Infarct size and left ventricular function in the PRoximal Embolic Protection in Acute myocardial infarction and Resolution of ST-segment Elevation (PREPARE) trial: ancillary cardiovascular magnetic resonance study

Objectives The aim of the study was to evaluate whether primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with combined proximal embolic protection and thrombus aspiration results in smaller final infarct size and improved left ventricular function assessed by cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients compared with primary PCI alone. Background Primary PCI with the Proxis system improves immediate microvascular flow post-procedure as measured by ST-segment resolution, which could result in better outcomes. Methods The ancillary CMR study included 206 STEMI patients who were enrolled in the PRoximal Embolic Protection in Acute myocardial infarction and Resolution of ST-Elevation (PREPARE) trial. CMR imaging was assessed between 4 and 6 months after the index procedure. Results There were no significant differences in final infarct size (6.1 g/m2 vs 6.3 g/m2, p = 0.78) and left ventricular ejection fraction (50% vs 50%, p = 0.46) between both groups. Also, systolic wall thickening in the infarct area (44% vs 45%, p = 0.93) or the extent of transmural segments (8.3% of segments vs 8.3% of segments, p = 0.60) showed no significant differences. The incidence of major adverse cardiac and cerebral events at 6 months was similar in the Proxis and control group (8% vs 10%, respectively, p = 0.43). Conclusions Primary PCI with combined proximal embolic protection and thrombus aspiration in STEMI patients did not result in significant differences in final infarct size or left ventricular function at follow-up CMR. In addition, there was no difference in the incidence of major adverse cardiac and cerebral events at 6 months. Trial registration number ISRCTN71104460.

[1]  J. Tijssen,et al.  Randomized comparison of primary percutaneous coronary intervention with combined proximal embolic protection and thrombus aspiration versus primary percutaneous coronary intervention alone in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: the PREPARE (PRoximal Embolic Protection in Acute myocardial in , 2009, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[2]  F. Fedele,et al.  Thrombus aspiration during primary percutaneous coronary intervention improves myocardial reperfusion and reduces infarct size: the EXPIRA (thrombectomy with export catheter in infarct-related artery during primary percutaneous coronary intervention) prospective, randomized trial. , 2009, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[3]  J. Tijssen,et al.  Relation between the assessment of microvascular injury by cardiovascular magnetic resonance and coronary Doppler flow velocity measurements in patients with acute anterior wall myocardial infarction. , 2008, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[4]  F. Zijlstra,et al.  Cardiac death and reinfarction after 1 year in the Thrombus Aspiration during Percutaneous coronary intervention in Acute myocardial infarction Study (TAPAS): a 1-year follow-up study , 2008, The Lancet.

[5]  G. Finet,et al.  Long-Term Benefit of Postconditioning , 2008, Circulation.

[6]  A. J. O’Malley,et al.  Saphenous Vein Graft Stenting and Major Adverse Cardiac Events: A Predictive Model Derived From a Pooled Analysis of 3958 Patients , 2008, Circulation.

[7]  R. Kim,et al.  Performance of Delayed-Enhancement Magnetic Resonance Imaging With Gadoversetamide Contrast for the Detection and Assessment of Myocardial Infarction: An International, Multicenter, Double-Blinded, Randomized Trial , 2008, Circulation.

[8]  C. Rogers,et al.  The PROXIMAL trial: proximal protection during saphenous vein graft intervention using the Proxis Embolic Protection System: a randomized, prospective, multicenter clinical trial. , 2007, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[9]  B. Gersh,et al.  Microcirculatory dysfunction in ST-elevation myocardial infarction: cause, consequence, or both? , 2007, European heart journal.

[10]  Hiroshi Ito No-reflow phenomenon and prognosis in patients with acute myocardial infarction , 2006, Nature Clinical Practice Cardiovascular Medicine.

[11]  C. Terkelsen,et al.  Routine Thrombectomy in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Acute ST-Segment–Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Randomized, Controlled Trial , 2006, Circulation.

[12]  H. Johnsen,et al.  Stem Cell Mobilization Induced by Subcutaneous Granulocyte-Colony Stimulating Factor to Improve Cardiac Regeneration After Acute ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Result of the Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Stem Cells in Myocardial Infarction (STEMMI) Trial , 2006, Circulation.

[13]  R. Gibbons,et al.  Distal microcirculatory protection during percutaneous coronary intervention in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a randomized controlled trial. , 2005, JAMA.

[14]  O. Simonetti,et al.  Relationship of MRI delayed contrast enhancement to irreversible injury, infarct age, and contractile function. , 1999, Circulation.

[15]  C. Terkelsen,et al.  ST changes before and during primary percutaneous coronary intervention predict final infarct size in patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction. , 2009, Journal of electrocardiology.

[16]  J. Tijssen,et al.  Proximal embolic protection with aspiration in percutaneous coronary intervention using the Proxis device. , 2007, Reviews in cardiovascular medicine.