Methods of Exposure Assessment for Community-Based Studies: Aspects Inherent to the Validation of Questionnaires

Abstract Possible sources of inaccuracy in the data collecting stage and various methods to evaluate the quality of data are reviewed. Interviews of surrogates are often used in epidemiological studies, even if they are likely to introduce a higher level of inaccuracy than when subjects themselves are questioned. The preliminary results of a study on the accuracy of work history information obtained from the relatives of the subjects in a case-control study of lung cancer are presented. A mail questionnaire requested the same information from the surrogates as was asked of the original cases. Accuracy was measured for major occupational categories by evaluating sensitivity and specificity and calculating k statistic agreement. Some major occupational categories, which are well represented and traditional in the study area, showed a high specificity and sensitivity and a high k agreement. Various methods of exposure identification are reviewed. Job exposure matrices generated a priori or a posteriori were ...

[1]  L. Fratiglioni,et al.  The use of surrogate respondents to obtain questionnaire data in case-control studies of neurologic diseases. , 1986, Journal of chronic diseases.

[2]  D. Weiss,et al.  An objective validation of factual interview data , 1960 .

[3]  L. Rips,et al.  Answering autobiographical questions: the impact of memory and inference on surveys. , 1987, Science.

[4]  J. Samet,et al.  An assessment of the validity of questionnaire responses provided by a surviving spouse. , 1986, American journal of epidemiology.

[5]  C Brownie,et al.  The effects of exposure misclassification on estimates of relative risk. , 1986, American journal of epidemiology.

[6]  D. Silverman,et al.  An occupation and exposure linkage system for the study of occupational carcinogenesis. , 1980, Journal of occupational medicine. : official publication of the Industrial Medical Association.

[7]  D. Christiani,et al.  Accuracy of work history obtained from a spouse. , 1987, Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health.

[8]  D. Paterson,et al.  Validity of work histories obtained by interview. , 1950 .

[9]  L. Gordis,et al.  Assuring the quality of questionnaire data in epidemiologic research. , 1979, American Journal of Epidemiology.

[10]  H Checkoway,et al.  Bias due to misclassification in the estimation of relative risk. , 1977, American journal of epidemiology.

[11]  J Siemiatycki,et al.  Discovering carcinogens in the occupational environment: a novel epidemiologic approach. , 1981, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[12]  L. Pickle,et al.  Information available from surrogate respondents in case-control interview studies. , 1983, American journal of epidemiology.

[13]  D. Coggon,et al.  Accuracy of occupational histories obtained from wives. , 1985, British journal of industrial medicine.

[14]  O Axelson,et al.  A validation of questionnaire information on occupational exposure and smoking. , 1982, Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health.

[15]  G. Thériault,et al.  Validity of self reported work history. , 1988, British journal of industrial medicine.

[16]  D. Kriebel,et al.  A case control study of lung cancer in Florence, Italy. I. Occupational risk factors. , 1985, Journal of epidemiology and community health.

[17]  H. Toutenburg Fleiss, J. L.: Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions. John Wiley & Sons, New York‐London‐Sydney‐Toronto 1973. XIII, 233 S. , 1974 .

[18]  J. Siemiatycki,et al.  Validity of work histories obtained by interview for epidemiologic purposes. , 1983, American journal of epidemiology.