Equity in Effort: The "Sucker Effect" in Co-Acting Groups

This research investigates the effects of negative social cues on worker quantitative task performance, internal work motivation, and job satisfaction. Negative social cues may create an effect similar to a class of social dilemma phenomena in small groups known as the "sucker effect." The sucker effect was originally identified as a particular form of social loafing and stems from the perceptions that others in the group are withholding, or intend to withhold, effort. Individuals who hold this perception then withhold effort themselves to avoid being played for a "sucker" Although most social loafing research has examined the sucker effect in situations where individuals performed additive or disjunctive tasks, this experimental research investigates the degree to which the sucker effect occurs among individuals working in co-acting groups. Two common managerial strategies, goal setting and punishment, are examinedfor their ability to reduce the sucker effect. The results show that the sucker effect does occur in co-acting groups and that both punishment and goal setting may be used to reduce it. Further, goal setting was a more effective strategy than punishment.

[1]  Henry L. Tosi A Theory of Goal Setting and Task Performance , 1991 .

[2]  D. Organ Organizational citizenship behavior: The good soldier syndrome. , 1988 .

[3]  S. Harkins,et al.  Social loafing and self-evaluation with a social standard. , 1987 .

[4]  M. Schnake Vicarious Punishment in a Work Setting: A Failure to Replicate , 1987 .

[5]  M. Schnake,et al.  The Social Information Processing Model of Task Design , 1987 .

[6]  Edward W. Miles,et al.  A New Perspective on Equity Theory: The Equity Sensitivity Construct , 1987 .

[7]  Robert P. Steel,et al.  A meta-analytic study of the effects of goal setting on task performance: 1966-1984 , 1987 .

[8]  S. Harkins Social Loafing and Social Facilitation , 1987 .

[9]  S. Harkins,et al.  Effects of personal involvement: Thought-provoking implications for social loafing. , 1986 .

[10]  M. Schnake,et al.  Vicarious punishment in a work setting , 1986 .

[11]  David A. Kravitz,et al.  Ringelmann rediscovered: the original article , 1986 .

[12]  S. Harkins,et al.  The Role of Evaluation in Eliminating Social Loafing , 1985 .

[13]  S. Harkins,et al.  Equity in effort: An explanation of the social loafing effect. , 1985 .

[14]  Christina E. Shalley,et al.  Effects of Goal Difficulty and Expected External Evaluation on Intrinsic Motivation: A Laboratory Study , 1985 .

[15]  Ken Eason BooksProgress in applied social psychology (Vol 2): G.M. Stephenson and J.H. Davis (eds) John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, pp 325 + xi, £32.95 , 1985 .

[16]  J. P. Near,et al.  Cognition vs affect in measures of job satisfaction. , 1985, International journal of psychology : Journal international de psychologie.

[17]  Robert Albanese,et al.  Rational Behavior in Groups: The Free-Riding Tendency , 1985 .

[18]  Edward L. Deci,et al.  Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior , 1975, Perspectives in Social Psychology.

[19]  Vandra L. Huber,et al.  Situational moderators of leader reward and punishment behaviors: fact or fiction? , 1984, Organizational behavior and human performance.

[20]  N. Kerr Motivation losses in small groups: a social dilemma analysis , 1983 .

[21]  Ricky W. Griffin,et al.  Objective and social sources of information in task redesign: A field experiment. , 1983 .

[22]  N. Kerr,et al.  Dispensability of member effort and group motivation losses: Free-rider effects , 1983 .

[23]  R. Ryan,et al.  Relation of reward contingency and interpersonal context to intrinsic motivation: A review and test using cognitive evaluation theory. , 1983 .

[24]  S. Harkins,et al.  Effects of task difficulty and task uniqueness on social loafing. , 1982 .

[25]  E. A. Locke,et al.  Goal setting and task performance: 1969–1980. , 1981 .

[26]  K. Williams,et al.  Identifiability as a deterrant to social loafing: Two cheering experiments. , 1981 .

[27]  K. Williams,et al.  Social loafing: Allocating effort or taking it easy? , 1980 .

[28]  John M. Ivancevich,et al.  Punishment in Organizations: A Review, Propositions, and Research Suggestions , 1980 .

[29]  J. B. Shaw,et al.  Social influences on judgments about tasks , 1979 .

[30]  J. Cook,et al.  Scales for the measurement of some work attitudes and aspects of psychological well‐being , 1979 .

[31]  T. Mitchell,et al.  Job Enrichment Versus Social Cues: A Comparison and Competitive Test , 1979 .

[32]  K. Williams,et al.  Many Hands Make Light the Work: The Causes and Consequences of Social Loafing , 1979 .

[33]  John E. Dittrich,et al.  Equity Theory: The Recent Literature, Methodological Considerations, and New Directions , 1978 .

[34]  J. Pfeffer,et al.  An examination of need-satisfaction models of job attitudes. , 1977 .

[35]  J. Terborg The Motivational Components of Goal Setting. , 1976 .

[36]  H. Dudley Dewhirst,et al.  Goal-setting attributes, personality variables, and job satisfaction , 1976 .

[37]  Richard M. Steers,et al.  Factors Affecting Job Attitudes in a Goal-Setting Environment , 1976 .

[38]  G. Latham,et al.  A Review of Research on the Application of Goal Setting in Organizations , 1975 .

[39]  J. Hackman,et al.  Development of the Job Diagnostic Survey , 1975 .

[40]  A. Ingham,et al.  The Ringelmann effect: Studies of group size and group performance , 1974 .

[41]  E. Deci INTRINSIC MOTIVATION, EXTRINSIC REINFORCEMENT, AND INEQUITY , 1972 .

[42]  Paul S. Goodman,et al.  An Examination of Adams' Theory of Inequity , 1971 .

[43]  Robert D. Pritchard,et al.  Equity theory: A review and critique. , 1969 .

[44]  Adams Js Towards an understanding of inequity , 1963 .

[45]  O. J. Dunn Multiple Comparisons among Means , 1961 .

[46]  M. Deutsch,et al.  A study of normative and informational social influences upon individual judgement. , 1955, Journal of abnormal psychology.