Does the type of ownership control matter? Evidence from China's listed companies

By tracing the identity of large shareholders, we group China's listed companies into those controlled by state asset management bureaus (SAMBs), state owned enterprises (SOEs) affiliated to the central government (SOECGs), SOEs affiliated to the local government (SOELGs), and Private investors. We argue that these distinct types of owners have different objectives and motivations and this will affect how they exercise their control rights over the firms they invest in. In particular, we contend that private ownership of listed firms in China is not necessarily superior to certain types of state ownership. To test our arguments we investigate the relative efficiency of state versus private ownership of listed firms and the efficiency of various forms of state ownership. The empirical results indicate that the operating efficiency of Chinese listed companies varies across the type of controlling shareholder. SOECG controlled firms perform best and SAMB and Private controlled firms perform worst. SOELG controlled firms are in the middle. The results are consistent with our predictions.

[1]  Michael Firth,et al.  Ownership structure, corporate governance, and fraud: Evidence from China , 2006 .

[2]  Andrei Shleifer,et al.  State Versus Private Ownership , 1998 .

[3]  Andrei Shleifer,et al.  A Theory of Privatisation , 1996 .

[4]  M. Firth,et al.  Control Transfers, Privatization, and Corporate Performance: Efficiency Gains in China's Listed Companies , 2008, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis.

[5]  Ferdinand A. Gul,et al.  Investment opportunity set, corporate governance practices and firm performance , 2004 .

[6]  A. Shleifer,et al.  A Theory of Privatization , 1996 .

[7]  W. Rogers Regression standard errors in clustered samples , 1994 .

[8]  Changyu Wang,et al.  Ownership and operating performance of Chinese IPOs , 2005 .

[9]  Feixue Xie,et al.  Ownership Structure and Firm Value in China's Privatized Firms: 1991-2001 , 2005 .

[10]  A. Shleifer,et al.  Large Shareholders and Corporate Control , 1986, Journal of Political Economy.

[11]  M. Harris,et al.  Corporate governance: Voting rights and majority rules , 1988 .

[12]  A. Shleifer,et al.  A Survey of Corporate Governance , 1996 .

[13]  Peter Schmidt,et al.  Estimation of Models with Jointly Dependent Qualitative Variables: A Simultaneous Logit Approach , 1975 .

[14]  V. Aivazian,et al.  Can corporatization improve the performance of state-owned enterprises even without privatization? , 2005 .

[15]  Kathryn L. Dewenter,et al.  State-Owned and Privately Owned Firms: An Empirical Analysis of Profitability, Leverage, and Labor Intensity , 2001 .

[16]  Weiying Zhang CHINA’S SOE REFORM: A CORPORATE GOVERNANCE PERSPECTIVE , 2006 .

[17]  M. Firth,et al.  Have China's enterprise reforms led to improved efficiency and profitability? , 2006 .

[18]  William L. Megginson,et al.  Forthcoming, Journal of Economic Literature FROM STATE TO MARKET: A SURVEY OF EMPIRICAL STUDIES ON PRIVATIZATION , 2000 .

[19]  Qian Sun,et al.  China share issue privatization: the extent of its success , 2003 .