Fixed versus variable-parameter matrix models of forest growth: the case of maple-birch forests

Abstract A matrix growth model with constant parameters has been modified, by making survivor growth and mortality of trees functions of stand basal area. The functions, estimated from re-measured plots in Wisconsin maple-birch forests, showed that basal area affected mostly the growth of small trees. However, even when the effects were statistically significant, they were small. Fifteen-year forecasts with the variable-parameter model were almost identical to those of the fixed-parameter model for a set of 37 random plots. Long-term, steady-state predictions gave similar diameter distributions for both models, but a 20% lower basal area for the variable-parameter model. Steady-state management regimes that maximized soil rent were identical for both models in terms of intensity of harvest and length of cutting cycle. The basal area, harvests, and net present values predicted by both models, in the long run and during conversion, were also nearly the same. For managed maple-birch forests, the matrix model with constant parameters has the advantage of simplicity of form, estimation, and application, especially in optimization mode.

[1]  E. G. Lewis.  On the Generation and Growth of a Population , 1977 .

[2]  G. Likens,et al.  Pattern and process in a forested ecosystem. , 1979 .

[3]  M. Hansen,et al.  Data bases for forest inventory in the North-Central Region. , 1985 .

[4]  Joseph Buongiorno,et al.  A multi-species, density-dependent matrix growth model to predict tree diversity and income in northern hardwood stands , 1996 .

[5]  Allan J. Hruska,et al.  Predicting diameter distributions: a test of the stationary Markov model , 1986 .

[6]  Joseph Buongiorno,et al.  Tree Size Diversity and Economic Returns in Uneven-Aged Forest Stands , 1994 .

[7]  P. H. Leslie.  On the use of matrices in certain population mathematics. , 1945, Biometrika.

[8]  Guillermo A. Mendoza,et al.  A transition matrix forest growth model for evaluating alternative harvesting schemes in Indonesia , 1986 .

[9]  B. Michie,et al.  A matrix model of oak-hickory stand management and valuing forest land , 1986 .

[10]  Joseph Buongiorno,et al.  A matrix model of uneven-aged forest management. , 1980 .

[11]  W. G. Doubleday.  HARVESTING IN MATRIX POPULATION MODELS , 1975 .

[12]  J. Buongiorno,et al.  Volume and value growth of hardwood trees in Wisconsin. , 1993 .

[13]  M. B. Usher,et al.  A Matrix Model for Forest Management , 1969 .

[14]  F. Houllier,et al.  Growth and management of mixed-species, uneven-aged forests in the French Jura : implications for economic returns and tree diversity , 1995 .

[15]  S. E. Johnson,et al.  Evaluation of a stochastic diameter growth model for mountain ash , 1991 .

[16]  Terry P. Harrison,et al.  A generalized approach to the use of matrix growth models , 1985 .

[17]  M. B. Usher,et al.  A Matrix Approach to the Management of Renewable Resources, with Special Reference to Selection Forests-Two Extensions , 1969 .

[18]  J. Osho.  Matrix model for tree population projection in a tropical rain forest of south-western Nigeria , 1991 .

[19]  H. Bruner,et al.  A Markov Chain Approach to the Prediction of Diameter Distributions in Uneven-aged Forest Stands , 1973 .

[20]  M. Usher,et al.  A Matrix Approach to the Management of Renewable Resources, with Special Reference to Selection Forests , 1966 .