Quantification of breast density with dual energy mammography: a simulation study.

Breast density, the percentage of glandular breast tissue, has been identified as an important yet underutilized risk factor in the development of breast cancer. A quantitative method to measure breast density with dual energy imaging was investigated using a computer simulation model. Two configurations to measure breast density were evaluated: the usage of monoenergetic beams and an ideal detector, and the usage of polyenergetic beams with spectra from a tungsten anode x-ray tube with a detector modeled after a digital mammography system. The simulation model calculated the mean glandular dose necessary to quantify the variability of breast density to within 1/3%. The breast was modeled as a semicircle 10 cm in radius with equal homogenous thicknesses of adipose and glandular tissues. Breast thicknesses were considered in the range of 2-10 cm and energies in the range of 10-150 keV for the two monoenergetic beams, and 20-150 kVp for spectra with a tungsten anode x-ray tube. For a 4.2 cm breast thickness, the required mean glandular doses were 0.183 microGy for two monoenergetic beams at 19 and 71 keV, and 9.85 microGy for two polyenergetic spectra from a tungsten anode at 32 and 96 kVp with beam filtrations of 50 microm Rh and 300 microm Cu for the low and high energy beams, respectively. The results suggest that for either configuration, breast density can be precisely measured with dual energy imaging requiring only a small amount of additional dose to the breast. The possibility of using a standard screening mammogram as the low energy image is also discussed.

[1]  Karla Kerlikowske,et al.  Novel use of Single X-Ray Absorptiometry for Measuring Breast Density , 2005, Technology in cancer research & treatment.

[2]  Michael Brady,et al.  A Representation for Mammographic Image Processing , 1995, CVRMed.

[3]  N. Boyd,et al.  Mammographic density and the risk and detection of breast cancer. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[4]  J. Wolfe Breast patterns as an index of risk for developing breast cancer. , 1976, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[5]  A. Macovski,et al.  Energy-selective reconstructions in X-ray computerised tomography , 1976, Physics in medicine and biology.

[6]  A Fenster,et al.  Dual-energy mammography: initial experimental results. , 1985, Medical physics.

[7]  Andreas Höfer,et al.  Ein Programm für die Berechnung von diagnostischen Röntgenspektren , 1985 .

[8]  J. Boone,et al.  Glandular breast dose for monoenergetic and high-energy X-ray beams: Monte Carlo assessment. , 1999, Radiology.

[9]  Karla Kerlikowske,et al.  Clinical comparison of a novel breast DXA technique to mammographic density. , 2006, Medical physics.

[10]  Yao-Jin Qian,et al.  A digital filtration technique for scatter-glare correction based on thickness estimation , 1995, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[11]  J. Kaufhold,et al.  A calibration approach to glandular tissue composition estimation in digital mammography. , 2002, Medical physics.

[12]  M Gambaccini,et al.  Dual-energy imaging in full-field digital mammography: a phantom study. , 2003, Physics in medicine and biology.

[13]  M. Giger,et al.  Computerized analysis of mammographic parenchymal patterns for breast cancer risk assessment: feature selection. , 2000, Medical physics.

[14]  N. Boyd,et al.  The quantitative analysis of mammographic densities. , 1994, Physics in medicine and biology.

[15]  G S Shaber,et al.  Dual-energy mammography: a detector analysis. , 1990, Medical physics.

[16]  Xinming Liu,et al.  A dual-energy subtraction technique for microcalcification imaging in digital mammography--a signal-to-noise analysis. , 2002, Medical physics.

[17]  J. S. Laughlin,et al.  Absorbed radiation dose in mammography. , 1979, Radiology.

[18]  Sabee Molloi,et al.  Scatter-glare estimation for digital radiographic systems: comparison of digital filtration and sampling techniques , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[19]  J A Rowlands,et al.  X-ray imaging using amorphous selenium: determination of Swank factor by pulse height spectroscopy. , 1998, Medical physics.

[20]  J A Rowlands,et al.  Digital radiology using active matrix readout of amorphous selenium: theoretical analysis of detective quantum efficiency. , 1997, Medical physics.

[21]  N. Boyd,et al.  Automated analysis of mammographic densities. , 1996, Physics in medicine and biology.

[22]  J. Wolfe,et al.  Mammographic parenchymal patterns and quantitative evaluation of mammographic densities: a case-control study. , 1987, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[23]  Dan Rico,et al.  A volumetric method for estimation of breast density on digitized screen-film mammograms. , 2003, Medical physics.

[24]  A R Cowen,et al.  Dual-energy digital mammography utilizing stimulated phosphor computed radiography. , 1994, Physics in medicine and biology.

[25]  Hirofumi Matsuura,et al.  Dual-energy subtraction mammography , 1995, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[26]  Xi Chen,et al.  Error Analysis of Calibration Materials on Dual-Energy Mammography , 2007, MICCAI.

[27]  John M Lewin,et al.  Dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital subtraction mammography: feasibility. , 2003, Radiology.

[28]  Performance characteristics of a dual-energy detector for digital scan projection radiography. , 1987, Medical physics.

[29]  A. Miller,et al.  Quantitative classification of mammographic densities and breast cancer risk: results from the Canadian National Breast Screening Study. , 1995, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[30]  J. Boone Normalized glandular dose (DgN) coefficients for arbitrary X-ray spectra in mammography: computer-fit values of Monte Carlo derived data. , 2002, Medical physics.

[31]  John A Shepherd,et al.  Measurement of breast density with dual X-ray absorptiometry: feasibility. , 2002, Radiology.

[32]  Gisella Gennaro,et al.  Dose comparison between screen/film and full-field digital mammography , 2006, European Radiology.

[33]  K Bliznakova,et al.  Dual-energy mammography: simulation studies. , 2006, Physics in medicine and biology.

[34]  J A Seibert,et al.  X-ray scatter removal by deconvolution. , 1988, Medical physics.

[35]  Lubomir M. Hadjiiski,et al.  Computerized image analysis: estimation of breast density on mammograms. , 2001, Medical physics.

[36]  R E Alvarez Active energy selective image detector for dual-energy computed radiography. , 1996, Medical physics.

[37]  Tuenchit Khamapirad,et al.  Computing mammographic density from a multiple regression model constructed with image-acquisition parameters from a full-field digital mammographic unit , 2007, Physics in medicine and biology.

[38]  Heang-Ping Chan,et al.  Mammographic density measured with quantitative computer-aided method: comparison with radiologists' estimates and BI-RADS categories. , 2006, Radiology.

[40]  J M Boone,et al.  Comparison of x-ray cross sections for diagnostic and therapeutic medical physics. , 1996, Medical physics.

[41]  L Souhami,et al.  Radiation Therapy Oncology Group: radiosurgery quality assurance guidelines. , 1993, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[42]  Pierre-Edouard Sottas,et al.  Semiautomatic mammographic parenchymal patterns classification using multiple statistical features. , 2007, Academic radiology.

[43]  Chris C. Shaw,et al.  Comparison of three tissue composition measurement techniques using digital mammograms — A signal-to-noise study , 2009, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[44]  John M Boone,et al.  Grid and slot scan scatter reduction in mammography: comparison by using Monte Carlo techniques. , 2002, Radiology.

[45]  G T Barnes,et al.  Mammography grid performance. , 1999, Radiology.

[46]  S. Kappadath,et al.  Quantitative evaluation of dual-energy digital mammography for calcification imaging. , 2004, Physics in medicine and biology.

[47]  Daniel B Kopans,et al.  Basic physics and doubts about relationship between mammographically determined tissue density and breast cancer risk. , 2008, Radiology.

[48]  R. Alvarez,et al.  Comparison of dual energy detector system performance. , 2004, Medical physics.

[49]  M J Yaffe,et al.  Theoretical optimization of dual-energy x-ray imaging with application to mammography. , 1985, Medical physics.

[50]  T. R. Fewell,et al.  Molybdenum, rhodium, and tungsten anode spectral models using interpolating polynomials with application to mammography. , 1997, Medical physics.

[51]  E. Roessl,et al.  On the influence of noise correlations in measurement data on basis image noise in dual-energylike x-ray imaging. , 2007, Medical physics.

[52]  David Gur,et al.  Comparison of three different techniques for dual-energy subtraction imaging in digital radiography: A signal-to-noise analysis , 2009, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[53]  C. Byrne,et al.  Studying mammographic density: implications for understanding breast cancer. , 1997, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[54]  Mats Danielsson,et al.  Single-shot dual-energy subtraction mammography with electronic spectrum splitting: feasibility. , 2006, European journal of radiology.

[55]  Theoretical analysis of error propagation in triple-energy absorptiometry: application to measurement of lead in bone in vivo. , 1997, Medical physics.

[56]  J J Heine,et al.  A statistical methodology for mammographic density detection. , 2000, Medical physics.

[57]  G T Barnes,et al.  An energy sensitive cassette for dual-energy mammography. , 1989, Medical physics.

[58]  M Gambaccini,et al.  Dual-energy tissue cancellation in mammography with quasi-monochromatic x-rays. , 2002, Physics in medicine and biology.

[59]  D. Gauntt,et al.  X-ray tube potential, filtration, and detector considerations in dual-energy chest radiography. , 1994, Medical physics.

[60]  M Ishida,et al.  Breast imaging: dual-energy projection radiography with digital radiography. , 1987, Radiology.

[61]  Masatoshi Saito,et al.  Dual-energy approach to contrast-enhanced mammography using the balanced filter method: spectral optimization and preliminary phantom measurement. , 2007, Medical physics.

[62]  Alberto Bravin,et al.  Evaluation of the minimum iodine concentration for contrast-enhanced subtraction mammography , 2006, Physics in medicine and biology.

[63]  Karla Kerlikowske,et al.  The mammogram that cried Wolfe. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[64]  E. Sickles,et al.  Wolfe mammographic parenchymal patterns and breast cancer risk. , 2007, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.