Can agent-based models assist decisions on large-scale practical problems? A philosophical analysis

The use of predictive agent-based models as decision assisting tools in practical problems has been proposed. This article aims at a theoretical clarification of the conditions for such use under what has been called post-normal problems, characterized by high stakes, high and possibly irreducible uncertainties, and high systemic complexity. Our argument suggests that model validation is often impossible under post-normal conditions; however, predictive models can still be useful as learning devices (heristic purposes, formal Gedanken experiments). In this case, micro-structurally complex models are to be preferred to micro-structurally simple ones; this is illustrated by means of two examples.

[1]  Josie Arnold,et al.  The virtual laboratory , 1996 .

[2]  P. Feyerabend Against Method: Outline of an Anarchistic Theory of Knowledge , 1976 .

[3]  K. Popper,et al.  The Logic of Scientific Discovery , 1960 .

[4]  S. Toulmin,et al.  Philosophy of Science , 1970, The British Journal for the History of Science.

[5]  R. Solé,et al.  Self-similarity of extinction statistics in the fossil record , 1997, Nature.

[6]  P. Bak,et al.  Self-organized criticality. , 1988, Physical review. A, General physics.

[7]  T. Kuhn,et al.  The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. , 1964 .

[8]  J. Ravetz,et al.  Complexity: Fad or future? , 1994 .

[9]  S. Funtowicz,et al.  Science for the Post-Normal Age , 1993, Commonplace.

[10]  P. Young,et al.  Simplicity out of complexity in environmental modelling: Occam's razor revisited. , 1996 .

[11]  Jerome R. Ravetz,et al.  Uncertainty and Quality in Science for Policy , 1990 .

[12]  M. Boden The Philosophy of Artificial Life , 1996 .

[13]  Jerome R. Ravetz,et al.  Uncertainty, complexity and post-normal science , 1994 .

[14]  Tang,et al.  Self-Organized Criticality: An Explanation of 1/f Noise , 2011 .

[15]  Bak,et al.  Punctuated equilibrium and criticality in a simple model of evolution. , 1993, Physical review letters.

[16]  A. Pickering The mangle of practice : time, agency, and science , 1997 .

[17]  Przemyslaw Prusinkiewicz,et al.  The Algorithmic Beauty of Plants , 1990, The Virtual Laboratory.

[18]  Svante Wold,et al.  Multivariate quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSAR): conditions for their applicability , 1983, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..

[19]  R. Harré The philosophies of science , 1985 .

[20]  Ernest Nagel,et al.  The Structure of Science , 1962 .

[21]  Per Bak,et al.  How Nature Works , 1996 .

[22]  Ronald N. Giere,et al.  Understanding Scientific Reasoning , 1979 .

[23]  J. Casti,et al.  Would-Be Worlds , 1996 .

[24]  Gordon MacKerron Ecological economics: energy, environment and society , 1988 .

[25]  E. Nagel The structure of science : problems in the logic of scientific explanation , 1961 .

[26]  E. Bonabeau,et al.  Self-organization in social insects. , 1997, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[27]  C. Hempel Philosophy of Natural Science , 1966 .