Duration Ratings as an Index of Processing Resources Required for Cognitive Tasks.

Six experiments provided tests of the effectiveness of subjective duration ratings as an index of the processing resources required in cognitive tasks. Duration ratings reflected significant differences between the resources needed to process high- and low-frequency words (Experiments 1, 5, and 6), and ambiguous and unambiguous words (Experiments 1 and 2), and produced an interaction between memory load and word frequency (Experiment 6). However, participants tended to assign higher ratings to larger stimuli (Experiments 1, 4, and 5); for example, words in upper case received higher ratings than words in lower case. Although physical size of stimuli is an important factor to consider, subjective duration estimates provide a useful measure for understanding cognitive processing. This conclusion is supported by the current replication of several findings in the cognitive literature, including the word-frequency and lexical-ambiguity effects.

[1]  J. B. Priestley,et al.  Man and Time , 1964 .

[2]  G Underwood,et al.  Selectivity of Attention and the Perception of Duration , 1973, Perception.

[3]  C. Herdman,et al.  Attentional demands of visual word recognition. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[4]  J. Stroop.  Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. , 1992 .

[5]  R. Ornstein,et al.  The experience of time , 1986 .

[6]  William C. Ogden,et al.  Letter encoding is an obligatory but capacity-demanding operation. , 1981 .

[7]  G Kellas,et al.  Lexical ambiguity and the timecourse of attentional allocation in word recognition. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[8]  S. W. Brown,et al.  Time perception and attention: The effects of prospective versus retrospective paradigms and task demands on perceived duration , 1985, Perception & psychophysics.

[9]  Daniel G Bobrow,et al.  On data-limited and resource-limited processes , 1975, Cognitive Psychology.

[10]  Ewart A. C. Thomas,et al.  Cognitive processing and time perception , 1975 .

[11]  James L. McClelland,et al.  A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. , 1989, Psychological review.

[12]  S. Jay Samuels,et al.  The effects of letter degradation and letter spacing on word recognition , 1976 .

[13]  H. Kucera,et al.  Computational analysis of present-day American English , 1967 .

[14]  G. Shulman.  Attentional Modulation of Size Contrast , 1992, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[15]  Greg B. Simpson,et al.  Lexical ambiguity and the timecourse of attentional allocation in word recognition. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[16]  J. Warm,et al.  Stimulus and Motivational Determinants in Temporal Perception , 1964 .

[17]  Geoffrey Underwood,et al.  Word shape, orthographic regularity, and contextual interactions in a reading task , 1982, Cognition.

[18]  P. Jolicoeur,et al.  Evidence against early selection: stimulus quality effects in previewed displays. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[19]  N. Cantor,et al.  Control of attention in the processing of temporal and spatial information in complex visual patterns. , 1977, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[20]  C. Gray,et al.  Duration Differences: Attentional Demand or Time Error? , 1982, Perception.

[21]  K R Paap,et al.  Word shape's in poor shape for the race to the lexicon. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[22]  Kenneth R. Paap,et al.  Word shape's in poor shape for the race to the lexicon. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[23]  K D Broota,et al.  Automatic and attentional components in perception of size-at-a-distance , 1986, Perception & psychophysics.

[24]  D. Balota,et al.  Are lexical decisions a good measure of lexical access? The role of word frequency in the neglected decision stage. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[25]  L. Hochhaus,et al.  Common Words are Longer in Apparent Duration than are Rare Words. , 1991, The Journal of general psychology.

[26]  R. Rousseau,et al.  Time estimation as an index of processing demand in memory search , 1987, Perception & psychophysics.

[27]  Herbert Rubenstein,et al.  Homographic entries in the internal lexicon: Effects of systematicity and relative frequency of meanings , 1971 .

[28]  L. Avant,et al.  On visual access to letter case and lexical/semantic information , 1985, Memory & cognition.

[29]  J. Warm,et al.  Influence of word frequency and length on the apparent duration of tachistoscopic presentations. , 1969, Journal of experimental psychology.

[30]  J. Jastrzembski.  Multiple meanings, number of related meanings, frequency of occurrence, and the lexicon , 1981, Cognitive Psychology.

[31]  M. Frankenhaeuser,et al.  Estimation of time , 1959 .

[32]  S. Hains,et al.  Individual differences in word recognition latency , 1979 .

[33]  John Theios,et al.  Theoretical analysis of the cognitive processing of lexical and pictorial stimuli: reading, naming, and visual and conceptual comparisons. , 1989 .

[34]  Ewart A. C. Thomas,et al.  Time perception and the filled-duration illusion , 1974 .

[35]  L. Avant,et al.  Stimulus familiarity modifies perceived duration in prerecognition visual processing. , 1975, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[36]  R. Rousseau,et al.  Time estimation and concurrent nontemporal processing: Specific interference from short-term-memory demands , 1993, Perception & psychophysics.

[37]  K. Forster,et al.  Terminating and exhaustive search in lexical access , 1976, Memory & cognition.

[38]  D. Zakay.  Time Estimation Methods—Do They Influence Prospective Duration Estimates? , 1993, Perception.

[39]  K. Paap,et al.  Dual-route models of print to sound: Still a good horse race , 1991 .

[40]  Michael J. Cosky,et al.  The role of letter recognition in word recognition , 1976, Memory & cognition.

[41]  C. A. Becker.  Allocation of attention during visual word recognition. , 1976, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[42]  F. Richard Ferraro,et al.  Normative data for number of word meanings , 1990 .

[43]  Geoffrey M. Underwood,et al.  Attention and the Perception of Duration during Encoding and Retrieval , 1975 .