Potential applications of randomised graph sampling to invasive species surveillance and monitoring.

Many invasive plants and animals disperse preferentially through linear networks in the landscape, including road networks, riparian corridors, and power transmission lines. Unless the network of interest is small, or the budget for surveillance is large, it may be necessary to draw inferences from a sample rather than a complete census on the network. Desired features of a surveillance system to detect and quantify invasion include: (1) the ability to make unbiased statements about the spatial extent of invasion, the abundance of the invading organism, and the degree of impact; (2) the ability to quantify the uncertainty associated with those statements; (3) the ability to sample by moving within the network in a reasonable fashion, and with little wasted non-measurement time; and (4) the ability to incorporate auxiliary information (such as remotely sensed data, ecological models, or expert opinion) to direct sampling where it will be most fruitful. Randomised graph sampling (RGS) has all of these attributes. The network of interest (such as a road network) is recomposed into a graph, consisting of vertices (such as road intersections) and edges (such as road segments connecting nodes). The vertices and edges are used to construct paths representing reasonable sampling routes through the network; these paths are then sampled, potentially with unequal probability. Randomised graph sampling is unbiased, and the incorporation of auxiliary information can dramatically reduce sample variances. We illustrate RGS using simplified examples, and a survey of Polygonum cuspidatum (Siebold & Zucc.) within a high-priority conservation region in southern Maine, USA.

[1]  R. Kesseli,et al.  Sexual reproduction in the invasive species Fallopia japonica (Polygonaceae). , 2003, American journal of botany.

[2]  Frank H. Koch,et al.  Invasive forest pest surveillance: survey development and reliability , 2008 .

[3]  FRANK W. DAVIS,et al.  Science Priorities for Reducing the Threat of Invasive Species to Sustainable Forestry , 2005 .

[4]  Keith R Hayes,et al.  Biological invasions: recommendations for U.S. policy and management. , 2006, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[5]  J. Oliver Mile-a-minute Weed, (Polygonum perfoliatum L.), an Invasive Vine in Natural and Disturbed Sites , 1996 .

[6]  P. Pyšek,et al.  The invasive nature of Fallopia japonica is enhanced by vegetative regeneration from stem tissues. , 1995 .

[7]  M. Kendall Statistical Methods for Research Workers , 1937, Nature.

[8]  A. Clevenger,et al.  The influence of disturbance and habitat on the presence of non-native plant species along transport corridors. , 2005 .

[9]  W. Bitterlich,et al.  Die Winkelzählprobe , 1952, Forstwissenschaftliches Centralblatt.

[10]  S. Stehman,et al.  A practical sampling strategy for estimating residual stand damage , 1997 .

[11]  A. DiTommaso,et al.  A Review of the Biology and Ecology of Three Invasive Perennials in New York State: Japanese Knotweed (Polygonum cuspidatum), Mugwort (Artemisia vulgaris) and Pale Swallow-wort (Vincetoxicum rossicum) , 2005, Plant and Soil.

[12]  L. A. Seiger,et al.  Mechanical control of Japanese knotweed (Fallopia japonica [Houtt.] Ronse Decraene): effects of cutting regime on rhizomatous reserves. , 1997 .

[13]  T. Gregoire,et al.  Sampling Strategies for Natural Resources and the Environment , 2004 .

[14]  I. Spellerberg Ecological effects of roads and traffic: a literature review , 1998 .

[15]  A. P. Conolly,et al.  The distribution and history in the British Isles of some alien species of Polygonum and Reynoutria , 1977 .

[16]  D. Horvitz,et al.  A Generalization of Sampling Without Replacement from a Finite Universe , 1952 .