New energy based approach to predict seismic demands of steel moment resisting frames subjected to near-fault ground motions

This article proposes a new energy-based approach for predicting seismic demands of steel structures at the near-fault sites by introducing the concept of dissipated hysteretic input energy during largest yield excursion (ΔEh). It is defined as the amount of hysteretic energy demand imposed on a structure over a finite time interval between two zero-crossing of bow system velocity. The proposed energy measure, which is dependent both on the characteristics of ground motions and structural system, is shown to be well correlated to the maximum inelastic displacement. In order to estimate the maximum global displacement of a MDOF system to near-fault ground motions, a new procedure is proposed. The steps of proposed methodology are quite similar to those of the Modified Modal Pushover Analysis (MMPA) method. The determination of the peak global displacement demand, however, is based on a different concept. In contrast to other energy-based procedures, this displacement is an actual value equalizing ΔEh to static monotonic hysteretic energy. Finally, the accuracy of the method was evaluated when response values were compared to the results from nonlinear dynamic analysis. There are good correlations between results of these two methods. Indeed more accurate results in capturing seismic demands of typical steel moment resisting frames subjected to near-fault ground motions in comparison with the procedure proposed in ASCE 41-06 are achieved.

[1]  C. Uang,et al.  Evaluation of seismic energy in structures , 1990 .

[2]  Hiroshi Akiyama,et al.  Seismic Design of Steel Buildings , 1982 .

[3]  Asimina Athanatopoulou,et al.  Static Pushover Analysis Based on an Energy-Equivalent SDOF System , 2011 .

[4]  Ming Wei Liu,et al.  An upper-bound pushover analysis procedure for estimating the seismic demands of high-rise buildings , 2004 .

[5]  Nicolas Luco,et al.  Structure-Specific Scalar Intensity Measures for Near-Source and Ordinary Earthquake Ground Motions , 2007 .

[6]  Anil K. Chopra,et al.  A modal pushover analysis procedure for estimating seismic demands for buildings , 2002 .

[7]  Sashi K. Kunnath,et al.  Effects of Fling Step and Forward Directivity on Seismic Response of Buildings , 2006 .

[8]  Yi Jiang,et al.  A modified approach of energy balance concept based multimode pushover analysis to estimate seismic demands for buildings , 2010 .

[9]  Anil K. Chopra,et al.  Evaluation of a Modified MPA Procedure Assuming Higher Modes as Elastic to Estimate Seismic Demands , 2004 .

[10]  Dimitrios Vamvatsikos,et al.  Incremental dynamic analysis , 2002 .

[11]  A. Davoudi,et al.  An adaptive pushover procedure based on effective modal mass combination rule , 2013 .

[12]  Fahim Sadek,et al.  Distribution of Earthquake Input Energy in Structures , 2003 .

[13]  Anil K. Chopra,et al.  Dynamics of Structures: Theory and Applications to Earthquake Engineering , 1995 .

[14]  Michel Bruneau,et al.  Some aspects of energy methods for the inelastic seismic response of ductile SDOF structures , 1996 .

[15]  Sashi K. Kunnath,et al.  Adaptive Spectra-Based Pushover Procedure for Seismic Evaluation of Structures , 2000 .

[16]  Mohtasham Mohebbi,et al.  An adaptive modal pushover procedure for asymmetric-plan buildings , 2012 .

[17]  Sashi K. Kunnath,et al.  Effective Cyclic Energy as a Measure of Seismic Demand , 2007 .

[18]  Sashi K. Kunnath,et al.  Assessment of current nonlinear static procedures for seismic evaluation of buildings , 2007 .

[19]  Dimitrios Vamvatsikos,et al.  Performing incremental dynamic analysis in parallel , 2011 .