Improving Myoelectric Control for Amputees through Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation

Most prosthetic myoelectric control studies have shown good performance for unimpaired subjects. However, performance is generally unacceptable for amputees. The primary problem is the poor quality of electromyography (EMG) signals of amputees compared with healthy individuals. To improve clinical performance of myoelectric control, this study explored transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) to modulate brain activity and enhance EMG quality. We tested six unilateral transradial amputees by applying active and sham anodal tDCS separately on two different days. Surface EMG signals were acquired from the affected and intact sides for 11 hand and wrist motions in the pre-tDCS and post-tDCS sessions. Autoregression coefficients and linear discriminant analysis classifiers were used to process the EMG data for pattern recognition of the 11 motions. For the affected side, active anodal tDCS significantly reduced the average classification error rate (CER) by 10.1%, while sham tDCS had no such effect. For the intact side, the average CER did not change on the day of sham tDCS but increased on the day of active tDCS. These results demonstrated that tDCS could modulate brain function and improve EMG-based classification performance for amputees. It has great potential in dramatically reducing the length of learning process of amputees for effectively using myoelectrically controlled multifunctional prostheses.

[1]  Kevin B. Englehart,et al.  A robust, real-time control scheme for multifunction myoelectric control , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[2]  R. H. Jebsen,et al.  An objective and standardized test of hand function. , 1969, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[3]  R. Friedlander,et al.  Transcranial focused ultrasound modulates the activity of primary somatosensory cortex in humans. , 2014, Neurosurgery.

[4]  W. Paulus Transcranial electrical stimulation (tES – tDCS; tRNS, tACS) methods , 2011, Neuropsychological rehabilitation.

[5]  B. Day,et al.  Interhemispheric inhibition of the human motor cortex. , 1992, The Journal of physiology.

[6]  Francesca Morgante,et al.  Effect of low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on interhemispheric inhibition. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[7]  Richard F. Weir,et al.  A Comparison of the Effects of Electrode Implantation and Targeting on Pattern Classification Accuracy for Prosthesis Control , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[8]  Kristin Østlie,et al.  Prosthesis rejection in acquired major upper-limb amputees: a population-based survey , 2012, Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology.

[9]  Dingguo Zhang,et al.  Can transcranial direct current stimulation enhance performance of myoelectric control for multifunctional prosthesis? , 2014, 2014 36th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[10]  Dario Farina,et al.  Myoelectric Control of Artificial Limbs¿Is There a Need to Change Focus? [In the Spotlight] , 2012, IEEE Signal Process. Mag..

[11]  J. Davidson A survey of the satisfaction of upper limb amputees with their prostheses, their lifestyles, and their abilities. , 2002, Journal of hand therapy : official journal of the American Society of Hand Therapists.

[12]  Walter Paulus,et al.  Facilitating myoelectric-control with transcranial direct current stimulation: a preliminary study in healthy humans , 2014, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[13]  Sergio P. Rigonatti,et al.  Transcranial direct current stimulation of the unaffected hemisphere in stroke patients , 2005, Neuroreport.

[14]  Adrian D. C. Chan,et al.  A Gaussian mixture model based classification scheme for myoelectric control of powered upper limb prostheses , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[15]  Sangeetha Madhavan,et al.  Enhancing Motor Skill Learning with Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation – A Concise Review with Applications to Stroke , 2012, Front. Psychiatry.

[16]  Damjan Zazula,et al.  Real-Time Motor Unit Identification From High-Density Surface EMG , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[17]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Pharmacological Modulation of Cortical Excitability Shifts Induced by Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Humans , 2003, The Journal of physiology.

[18]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Pharmacological approach to the mechanisms of transcranial DC-stimulation-induced after-effects of human motor cortex excitability. , 2002, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[19]  Dario Farina,et al.  Noninvasive, Accurate Assessment of the Behavior of Representative Populations of Motor Units in Targeted Reinnervated Muscles , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[20]  Nitish V. Thakor,et al.  User Training for Pattern Recognition-Based Myoelectric Prostheses: Improving Phantom Limb Movement Consistency and Distinguishability , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[21]  O. Stavdahl,et al.  Control of Upper Limb Prostheses: Terminology and Proportional Myoelectric Control—A Review , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[22]  K. Englehart,et al.  Classification of the myoelectric signal using time-frequency based representations. , 1999, Medical engineering & physics.

[23]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Excitability changes induced in the human motor cortex by weak transcranial direct current stimulation , 2000, The Journal of physiology.

[24]  R.N. Scott,et al.  A new strategy for multifunction myoelectric control , 1993, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[25]  L. Cohen,et al.  Transcranial direct current stimulation: State of the art 2008 , 2008, Brain Stimulation.

[26]  C. Herrmann,et al.  Transcranial alternating current stimulation: a review of the underlying mechanisms and modulation of cognitive processes , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[27]  Zhaojie Ju,et al.  Surface EMG Based Hand Manipulation Identification Via Nonlinear Feature Extraction and Classification , 2013, IEEE Sensors Journal.

[28]  A. Sirigu,et al.  Illusory movements of the paralyzed limb restore motor cortex activity , 2003, NeuroImage.

[29]  Sergio P. Rigonatti,et al.  Enhancement of non-dominant hand motor function by anodal transcranial direct current stimulation , 2006, Neuroscience Letters.

[30]  Todd A. Kuiken,et al.  Improving Myoelectric Pattern Recognition Robustness to Electrode Shift by Changing Interelectrode Distance and Electrode Configuration , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[31]  Hiroshi Yokoi,et al.  Adaptable EMG Prosthetic Hand using On-line Learning Method -Investigation of Mutual Adaptation between Human and Adaptable Machine , 2006, ROMAN 2006 - The 15th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[32]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Sustained excitability elevations induced by transcranial DC motor cortex stimulation in humans , 2001, Neurology.

[33]  Daniel Graupe,et al.  Functional Separation of EMG Signals via ARMA Identification Methods for Prosthesis Control Purposes , 1975, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[34]  Rajiv Ranganathan,et al.  Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Alters Elbow Flexor Muscle Recruitment Strategies , 2014, Brain Stimulation.

[35]  Nathan E. Bunderson,et al.  Quantification of Feature Space Changes With Experience During Electromyogram Pattern Recognition Control , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[36]  Xiangyang Zhu,et al.  Dynamical Characteristics of Surface EMG Signals of Hand Grasps via Recurrence Plot , 2014, IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics.

[37]  Dingguo Zhang,et al.  Application of a self-enhancing classification method to electromyography pattern recognition for multifunctional prosthesis control , 2013, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[38]  A. Willsky,et al.  Upper Extremity Limb Function Discrimination Using EMG Signal Analysis , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[39]  B. Nolan Boosting slow oscillations during sleep potentiates memory , 2008 .

[40]  K. Reilly,et al.  Persistent hand motor commands in the amputees' brain. , 2006, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[41]  T. Elbert,et al.  Phantom-limb pain as a perceptual correlate of cortical reorganization following arm amputation , 1995, Nature.

[42]  Todd A. Kuiken,et al.  The Effects of Electrode Size and Orientation on the Sensitivity of Myoelectric Pattern Recognition Systems to Electrode Shift , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[43]  H. Flor,et al.  Phantom movements and pain. An fMRI study in upper limb amputees. , 2001, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[44]  M. Hallett Transcranial magnetic stimulation and the human brain , 2000, Nature.

[45]  L. Cohen,et al.  Effects of non-invasive cortical stimulation on skilled motor function in chronic stroke. , 2005, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[46]  Gottfried Schlaug,et al.  Dual-hemisphere tDCS facilitates greater improvements for healthy subjects' non-dominant hand compared to uni-hemisphere stimulation , 2008, BMC Neuroscience.

[47]  S Laureys,et al.  [Transcranial direct current stimulation: a new tool for neurostimulation]. , 2013, Revue neurologique.

[48]  O. Gosseries,et al.  La stimulation transcrânienne à courant continu : un nouvel outil de neurostimulation , 2013 .

[49]  Dario Farina,et al.  The Extraction of Neural Information from the Surface EMG for the Control of Upper-Limb Prostheses: Emerging Avenues and Challenges , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.