A redefinition of the representation of mammary cells and enzyme activities in a lactating dairy cow model.

The Molly model predicts various aspects of digestion and metabolism in the cow, including nutrient partitioning between milk and body stores. It has been observed previously that the model underpredicts milk component yield responses to nutrition and consequently overpredicts body energy store responses. In Molly, mammary enzyme activity is represented as an aggregate of mammary cell numbers and activity per cell with minimal endocrine regulation. Work by others suggests that mammary cells can cycle between active and quiescent states in response to various stimuli. Simple models of milk production have demonstrated the utility of this representation when using the model to simulate variable milking and nutrient restriction. It was hypothesized that replacing the current representation of mammary cells and enzyme activity in Molly with a representation of active and quiescent cells and improving the representation of endocrine control of cell activity would improve predictions of milk component yield. The static representation of cell numbers was replaced with a representation of cell growth during gestation and early lactation periods and first-order cell death. Enzyme capacity for fat and protein synthesis was assumed to be proportional to cell numbers. Enzyme capacity for lactose synthesis was represented with the same equation form as for cell numbers. Data used for parameter estimation were collected as part of an extended lactation trial. Cows with North American or New Zealand genotypes were fed 0, 3, or 6 kg of concentrate dry matter daily during a 600-d lactation. The original model had root mean square prediction errors of 17.7, 22.3, and 19.8% for lactose, protein, and fat yield, respectively, as compared with values of 8.3, 9.4, and 11.7% for the revised model, respectively. The original model predicted body weight with an error of 19.7% vs. 5.7% for the revised model. Based on these observations, it was concluded that representing mammary synthetic capacity as a function of active cell numbers and revisions to endocrine control of cell activity was meritorious.

[1]  Ermias Kebreab,et al.  Mathematical Modelling in Animal Nutrition , 2008 .

[2]  D. Keisler,et al.  Central infusion of leptin into well-fed and undernourished ewe lambs: effects on feed intake and serum concentrations of growth hormone and luteinizing hormone. , 2001, The Journal of endocrinology.

[3]  J. Hillers,et al.  Validation of indirect measures of body fat in lactating cows. , 1994, Journal of dairy science.

[4]  D Val-Arreola,et al.  Study of the lactation curve in dairy cattle on farms in central Mexico. , 2004, Journal of dairy science.

[5]  W. C. Kvaraceus,et al.  Principles and Practices , 2006 .

[6]  C. W. Holmes,et al.  Milk production from pasture. , 1987 .

[7]  J. Sutton,et al.  Milk production from grass silage diets: strategies for concentrate allocation , 1995 .

[8]  P. E. Kendall,et al.  Effect of photoperiod on hepatic growth hormone receptor 1A expression in steer calves. , 2003, Journal of animal science.

[9]  E. Kolver,et al.  Effects of genotype and diet on milksolids production, body condition, and reproduction of cows milked continuously for 600 days , 2006 .

[10]  D. A. Dwyer,et al.  Role of insulin in the regulation of mammary synthesis of fat and protein. , 1995, Journal of dairy science.

[11]  J. Mcnamara,et al.  Estimation of parameters describing lipid metabolism in lactation: challenge of existing knowledge described in a model of metabolism. , 2000, Journal of dairy science.

[12]  C. Knight,et al.  Endocrine profiles of cows undergoing extended lactation in relation to the control of lactation persistency. , 2002, Domestic animal endocrinology.

[13]  J France,et al.  Metabolism of the lactating cow: I. Animal elements of a mechanistic model , 1987, Journal of Dairy Research.

[14]  J. Nørgaard,et al.  Mammary cell turnover and enzyme activity in dairy cows: effects of milking frequency and diet energy density. , 2005, Journal of dairy science.

[15]  B. Chew,et al.  Arginine infusion stimulates prolactin, growth hormone, insulin, and subsequent lactation in pregnant dairy cows. , 1984, Journal of dairy science.

[16]  C. Mcmahon,et al.  Neuroregulation of growth hormone secretion in domestic animals. , 2001, Domestic animal endocrinology.

[17]  G. J. Asimov,et al.  The lactogenic preparations from the anterior pituitary and the increase of milk yield in cows. , 1937 .

[18]  G. Wake,et al.  Modeling the interaction of milking frequency and nutrition on mammary gland growth and lactation. , 2003, Journal of dairy science.

[19]  J. H. M. Thornley,et al.  The lactation curve in cattle: a mathematical model of the mammary gland , 1983, The Journal of Agricultural Science.

[20]  I Vetharaniam,et al.  Modeling the effect of energy status on mammary gland growth and lactation. , 2003, Journal of dairy science.

[21]  A. Pell,et al.  Evaluation of alternative equations for prediction of intake for Holstein dairy cows. , 1997, Journal of dairy science.

[22]  Ermias Kebreab,et al.  An ingredient-based input scheme for Molly , 2005 .

[23]  P. Hatfield,et al.  Effects of level of energy intake and energy demand on growth hormone, insulin, and metabolites in Targhee and Suffolk ewes. , 1999, Journal of animal science.

[24]  W. Hay,et al.  Placental transport of nutrients and its implications for fetal growth. , 2019, Journal of reproduction and fertility. Supplement.

[25]  J. Dijkstra,et al.  Nutrient Digestion and Utilization in Farm Animals , 2006 .

[26]  R. Pearson,et al.  Effects of Milking Frequency and Selection for Milk Yield on Productive Efficiency of Holstein Cows , 1990 .

[27]  G. Dahl,et al.  Management of photoperiod in the dairy herd for improved production and health. , 2003, Journal of animal science.

[28]  R. L. Baldwin,et al.  Modeling ruminant digestion and metabolism. , 1999, Advances in experimental medicine and biology.

[29]  M. Hanigan,et al.  Metabolic models of ruminant metabolism: recent improvements and current status. , 2006, Journal of dairy science.

[30]  J France,et al.  Metabolism of the lactating cow: III. Properties of mechanistic models suitable for evaluation of energetic relationships and factors involved in the partition of nutrients , 1987, Journal of Dairy Research.

[31]  D. Bauman,et al.  Response of somatomedins (IGF-I and IGF-II) in lactating cows to variations in dietary energy and protein and treatment with recombinant n-methionyl bovine somatotropin. , 1992, The Journal of nutrition.

[32]  R L Baldwin,et al.  Metabolism of the lactating cow: II. Digestive elements of a mechanistic model , 1987, Journal of Dairy Research.

[33]  Dorian J. Garrick,et al.  Milk production from pasture principles and practices , 2002 .

[34]  M. Lucy,et al.  Reduced insulin-like growth factor-I after acute feed restriction in lactating dairy cows is independent of changes in growth hormone receptor 1A mRNA. , 2002, Journal of dairy science.

[35]  M. Bonnet,et al.  Adipose tissue metabolism and its role in adaptations to undernutrition in ruminants , 2000, Proceedings of the Nutrition Society.

[36]  J France,et al.  A model to describe growth patterns of the mammary gland during pregnancy and lactation. , 1997, Journal of dairy science.

[37]  D. A. Dwyer,et al.  Nutritional modulation of the somatotropin/insulin-like growth factor system: response to feed deprivation in lactating cows. , 1995, The Journal of nutrition.