Predictive XR Telepresence for Robotic Operations in Space

This paper proposes a new method for robotic teleoperation scenarios with significant time delay utilizing Extended Reality (XR) technologies, specifically for Lunar base assembly and maintenance. Traditional teleoperation interfaces interpret commands sent through a desktop computer screen and are limited in providing spatial awareness cues. Additionally, the software often has difficulty in accounting for a time delay or providing intuitive techniques for human-robot interaction (HRI). This paper presents a new XR interface for robotic teleoperation using a predictive 3D simulated virtual environment developed using the SpaceCRAFT platform. SpaceCRAFT is a multiuser Virtual Reality (VR) and Augmented Reality (AR) systems engineering toolbox software that allows for worldwide collaboration on design and test of space systems. SpaceCRAFT provides the operator a virtual interface to the robot represented through three different states, a Virtual Command State (VCS), Predicted Current State (PCS), and Time Delayed State (TDS). To improve situational awareness and the PCS representation of the robot, SpaceCRAFT processes LIDAR and RGB camera data to create a constantly updating 3D point cloud representation of the remote environment. An experiment involving teleoperation of a 3D printed robotic manipulator was run, with a simulated time delay similar to that between the Earth and the Moon. Results demonstrate that the predictive approach provides an effective and flexible method of robot teleoperation that helps achieve successful task completion, even with a large time delay.

[1]  Morgan Quigley,et al.  ROS: an open-source Robot Operating System , 2009, ICRA 2009.

[2]  Ken Goldberg,et al.  Deep Imitation Learning for Complex Manipulation Tasks from Virtual Reality Teleoperation , 2017, ICRA.

[3]  Tomás de Jesús Mateo Sanguino,et al.  50 years of rovers for planetary exploration: A retrospective review for future directions , 2017, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[4]  Xingjian Wang,et al.  Teleoperation Control Based on Combination of Wave Variable and Neural Networks , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems.

[5]  Ronald Azuma,et al.  A Survey of Augmented Reality , 1997, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[6]  D. W. F. van Krevelen,et al.  A Survey of Augmented Reality Technologies, Applications and Limitations , 2010, Int. J. Virtual Real..

[7]  Prahlad Vadakkepat,et al.  Humanoid Robotics: A Reference , 2018 .

[8]  Dieter Fox,et al.  DexPilot: Vision-Based Teleoperation of Dexterous Robotic Hand-Arm System , 2019, 2020 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA).

[9]  Gordon Clapworthy,et al.  Virtual reality tools for Internet robotics , 2001, Proceedings 2001 ICRA. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.01CH37164).

[10]  Jeffrey J. Biesiadecki,et al.  Tradeoffs Between Directed and Autonomous Driving on the Mars Exploration Rovers , 2007, ISRR.

[11]  P. Milgram,et al.  A Taxonomy of Mixed Reality Visual Displays , 1994 .

[12]  Holly A. Yanco,et al.  Improving Human-Robot Interaction through Interface Evolution , 2010 .

[13]  Antonio Barrientos,et al.  Application of immersive technologies and natural language to hyper-redundant robot teleoperation , 2019, Virtual Reality.

[14]  Xiaofeng Wu,et al.  UnrealNavigation: Simulation Software for testing SLAM in Virtual Reality , 2020 .

[15]  Doug A. Bowman,et al.  An evaluation of techniques for grabbing and manipulating remote objects in immersive virtual environments , 1997, SI3D.

[16]  Thomas Hulin,et al.  Model Mediated Teleoperation with a Hand-Arm Exoskeleton in Long Time Delays Using Reinforcement Learning , 2020, 2020 29th IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN).

[17]  Alin Albu-Schäffer,et al.  KONTUR-2: Force-feedback teleoperation from the international space station , 2016, 2016 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA).

[18]  Thomas B. Sheridan TELEOPERATION, TELEROBOTICS, AND TELEPRESENCE: A PROGRESS REPORT , 1993 .

[19]  Robert R. Burridge,et al.  Using prediction to enhance remote robot supervision across time delay , 2009, 2009 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[20]  Doug A. Bowman,et al.  Overcoming World in Miniature Limitations by a Scaled and Scrolling WIM , 2006, 3D User Interfaces (3DUI'06).

[21]  Andrew B. Williams,et al.  Multirobot task allocation in lunar mission construction scenarios , 2005, 2005 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics.

[22]  Kangsoo Kim,et al.  Revisiting Trends in Augmented Reality Research: A Review of the 2nd Decade of ISMAR (2008–2017) , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[23]  Markus Wilde,et al.  Predictive Human-Machine Interface for Teleoperation of Air and Space Vehicles over Time Delay , 2020, 2020 IEEE Aerospace Conference.

[24]  Jee-Hwan Ryu,et al.  Closing the Force Loop to Enhance Transparency in Time-delayed Teleoperation , 2020, 2020 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA).

[25]  Sachin Chitta,et al.  MoveIt! [ROS Topics] , 2012, IEEE Robotics Autom. Mag..