A Fuzzy Approach for Assessing Transportation Infrastructure Security

The security of any transportation infrastructure can be defined as a combination of threat likelihood, infrastructure resilience, and consequence. In view of their inherently dynamic and highly unpredictable nature, threat likelihood and consequence data is difficult to determine with certainty. Due to this problem, this paper presents a new fuzzy methodology to qualitatively determine the overall security level, in terms of a security rating, for transportation infrastructure by duly considering the uncertainties of the environmental threats it faces, its resilience to damage, and the consequences of the infrastructure damage. The method is useful when data is unavailable or imprecise, allowing the security rating to be determined using a qualitative expert-assigned level that each factor contributes to overall security. The evaluation of the security factors are represented as fuzzy triangular numbers with accompanying membership rules that define the extent of contribution by each factor to overall infrastructure security. Through a case study, the paper applies the methodology to illustrate how general data can be used in the method to determine the overall security of specific infrastructure.

[1]  Duane Steffey Homeland Security and Transportation Risk , 2008 .

[2]  Samuel Labi,et al.  A multi-criteria methodology for measuring the resilience of transportation assets , 2016 .

[3]  S Bonsall,et al.  Use of Fuzzy Evidential Reasoning in Maritime Security Assessment , 2009, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[4]  Bilal M. Ayyub,et al.  Multicriteria Security System Performance Assessment Using Fuzzy Logic , 2007 .

[5]  Simon French,et al.  Encyclopedia of quantitative risk analysis and assessment , 2008 .

[6]  John V. Farr,et al.  Infrastructure Risk Analysis Model , 2000 .

[7]  Kash Barker,et al.  Resilience-based network component importance measures , 2013, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[8]  J Apps INTERNATIONAL PORT SECURITY PROGRAM , 2004 .

[9]  Mahdi Elahi,et al.  A Study of Consumer Preferences for Higher Education Institutes in Tehran through Conjoint Analysis , 2011 .

[10]  Samuel Labi,et al.  A Multi-Criteria Methodology for Measuring the Resilience of Transportation Assets and Prioritizing Security Investments , 2014 .

[11]  Morteza Yazdani,et al.  Risk Analysis for Critical Infrastructures Using Fuzzy TOPSIS , 2011 .

[12]  John D. Moteff Risk Management and Critical Infrastructure Protection: Assessing, Integrating, and Managing Threats, Vulnerabilities and Consequences [Updated February 4, 2005] , 2004 .

[13]  John D. Moteff Risk Management and Critical Infrastructure Protection: Assessing, Integrating, and Managing Threats, Vulnerabilities and Consequences , 2004 .

[14]  Z. L. Yang MARITIME SECURITY-ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT , 2007 .

[15]  Shahed Rowshan,et al.  Reducing Security Risk for Transportation Management Centers , 2005 .

[16]  Stephen P. Harris,et al.  Simulation modeling for maritime port security , 2013 .