Reliability of a method for analyzing three-dimensional knee kinematics during gait.

BACKGROUND Different attachment systems have been proposed in an effort to reduce skin movement artifacts when recording knee bone movement during gait. One such system, called exoskeleton, has shown promising accuracy but little is known concerning its reliability. The objective of this study was to determine the intra- and inter-observer reliability of this attachment system for recording 3D knee kinematics during gait. METHODS Two separate studies were conducted. The intra-observer study involved one observer who reinstalled the exoskeleton on 15 healthy subjects and recorded gait kinematics four times for each subject. The inter-observer study also involved 15 healthy subjects and for each of these subjects, three observers reinstalled and recorded gait kinetics three times in randomized order. FINDINGS In the intra-observer setting, ICC values were 0.92, 0.94 and 0.88 for knee flexion/extension, abduction/adduction and internal/external tibial rotation, respectively. In the inter-observer setting, the corresponding values were 0.94, 0.92 and 0.89. INTERPRETATION The high ICC values found indicate very high reliability of the exoskeleton for recording 3D knee kinematics despite reinstallation. Moreover, the values between both settings are very similar which indicates that reliability is independent of the observer who performs the installation. Therefore, evaluations may be carried out by several different clinicians without impacting reliability.

[1]  Reed Ferber,et al.  Gait mechanics in chronic ACL deficiency and subsequent repair. , 2002, Clinical biomechanics.

[2]  David G Lloyd,et al.  Repeatability of gait data using a functional hip joint centre and a mean helical knee axis. , 2003, Journal of biomechanics.

[3]  F. J. Alonso,et al.  Application of singular spectrum analysis to the smoothing of raw kinematic signals. , 2005, Journal of biomechanics.

[4]  H. K. Ramakrishnan,et al.  Repeatability of kinematic, kinetic, and electromyographic data in normal adult gait , 1989, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[5]  A Leardini,et al.  Position and orientation in space of bones during movement: anatomical frame definition and determination. , 1995, Clinical biomechanics.

[6]  N. Hagemeister,et al.  A reproducible method for studying three-dimensional knee kinematics. , 2005, Journal of biomechanics.

[7]  A. J. van den Bogert,et al.  Effect of skin movement on the analysis of skeletal knee joint motion during running. , 1997, Journal of biomechanics.

[8]  E S Grood,et al.  A joint coordinate system for the clinical description of three-dimensional motions: application to the knee. , 1983, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[9]  M P Kadaba,et al.  Measurement of lower extremity kinematics during level walking , 1990, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[10]  R. Poveda,et al.  Quantitative assessment of gait deviation: contribution to the objective measurement of disability. , 2000 .

[11]  Yahia,et al.  Three-dimensional knee analyzer validation by simple fluoroscopic study. , 2000, The Knee.

[12]  Nicola Hagemeister,et al.  In vivo reproducibility of a new non-invasive diagnostic tool for three-dimensional knee evaluation , 1999 .

[13]  R. N. Stauffer,et al.  Normative data of knee joint motion and ground reaction forces in adult level walking. , 1983, Journal of biomechanics.

[14]  David G Lloyd,et al.  Repeatability of 3D gait kinematics obtained from an electromagnetic tracking system during treadmill locomotion. , 2007, Journal of biomechanics.

[15]  M. Sati,et al.  Improving in vivo knee kinematic measurements: application to prosthetic ligament analysis , 1996 .

[16]  K. An,et al.  Repeated measures of adult normal walking using a video tracking system 1 Presented in part at the 1 , 1997 .