Regulation of the fibroblast cell cycle by serum

WHEN “normal” fibroblasts are deprived of serum they cease growing and accumulate in the G1 or G0 stage of the cell cycle1. On restoration of serum, the cells begin to enter S phase quasi-synchronously after a well defined lag period which seems to be characteristic of the cell type. Following the studies of Todaro et al.2, Bürk3, and Temin4, it is widely believed that exposure to serum for only a portion of this lag period is sufficient to commit the cells irreversibly to initiate a round of DNA replication. Thus, removal of the serum after only a few hours, and before the end of the lag period, does not affect subsequent DNA synthesis in a significant proportion of the population. It has been apparent, nevertheless, that the proportion of such “committed” cells depends on the duration of the serum pulse2–5. Indeed, the relationship between the length of exposure to serum and the proportion of committed cells is approximately linear with time and (with 3T3 cells) extends beyond the end of the lag phase itself (Fig. 1). Clearly, some cells which are stimulated to initiate DNA synthesis during continuous exposure to serum are not committed by the end of the lag period, since removal of the serum at this point reduced the proportion of labelled cells, at 24 h, from 76 to 53% (Fig. 1b).

[1]  H Green,et al.  The initiation of cell division in a contact-inhibited mammalian cell line. , 1965, Journal of cellular physiology.

[2]  H. Temin,et al.  Stimulation by serum of multiplication of stationary chicken cells , 1971, Journal of cellular physiology.

[3]  H. Green,et al.  QUANTITATIVE STUDIES OF THE GROWTH OF MOUSE EMBRYO CELLS IN CULTURE AND THEIR DEVELOPMENT INTO ESTABLISHED LINES , 1963, The Journal of cell biology.

[4]  R. W. Holley,et al.  "Contact inhibition" of cell division in 3T3 cells. , 1968, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  G. Clarke,et al.  The response of normal and polyoma virus‐transformed BHK/21 cells to exogenous purines , 1973, Journal of cellular physiology.

[6]  E. Rozengurt,et al.  Enhancement by purine nucleosides and nucleotides of serum‐induced DNA synthesis in quiescent 3T3 cells , 1973, Journal of cellular physiology.

[7]  R. R. Bürk One-step growth cycle for BHK21-13 hamster fibroblasts. , 1970, Experimental cell research.

[8]  H. Rubin,et al.  Reversible alterations in the mitotic cycle of chick embryo cells in various states of growth regulation , 1975, Journal of cellular physiology.

[9]  R. Brooks The kinetics of serum‐induced initiation of DNA synthesis in BHK 21/C13 cells, and the influence of exogenous adenosine , 1975, Journal of cellular physiology.

[10]  G. Todaro,et al.  Stimulation of cell growth in vitro by serum with and without growth factor. Relation to contact inhibition and viral transformation. , 1970, Experimental cell research.

[11]  J. Smith,et al.  Do cells cycle? , 1973, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  R. Dulbecco,et al.  VIRUS-CELL INTERACTION WITH A TUMOR-PRODUCING VIRUS. , 1960, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  G. Edelman,et al.  THE KINETICS OF CELLULAR COMMITMENT DURING STIMULATION OF LYMPHOCYTES BY LECTINS , 1974, The Journal of cell biology.