Computerized Information Standards Enabling Innovation in Public Procurement of Buildings

Computerized and standardized information enables innovation in processes, products and services. Where early research on the impact of standards tended to focus on barriers, more recent research advocates standardisation as enabler of innovation albeit in a stakeholder-oriented, flexible manner. This paper asks whether computerized information standards enable or constrain innovation in public procurement of buildings. In architectural and engineering design of public buildings handling of information involves interoperability problems that hamper innovation. Moreover the project based product development tends be done in constellations of firms in interorganisational contracting, which do not provide stability or room for innovation. A large hospital project was investigated through interviews, documents and observations. The effects of implementing building information standards are both inter- and intraorganisational. The building client claims to have saved money, through better structured building component data that gave considerable positive effects during tendering. The IT-suppliers develop IT-tools, preparing for new markets.

[1]  Andrea Botero,et al.  From closed to open to what?: an exploration on community innovation principles , 2009, MindTrek '09.

[2]  Marco Winckler,et al.  Human-Computer Interaction - INTERACT 2011 - 13th IFIP TC 13 International Conference, Lisbon, Portugal, September 5-9, 2011, Proceedings, Part III , 2011, INTERACT.

[3]  Melissa A. Schilling Strategic Management of Technological Innovation , 2004 .

[4]  Susan V. Scott,et al.  10 Sociomateriality: Challenging the Separation of Technology, Work and Organization , 2008 .

[5]  John L. Dettbarn,et al.  Cost Analysis of Inadequate Interoperability in the U.S. Capital Facilities Industry. , 2004 .

[6]  S. Timmermans,et al.  A World of Standards but not a Standard World: Toward a Sociology of Standards and Standardization* , 2010 .

[7]  C. Bloch,et al.  Oslo Manual - Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Innovation Data, 3rd edition: Proposed Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Innovation Data , 2005 .

[8]  J. Fagerberg,et al.  The Oxford handbook of innovation , 2006 .

[9]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  Interpreting Information Systems in Organizations , 1993 .

[10]  Paul Lillrank,et al.  The Quality of Standard, Routine and Nonroutine Processes , 2003 .

[11]  Vladislav V. Fomin Standards as Hybrids: An Essay on Tensions and Juxtapositions in Contemporary Standardization , 2012, Int. J. IT Stand. Stand. Res..

[12]  M. Klausner,et al.  Standardization and Innovation in Corporate Contracting (Or 'The Economics of Boilerplate') , 1997 .

[13]  Eija Kaasinen,et al.  Three User-Driven Innovation Methods for Co-creating Cloud Services , 2011, INTERACT.

[14]  Arto Kiviniemi,et al.  The IFC Standard - A Review of History, Development, and Standardization , 2012, J. Inf. Technol. Constr..

[15]  Kurt Sandholtz,et al.  Making Standards Stick: A Theory of Coupled vs. Decoupled Compliance , 2012 .

[16]  Jan Venselaar,et al.  DESIGN RULES , 1999 .

[17]  Frank T. Piller,et al.  Handbook of Research in Mass Customization and Personalization , 2009 .

[18]  Joseph Farrell,et al.  Standardization, Compatibility, and Innovation , 1985 .

[19]  Christian Koch,et al.  Projecting an Infrastructure - Shaping a community , 2013 .

[20]  Christian Koch,et al.  Innovation networking between stability and political dynamics , 2004 .

[21]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Design Rules: The Power of Modularity , 2000 .

[22]  A. Young Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences. , 2001 .