Perception and Recognition of Normal and Negative Faces: The Role of Shape from Shading and Pigmentation Cues

A face is surprisingly difficult to recognise when presented in photographic negative, and negation has also been shown to affect simple perceptual judgments about a face. Two possible explanations for this effect are examined. In the shape-from-shading explanation it is argued that negating an image results in an impossible pattern of shading, and that this disrupts the formation of a three-dimensional representation of the surface geometry of the face. In an alternative account for this effect it is suggested that identification errors occur as a consequence of changes to the apparent pigmentation of the face caused by negating the image. Three experiments are reported which are designed to test these explanations by using novel colour-image transformations in which the hue and luminance components of images are independently manipulated. The results of these studies suggest that although changes to the apparent pigmentation of a face might result in identification errors in some situations, the loss of shape-from-shading cues is a more important cause of the negation effect. The role of these two sources of information in the recognition of normal faces is also discussed.

[1]  Kirk Martinez,et al.  Computer Generated Cartoons , 1990 .

[2]  D.E. Pearson,et al.  Visual communication at very low data rates , 1985, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[3]  M C Morrone,et al.  Recognition of Positive and Negative Bandpass-Filtered Images , 1986, Perception.

[4]  T. Valentine Upside-down faces: a review of the effect of inversion upon face recognition. , 1988, British journal of psychology.

[5]  Andrew W. Ellis,et al.  Impaired Discrimination of Familiar from Unfamiliar Faces , 1993, Cortex.

[6]  A. M. Burton,et al.  Sex Discrimination: How Do We Tell the Difference between Male and Female Faces? , 1993, Perception.

[7]  S. Carey,et al.  Why faces are and are not special: an effect of expertise. , 1986, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[8]  N D Haig,et al.  The Effect of Feature Displacement on the Perception of Well-Known Faces , 1988, Perception.

[9]  A Johnston,et al.  Shape from Shading. I: Surface Curvature and Orientation , 1994, Perception.

[10]  V S Ramachandran,et al.  Perceiving shape from shading. , 1988, Scientific American.

[11]  C. McManus,et al.  Sensitivity to the Displacement of Facial Features in Negative and Inverted Images , 1990, Perception.

[12]  R. Galper,et al.  Recognition of faces in photographic negative , 1970 .

[13]  M. Livingstone Art, illusion and the visual system. , 1988, Scientific American.

[14]  R. Phillips Why are faces hard to recognize in photographic negative? , 1972 .

[15]  V Bruce,et al.  The Use of Pigmentation and Shading Information in Recognising the Sex and Identities of Faces , 1994, Perception.

[16]  Gordon Rae Table of A′ , 1976 .

[17]  A Hayes,et al.  Identification of Two-Tone Images; Some Implications for High- and Low-Spatial-Frequency Processes in Human Vision , 1988, Perception.

[18]  V. Bruce,et al.  The importance of ‘mass’ in line drawings of faces , 1992 .

[19]  John L. Bradshaw,et al.  Models for the processing and identification of faces , 1971 .

[20]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Shape from shadows. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[21]  A Johnston,et al.  Shape from Shading. II. Geodesic Bisection and Alignment , 1994, Perception.