Quantum Mechanics as a Theory of Probability

We develop and defend the thesis that the Hilbert space formalism of quantum mechanics is a new theory of probability. The theory, like its classical counterpart, consists of an algebra of events, and the probability measures defined on it. The construction proceeds in the following steps: (a) Axioms for the algebra of events are introduced following Birkhoff and von Neumann. All axioms, except the one that expresses the uncertainty principle, are shared with the classical event space. The only models for the set of axioms are lattices of subspaces of inner product spaces over a field K. (b) Another axiom due to Soler forces K to be the field of real, or complex numbers, or the quaternions. We suggest a probabilistic reading of Soler's axiom. (c) Gleason's theorem fully characterizes the probability measures on the algebra of events, so that Born's rule is derived. (d) Gleason's theorem is equivalent to the existence of a certain finite set of rays, with a particular orthogonality graph (Wondergraph). Consequently, all aspects of quantum probability can be derived from rational probability assignments to finite "quantum gambles". (e) All experimental aspects of entanglement- the violation of Bell's inequality in particular- are explained as natural outcomes of the probabilistic structure. (f) We hypothesize that even in the absence of decoherence macroscopic entanglement can very rarely be observed, and provide a precise conjecture to that effect .We also discuss the relation of the present approach to quantum logic, realism and truth, and the measurement problem.

[1]  Weber,et al.  Unified dynamics for microscopic and macroscopic systems. , 1986, Physical review. D, Particles and fields.

[2]  Stanley Gudder,et al.  Quantum probability—Quantum logic (Lecture notes in physics 321). By Itamar Pitowsky , 1989 .

[3]  Ehud Hrushovski,et al.  Generalizations of Kochen and Specker's theorem and the effectiveness of Gleason's theorem , 2003 .

[4]  R. Feynman,et al.  Quantum Mechanics and Path Integrals , 1965 .

[5]  David Wallace Everettian Rationality: defending Deutsch's approach to probability in the Everett interpretation , 2003 .

[6]  A. Shimony,et al.  Proposed Experiment to Test Local Hidden Variable Theories. , 1969 .

[7]  A. Gleason Measures on the Closed Subspaces of a Hilbert Space , 1957 .

[8]  I. Pitowsky Infinite and finite Gleason’s theorems and the logic of indeterminacy , 1998 .

[9]  M. Wolf,et al.  All-multipartite Bell-correlation inequalities for two dichotomic observables per site , 2001, quant-ph/0102024.

[10]  K. Svozil,et al.  Optimal tests of quantum nonlocality , 2000, quant-ph/0011060.

[11]  I. Pitowsky Quantum Probability ― Quantum Logic , 1989 .

[12]  George Boole The laws of thought (1854) , 1916 .

[13]  J. Neumann,et al.  The Logic of Quantum Mechanics , 1936 .

[14]  U. Uhlhorn REPRESENTATION OF SYMMETRY TRANSFORMATIONS IN QUANTUM MECHANICS , 1963 .

[15]  Itamar Pitowsky,et al.  Betting on the Outcomes of Measurements:A Bayesian Theory of Quantum Probability , 2003 .

[16]  Unified Field Theory and the Conventionality of Geometry , 1984, Philosophy of Science.

[17]  R. Wagoner,et al.  Gravitation and Cosmology: Principles and Applications of the General Theory of Relativity , 1973 .

[18]  K. Gödel Philosophy of mathematics: What is Cantor's continuum problem? , 1984 .

[19]  R. Schack,et al.  Quantum probability from decision theory? , 1999, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[20]  E. Specker,et al.  The Problem of Hidden Variables in Quantum Mechanics , 1967 .

[21]  William Demopoulos Elementary propositions and essentially incomplete knowledge: A framework for the interpretation of quantum mechanics , 2004 .

[22]  Kiel T. Williams,et al.  Extreme quantum entanglement in a superposition of macroscopically distinct states. , 1990, Physical review letters.

[23]  A. Fine Hidden Variables, Joint Probability, and the Bell Inequalities , 1982 .

[24]  I. Pitowsky,et al.  Betting on the Outcomes of Measurements: A Bayesian Theory of Quantum Probability , 2002, quant-ph/0208121.

[25]  R. Solovay A model of set-theory in which every set of reals is Lebesgue measurable* , 1970 .

[26]  I. Pitowsky,et al.  George Boole's ‘Conditions of Possible Experience’ and the Quantum Puzzle , 1994, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.

[27]  S. Holland,et al.  Orthomodularity in infinite dimensions; a theorem of M. Solèr , 1995 .

[28]  M. Żukowski,et al.  Bell's theorem for general N-qubit states. , 2001, Physical review letters.

[29]  M. P. Soler,et al.  Characterization of hilbert spaces by orthomodular spaces , 1995 .

[30]  The Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics , 1974 .

[31]  H. Dishkant,et al.  Logic of Quantum Mechanics , 1976 .

[32]  Henry P. Stapp,et al.  The Undivided Universe: An ontological interpretation of Quantum Theory , 1994 .

[33]  A. Zeilinger,et al.  Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics , 1989 .

[34]  David Deutsch Quantum theory of probability and decisions , 1999, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[35]  Macroscopic objects in quantum mechanics: A combinatorial approach , 2004, quant-ph/0404051.

[36]  Vlatko Vedral,et al.  Macroscopic Thermodynamical Witnesses of Quantum Entanglement , 2004 .

[37]  Richard Phillips Feynman,et al.  The Concept of Probability in Quantum Mechanics , 1951 .

[38]  D. Finkelstein SECTION OF PHYSICAL SCIENCES: THE LOGIC OF QUANTUM PHYSICS* , 1963 .

[39]  G. Boole XV. On the Theory of probabilities , Proceedings of the Royal Society of London.

[40]  Jeffrey Bub Quantum Mechanics is About Quantum Information , 2005 .

[41]  Hans Primas,et al.  Realism and quantum mechanics , 1994 .