, Pediatrics.

[7]  A. McKinney.  Value of Cerebral Microhemorrhages Detected with Susceptibility-weighted MR Imaging for Prediction of Long-term Outcome in Children with Nonaccidental Trauma , 2011 .

[8]  C. Adamsbaum,et al.  Abusive Head Trauma: Judicial Admissions Highlight Violent and Repetitive Shaking , 2010, Pediatrics.

[9]  U. Lips,et al.  Shaken baby syndrome in Switzerland: results of a prospective follow-up study, 2002–2007 , 2010, European Journal of Pediatrics.

[10]  D. Farewell,et al.  What neuroimaging should be performed in children in whom inflicted brain injury (iBI) is suspected? A systematic review. , 2009, Clinical radiology.

[11]  C. Christian,et al.  Abusive Head Trauma in Infants and Children , 2009, Pediatrics.

[12]  D. Greenes,et al.  Can the initial history predict whether a child with a head injury has been abused? , 2003, Pediatrics.