The prognostic factors for patients with early cervical cancer treated by radical hysterectomy and postoperative radiotherapy.

PURPOSE This study was undertaken to evaluate the efficacy of postoperative radiotherapy (post-OP RT) and to investigate the prognostic factors for early-stage cervical cancer patients who were treated by radical surgery, and the pathological findings suggested a relatively high risk of relapse with surgery alone. MATERIALS AND METHODS From January 1990 to December 1995, 222 patients with stage IB-IIA cervical cancer, treated by radical surgery and a full course of post-OP RT, were included in this study. The indications for post-OP RT were based on pathological findings, including lymph node metastasis, positive surgical margins, parametrial extension, lymphovascular permeation, and invasion of more than two-thirds of the cervical wall thickness. The radiation dose of external beam was 44-45 Gy to the whole pelvis and 50-54 Gy to the true pelvis. One hundred seventy-two patients also received intravaginal brachytherapy as a local boost. The minimal follow-up period was 2 years. RESULTS The actuarial 5-year overall and disease-specific survival rates for all patients were 76 and 82%, respectively. The tumor control rate within the pelvis reached 94%, and distant metastasis was the major cause of treatment failure. Univariate analysis of clinical and pathological parameters revealed that clinical stage, bulky tumor size, positive lymph nodes, parametrial extension, and histologic type were significant prognostic factors. After multivariate analysis, only positive lymph nodes (P = 0.01), bulky tumor size (P = 0.02), and parametrial extension (P = 0.05) independently influenced the disease-specific survival (DSS). For patients with lymph node metastasis, the number and location of the nodal involvement significantly affected the prognosis. The 5-year DSS for patients with no, one, and more than one lymph node metastasis were 87, 84, and 61% (P = 0.0001), respectively. Patients with upper pelvic lymph node metastasis had a higher incidence of distant metastasis (50% vs 16% in lower pelvic node group, P = 0.03). In the subgroup of single lower pelvic nodal metastasis, the prognosis was similar to that of patients without lymph node involvement (5-year DSS 85% vs 87%, P = 0.71). CONCLUSION Our results indicate that post-OP RT can achieve very good local control in stage IB-IIA cervical cancer patients whose pathological findings show risk features for relapse after radical surgery. The prognostic factors for treatment failure identified in this study can be used as selection criteria for clinical trials to test the effects of other adjuvant treatments, such as chemotherapy. Patients with a single lower pelvic lymph node metastasis have a relatively good prognosis and may not need adjuvant treatment beyond radiation therapy.

[1]  K. Ng,et al.  Preoperative prognostic variables and the impact of postoperative adjuvant therapy on the outcomes of stage IB or II cervical carcinoma patients with or without pelvic lymph node metastases , 1999, Cancer.

[2]  J. Hong,et al.  The prognostic significance of pre- and posttreatment SCC levels in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix treated by radiotherapy. , 1998, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[3]  A. Stewart,et al.  Trends in the use of radiation and chemotherapy in the initial management of patients with carcinoma of the uterine cervix. , 1998, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[4]  Y. Soong,et al.  A randomized trial of concurrent chemoradiotherapy versus radiotherapy in advanced carcinoma of the uterine cervix. , 1997, Gynecologic oncology.

[5]  J. Schorge,et al.  Stage IB and IIA cervical cancer with negative lymph nodes: the role of adjuvant radiotherapy after radical hysterectomy. , 1997, Gynecologic oncology.

[6]  A. Porter,et al.  Postoperative radiation for cervical cancer with pathologic risk factors. , 1997, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[7]  D A Bloch,et al.  Surgically defined prognostic parameters in patients with early cervical carcinoma: A multivariate survival tree analysis , 1996, Cancer.

[8]  R. Kryscio,et al.  Lymph node metastases and prognosis in patients with stage IA2 cervical cancer. , 1996, Gynecologic oncology.

[9]  D. Winchester,et al.  Hysterectomy in invasive cervical cancer: a national patterns of care study of the American College of Surgeons. , 1996, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[10]  Ho-Hsiung Lin,et al.  Risk Factors for Recurrence in Patients With Stage IB, IIA, and IIB Cervical Carcinoma After Radical Hysterectomy and Postoperative Pelvic Irradiation , 1996, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[11]  E. Venkatraman,et al.  Adjuvant chemotherapy versus chemotherapy plus pelvic irradiation for high-risk cervical cancer patients after radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy (RH-PLND): a randomized phase III trial. , 1996, Gynecologic oncology.

[12]  Ying-jv Lu,et al.  Prognostic factors of early stage cervical cancer treated by radical hysterectomy , 1995, Cancer.

[13]  T. Inoue,et al.  Long-term observation of patients treated by postoperative extended-field irradiation for nodal metastases from cervical carcinoma stages IB, IIA, and IIB. , 1995, Gynecologic oncology.

[14]  M. Ozsahin,et al.  Postoperative radiotherapy in carcinoma of the cervix: treatment results and prognostic factors. , 1995, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[15]  T. Pajak,et al.  Toxicity criteria of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) , 1995, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[16]  S. Kalnicki,et al.  Node-positive cervical cancer: impact of pelvic irradiation and patterns of failure. , 1995, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[17]  S. Hsueh,et al.  Prognostic factors and impacts of adjuvant therapy in early-stage cervical carcinoma with pelvic node metastases. , 1993, Gynecologic oncology.

[18]  H. Nakano,et al.  Multivariate analysis of the histopathologic prognostic factors of cervical cancer in patients undergoing radical hysterectomy , 1992, Cancer.

[19]  J. Bouma,et al.  Prognostic significance of single versus multiple lymph node metastases in cervical carcinoma stage IB. , 1990, Gynecologic oncology.

[20]  B. Sevin,et al.  Prospective surgical-pathological study of disease-free interval in patients with stage IB squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. , 1990, Gynecologic oncology.

[21]  T. Inoue,et al.  The prognostic significance of number of positive nodes in cervical carcinoma stages IB, IIA, and IIB , 1990, Cancer.

[22]  P. Disaia,et al.  A prospective surgical pathological study of stage I squamous carcinoma of the cervix: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. , 1989, Gynecologic oncology.

[23]  S. Soong,et al.  Value of adjuvant whole-pelvis irradiation after Wertheim hysterectomy for early-stage squamous carcinoma of the cervix with pelvic nodal metastasis: a matched-control study. , 1989, Gynecologic oncology.

[24]  P. Disaia,et al.  Survival and patterns of recurrence in cervical cancer metastatic to periaortic lymph nodes (a Gynecologic Oncology Group study). , 1984, Gynecologic oncology.

[25]  T. Iversen,et al.  Stage IB Carcinoma of the Cervix, The Norwegian Radium Hospital. II. Results when Pelvic Nodes Are Involved , 1982, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[26]  G. Delgado Stage IB squamous cancer of the cervix: the choice of treatment. , 1978, Obstetrical & gynecological survey.