Financial, Economic, and Environmental Analyses of Upgrading Reverse Osmosis Plant Fed with Treated Wastewater

One of the most effective strategies to mitigate water shortages worldwide is to reuse treated wastewater for freshwater production employing reverse osmosis (RO) technology. This strategy is appropriate in urban areas of arid or semi-arid regions as it can provide a sustainable and reliable water source close to the consumers. One of the drawbacks of RO is the high variability of production costs due to the electricity intensity. In addition, depending on the electricity source, it can also result in substantial environmental costs. This study showed that upgrading pumping and RO membrane systems of a wastewater reuse plant in Cyprus can significantly alleviate these drawbacks in terms cost, water recovery rate, and air pollution. The water-recovery rate of the upgraded RO plant increased from 43.2 to 75 percent, which resulted in a substantial net financial benefit due to the reduction in the quantity of wastewater purchased and the increase in potable water produced. The upgraded system also reduced the electricity requirement from 3.63 kWh/m3 to 1.92 kWh/m3. Pollution emissions decreased substantially because of the reduction in electricity requirements. The beneficiaries of these lower emission costs are the residents of Cyprus and global society. Overall, the benefit of upgrading the plant is highly attractive with more than 65 percent annual real internal rates of return in financial and economic terms. Positive net present values are realized for all the scenarios considered.

[1]  M. Qasim,et al.  Insights on the development of enhanced antifouling reverse osmosis membranes: Industrial applications and challenges , 2023, Desalination.

[2]  G. Jenkins,et al.  Wastewater Reuse to Mitigate the Risk of Water Shortages: An Integrated Investment Appraisal , 2022, Water.

[3]  J. Lora-García,et al.  A Comparative Analysis of Statistical Models and Mathematics in Reverse Osmosis Evaluation Processes as a Search Path to Achieve Better Efficiency , 2022, Water.

[4]  Weikun Li,et al.  Development and Industrial-Scale Fabrication of Next-Generation Low-Energy Membranes for Desalination , 2022, Membranes.

[5]  M. Simonič Reverse Osmosis Treatment of Wastewater for Reuse as Process Water—A Case Study , 2021, Membranes.

[6]  Sami G. Al‐Ghamdi,et al.  Assessing the Impact of Water Efficiency Policies on Qatar’s Electricity and Water Sectors , 2021, Energies.

[7]  Bo Zhang,et al.  Design and Energy Consumption Analysis of Small Reverse Osmosis Seawater Desalination Equipment , 2021, Energies.

[8]  M. Mauter,et al.  Cost and energy intensity of U.S. potable water reuse systems , 2021 .

[9]  Yu Zhang,et al.  Emerging thin-film nanocomposite (TFN) membranes for reverse osmosis: A review. , 2020, Water research.

[10]  D. Yang,et al.  A comprehensive review of energy consumption of seawater reverse osmosis desalination plants , 2019, Applied Energy.

[11]  N. Hilal,et al.  Reverse osmosis pretreatment technologies and future trends: A comprehensive review , 2019, Desalination.

[12]  Yang Wang,et al.  Sensitivity analysis and gradient-based optimisation of feed spacer shape in reverse osmosis membrane processes using discrete adjoint approach , 2019, Desalination.

[13]  S. Heijman,et al.  Optimal design of spacers in reverse osmosis , 2018 .

[14]  Daniel Beryl Gingerich,et al.  Air Emission Reduction Benefits of Biogas Electricity Generation at Municipal Wastewater Treatment Plants. , 2017, Environmental science & technology.

[15]  S. Blair,et al.  Bi-communal reuse of treated effluent in Cyprus , 2012 .

[16]  G. Jenkins Evaluation of Stakeholder Impacts in Cost-Benefit Analysis , 1999 .

[17]  A. Dahiru,et al.  Water resources management and trend of water use in North Cyprus , 2020 .