Representations of science within children's trade books

The use of trade books in science instruction, particularly in the elementary and middle school grades, invites scrutiny into the ways in which trade books represent science and its practitioners to learners. Forty-four trade books were examined for their explicit and implicit representations of science. The majority of the sample was comprised of informational texts, followed by experiment books and artistic books. Scientific knowledge was generally represented as facts, with limited connections to the producers of those facts. Scientists and their practice were represented as experiment or observation, in descriptions that blurred the distinctions between levels of participation in science, and emphasized empirical data collection over analysis or theory development. Artistic books focused on nature encouraged an aesthetic approach to nature, primarily through creative observation. These books are not likely to convey a sophisticated image of the nature of science to young children without contextualization by teachers and other knowledgeable adults. However, they have potential as tools within inquiry contexts, if used in a manner authentic to goals for scientific literacy. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Res Sci Teach 43: 214–235, 2006

[1]  Mike U. Smith,et al.  Defining versus describing the nature of science: A pragmatic analysis for classroom teachers and science educators , 1999 .

[2]  J. Shea.  National Science Education Standards , 1995 .

[3]  R. Driver,et al.  The Pupil as Scientist , 1983 .

[4]  Joseph L. Polman,et al.  Why educate “little scientists?” Examining the potential of practice‐based scientific literacy , 2004 .

[5]  Wolff-Michael Roth,et al.  Differences in graph-related practices between high school biology textbooks and scientific ecology journals , 1999 .

[6]  S. Traweek,et al.  Beamtimes and Lifetimes: The World of High Energy Physicists , 1988 .

[7]  Stephen P. Norris,et al.  The Philosophical Basis of Observation in Science and Science Education. , 1985 .

[8]  Stephen P. Norris,et al.  How literacy in its fundamental sense is central to scientific literacy , 2003 .

[9]  Science Education and the Commonplaces of Science , 1999 .

[10]  Beth A. Connor,et al.  Integrating instruction of science, reading, and writing: Goals, teacher development, and assessment , 1994 .

[11]  M. Pressley,et al.  The effect of a literature-based program integrated into literacy and science instruction with children from diverse backgrounds , 1997 .

[12]  Thomas W. Shiland.  Quantum mechanics and conceptual change in high school chemistry textbooks , 1997 .

[13]  Larry D. Yore,et al.  The reading–science learning–writing connection: Breakthroughs, barriers, and promises , 1994 .

[14]  William Hare,et al.  Portraying science accurately in classrooms : Emphasizing open-mindedness rather than relativism , 2000 .

[15]  Stephen P. Norris,et al.  Interpreting pragmatic meaning when reading popular reports of science , 1994 .

[16]  Catherine Milne,et al.  Philosophically Correct Science Stories? Examining the Implications of Heroic Science Stories for School Science , 1998 .

[17]  James Paul Gee,et al.  Message from the “Island group”: What is literacy in science literacy? , 2003 .

[18]  Brian Alters,et al.  Whose nature of science , 1997 .

[19]  Larry D. Yore,et al.  Scientists as Writers , 2002 .

[20]  John L. Rudolph,et al.  Reconsidering the 'nature of science' as a curriculum component , 2000 .

[21]  Angela Calabrese Barton,et al.  Teaching Science with Homeless Children: Pedagogy, Representation, and Identity. , 1998 .

[22]  Judith A. Bazler,et al.  Are high school chemistry textbooks gender fair , 1991 .

[23]  A. Irwin,et al.  Historical case studies: Teaching the nature of science in context , 2000 .

[24]  Randy L. Bell,et al.  The nature of science and instructional practice: Making the unnatural natural , 1998 .

[25]  D. Kuhn.  Children and adults as intuitive scientists. , 1989, Psychological review.

[26]  W. Holliday.  Choosing Science Textbooks: Connecting Research to Common Sense , 2004 .

[27]  José María de Posada.  The presentation of metallic bonding in high school science textbooks during three decades: Science educational reforms and substantive changes of tendencies , 1999 .

[28]  Danielle J. Ford,et al.  Highly Recommended Trade Books: Can They Be Used in Inquiry Science? , 2004 .

[29]  D. Kevin O'Neill.  Knowing When You've Brought Them in: Scientific Genre Knowledge and Communities of Practice , 2001 .

[30]  J. Lemke.  Articulating communities: Sociocultural perspectives on science education , 2001 .