A Comparative Study of Uncertainty Propagation Methods for Black-Box Type Functions

It is an important step in deign under uncertainty to select an appropriate uncertainty propagation (UP) method considering the characteristics of the engineering systems at hand, the required level of UP associated with the probabilistic design scenario, and the required accuracy and efficiency levels. Many uncertainty propagation methods have been developed in various fields, however, there is a lack of good understanding of their relative merits. In this paper, a comparative study on the performances of several UP methods, including a few recent methods that have received growing attention, is performed. The full factorial numerical integration (FFNI), the univariate dimension reduction method (UDR), and the polynomial chaos expansion (PCE) are implemented and applied to several test problems with different settings of the performance nonlinearity, distribution types of input random variables, and the magnitude of input uncertainty. The performances of those methods are compared in moment estimation, tail probability calculation, and the probability density function (PDF) construction. It is found that the FFNI with the moment matching quadrature rule shows good accuracy but the computational cost becomes prohibitive as the number of input random variables increases. The accuracy and efficiency of the UDR method for moment estimations appear to be superior when there is no significant interaction effect in the performance function. Both FFNI and UDR are very robust against the non-normality of input variables. The PCE is implemented in combination with FFNI for coefficients estimation. The PCE method is shown to be a useful approach when a complete PDF description is desired. Inverse Rosenblatt transformation is used to treat non-normal inputs of PCE, however, it is shown that the transformation may result in the degradation of accuracy of PCE. It is also shown that in black-box type of system the performance and convergence of PCE highly depend on the method adopted to estimate its coefficients.© 2007 ASME

[1]  Tae Won Lee,et al.  A Reliability-Based Optimal Design Using Advanced First Order Second Moment Method , 1987 .

[2]  D. Xiu.  Efficient collocational approach for parametric uncertainty analysis , 2007 .

[3]  Genichi Taguchi,et al.  Performance analysis design , 1978 .

[4]  Ramana V. Grandhi,et al.  Structural reliability under non-Gaussian stochastic behavior , 2004 .

[5]  Byung Man Kwak,et al.  Efficient statistical tolerance analysis for general distributions using three-point information , 2002 .

[6]  Saad T. Bakir,et al.  Tolerance Design: A Handbook for Developing Optimal Specifications , 1996 .

[7]  Timothy W. Simpson,et al.  Multidisciplinary Robust Design Optimization of an Internal Combustion Engine , 2003 .

[8]  R. Ghanem,et al.  Stochastic Finite Elements: A Spectral Approach , 1990 .

[9]  John R. D'Errico,et al.  Statistical tolerancing using a modification of Taguchi's method , 1988 .

[10]  Y.-T. Wu,et al.  COMPUTATIONAL METHODS FOR EFFICIENT STRUCTURAL RELIABILITY AND RELIABILITY SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS , 1993 .

[11]  George A. Hazelrigg,et al.  A Framework for Decision-Based Engineering Design , 1998 .

[12]  R. Melchers.  Importance sampling in structural systems , 1989 .

[13]  Byung Man Kwak,et al.  Response surface augmented moment method for efficient reliability analysis , 2006 .

[14]  S. Rahman,et al.  A univariate dimension-reduction method for multi-dimensional integration in stochastic mechanics , 2004 .

[15]  Hid N. Grouni,et al.  Methods of structural safety , 1986 .

[16]  N. L. Johnson,et al.  Continuous Univariate Distributions. , 1995 .

[17]  Panos Y. Papalambros,et al.  Design Optimization of Hierarchically Decomposed Multilevel Systems Under Uncertainty , 2006 .

[18]  Palle Thoft-Christensen,et al.  Structural Reliability Theory and Its Applications , 1982 .

[19]  David H. Evans.  An Application of Numerical Integration Techniques to Statistical Tolerancing, III—General Distributions , 1972 .

[20]  A. M. Hasofer,et al.  Exact and Invariant Second-Moment Code Format , 1974 .

[21]  N. Cox.  Statistical Models in Engineering , 1970 .

[22]  A. Der Kiureghian,et al.  Structural reliability methods for seismic safety assessment: a review , 1996 .

[23]  Wei Chen,et al.  Towards a Better Understanding of Modeling Feasibility Robustness in Engineering Design , 2000 .

[24]  R. Rackwitz,et al.  Structural reliability under combined random load sequences , 1978 .

[25]  D. Xiu,et al.  Modeling uncertainty in flow simulations via generalized polynomial chaos , 2003 .

[26]  M. Kokkolaras,et al.  Probabilistic Analytical Target Cascading: A Moment Matching Formulation for Multilevel Optimization Under Uncertainty , 2006, DAC 2005.

[27]  Sharif Rahman,et al.  A generalized dimension‐reduction method for multi‐dimensional integration in stochastic mechanics (Int. J. Numer. Meth. Engng 2004; 61:1992–2019) , 2006 .

[28]  C. Bucher.  Adaptive sampling — an iterative fast Monte Carlo procedure , 1988 .

[29]  Wing Kam Liu,et al.  Random field finite elements , 1986 .

[30]  Kyung K. Choi,et al.  Hybrid Analysis Method for Reliability-Based Design Optimization , 2003 .

[31]  Menner A Tatang,et al.  Direct incorporation of uncertainty in chemical and environmental engineering systems , 1995 .

[32]  R. Rackwitz,et al.  Quadratic Limit States in Structural Reliability , 1979 .