A modified predictive control strategy of three-phase grid-connected converters with optimized action time sequence

Due to the excellent dynamic performance, the Finite Control Set Model Predictive Control has been widely used in various types of converters. However, when Finite Control Set Model Predictive Control is adopted, the switching frequency of converters varies significantly with system operating conditions. Consequently, constant-frequency predictive control strategy has been proposed. Two active voltage vectors and a zero voltage vector are selected within each sampling period. The action time sequence is then calculated. Due to the unsymmetrical distribution of current variation rates around zero, the calculated value of the voltage-vector action time will turn up negative. According to common sense, the voltage-vector action time is greater than or equal to zero. The action time is normally forced to zero whenever a negative value is predicted, resulting in the control failure and performance deterioration. To solve this problem, this paper proposes modified strategy. The modified strategy examines the action time calculated out. When negative action time comes out, the modified strategy reselects the active voltage vector accordingly, instead of forcing the action time to be zero. Optimized action time sequence is further determined by minimizing the cost function. The effectiveness of the modified strategy is clearly verified by experimental tests, and analytical remarks are all founded in practical results.

[1]  Marcelo A. Pérez,et al.  Predictive Control of AC–AC Modular Multilevel Converters , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[2]  D.E. Quevedo,et al.  Predictive Current Control Strategy With Imposed Load Current Spectrum , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics.

[3]  K. Sivakumar,et al.  Online Computation of Hysteresis Boundary for Constant Switching Frequency Current-Error Space-Vector-Based Hysteresis Controller for VSI-Fed IM Drives , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics.

[4]  Manfred Morari,et al.  Model Predictive Direct Torque Control—Part II: Implementation and Experimental Evaluation , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[5]  Manfred Morari,et al.  Model Predictive Direct Torque Control—Part I: Concept, Algorithm, and Analysis , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[6]  T. Geyer,et al.  Computationally efficient Model Predictive Direct Torque Control , 2010, 2010 IEEE Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition.

[7]  P. Cortes,et al.  Model Predictive Control of an AFE Rectifier With Dynamic References , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics.

[8]  P. Landsmann,et al.  Saliency-based sensorless predictive torque control with reduced torque ripple , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics.

[9]  U. Ammann,et al.  Model Predictive Control—A Simple and Powerful Method to Control Power Converters , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[10]  Ralph Kennel,et al.  High-Performance Control Strategies for Electrical Drives: An Experimental Assessment , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[11]  Zhanfeng Song,et al.  Assessing transient response of DFIG based wind turbines during voltage dips regarding main flux saturation and rotor deep-bar effect , 2010 .

[12]  Jiabing Hu,et al.  Investigation on Switching Patterns of Direct Power Control Strategies for Grid-Connected DC–AC Converters Based on Power Variation Rates , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics.

[13]  R. Kennel,et al.  An Improved FCS–MPC Algorithm for an Induction Motor With an Imposed Optimized Weighting Factor , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics.

[14]  Zhanfeng Song,et al.  Robust Model Predictive Current Control of Three-Phase Voltage Source PWM Rectifier With Online Disturbance Observation , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics.

[15]  Sergio L. Toral Marín,et al.  Predictive current control of dual three-phase drives using restrained search techniques and multi level voltage source inverters , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Symposium on Industrial Electronics.

[16]  Yasser Abdel-Rady I. Mohamed,et al.  Mitigation of Dynamic, Unbalanced, and Harmonic Voltage Disturbances Using Grid-Connected Inverters With $LCL$ Filter , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[17]  Sergio L. Toral Marín,et al.  An Enhanced Predictive Current Control Method for Asymmetrical Six-Phase Motor Drives , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[18]  David E. Culler,et al.  Reducing Transient and Steady State Electricity Consumption in HVAC Using Learning-Based Model-Predictive Control , 2012, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[19]  Cesar Silva,et al.  Delay Compensation in Model Predictive Current Control of a Three-Phase Inverter , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[20]  Andrzej M. Trzynadlowski,et al.  Robust Nonlinear Predictive Controller for Permanent-Magnet Synchronous Motors With an Optimized Cost Function , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[21]  Rae-Young Kim,et al.  Robust Predictive Current Controller Based on a Disturbance Estimator in a Three-Phase Grid-Connected Inverter , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics.

[22]  Pablo Lezana,et al.  Steady-state issues with finite control set model predictive control , 2009, 2009 35th Annual Conference of IEEE Industrial Electronics.