THE WATER BALANCE OF AN AGRICULTURAL CATCHMENT. I. ESTIMATION OF EVAPORATION FROM SOIL WATER RECORDS

Summary Errors of measurement of soil water content with the neutron probe can be made small enough for most water balance studies; and apart from the possible damage resulting from access tube implacement, they can be readily specified. A more important problem is estimating how much water is lost from soil by drainage. A simple, graphical method is described to distinguish between drainage and evaporation from soil, based upon identification of the maximum depth at which measurable quantities of water are extracted by roots. As a result of errors in soil water measurements and uncertainties in the distinction between drainage and evaporation, estimates of soil water deficit and hence evaporation for a single profile are likely to have a precision of about ±5 mm. Larger variability is commonly found in soil water storage changes measured in replicate profiles partly because of uneven wetting of the soil during rain and partly because of non-uniform losses by drainage and root extraction. This variability requires careful attention to replication and location of access tubes when assessing the evaporation for a particular site.

[1]  W. Stern Evapotranspiration of Safflower at three densities of sowing , 1965 .

[2]  W. Stern,et al.  The drainage component of the water balance equation , 1965 .

[3]  J. Holmes,et al.  Grassland hydrology in a karstic region of southern Australia. , 1970 .

[4]  W. H. Gardner,et al.  Unsaturated Flow of Water in Field Soils and Its Effect on Soil Moisture Investigations1 , 1954 .

[5]  J. P. Bell A NEW DESIGN PRINCIPLE FOR NEUTRON SOIL MOISTURE GAGES: THE “WALLINGFORD” NEUTRON PROBE , 1969 .

[6]  W. R. Gardner,et al.  The Prediction of Evaporation, Drainage, and Soil Water Storage for a Bare Soil , 1969 .

[7]  C. V. Bavel,et al.  Soil water measurement with an Am241-Be neutron source and an application to evaporimetry* , 1967 .

[8]  D. R. Nielsen,et al.  Field Measurement and Use of Soil‐Water Properties , 1969 .

[9]  W. Rouse EFFECTS OF SOIL WATER MOVEMENT ON ACTUAL EVAPOTRANSPIRATION ESTIMATED FROM THE SOIL MOISTURE BUDGET , 1970 .

[10]  K. King,et al.  DETERMINATION OF EVAPOTRANSPIRATION USING THE NEUTRON SCATTERING METHOD , 1965 .

[11]  R. Kitching Water use by tree plantations , 1967 .

[12]  C. V. Bavel,et al.  Hydraulic Properties of a Clay Loam Soil and the Field Measurement of Water Uptake by Roots: II. The Water Balance of the Root Zone1 , 1968 .

[13]  J. C. Wilcox RATE OF SOIL DRAINAGE FOLLOWING AN IRRIGATION.: II. EFFECTS ON DETERMINATION OF RATE OF CONSUMPTIVE USE , 1960 .

[14]  D. R. Nielsen,et al.  Water movement through Panoche clay loam soil , 1964 .

[15]  T. C. Olson,et al.  Water Loss from an Irrigated Sorghum Field: I. Water Flux within and below the Root Zone 1 , 1973 .

[16]  Peter J. Gregory,et al.  Water relations of winter wheat: 2. Soil water relations , 1978, The Journal of Agricultural Science.

[17]  P. Hebblethwaite,et al.  Irrigation and nitrogen studies in s. 23 ryegrass grown for seed , 1977, The Journal of Agricultural Science.