Habitat heterogeneity as a determinant of mammal species richness in high-energy regions

A fundamental problem in ecological research is to explain large-scale gradients in species richness1,2. Although many causative agents for this phenomenon have been suggested, the species richness–energy hypothesis has received the strongest empirical support3–6: this hypothesis states that higher energy availability provides a broader resource base, permitting more species to coexist. Here we show that the species richness–energy hypothesis applies to North American mammals only over a limited geographical area in which climatic energy levels are low (Alaska and most of Canada), rather than on a continental scale as had previously been accepted6. In relatively high-energy regions of North America, corresponding to most of the continental United States and southern Canada, we find that mammal species richness is best predicted by topographic heterogeneity and local variation in energy availability. Our results contradict previous studies of large-scale richness patterns that dismissed the importance of habitat heterogeneity2,7–9, and have implications for climate change research.

[1]  M. Rosenzweig,et al.  Species Diversity in Space and Time , 1995 .

[2]  Eric R. Pianka,et al.  Geographical Trends in Numbers of Species , 1978, Science.

[3]  J. Turner,et al.  Does Solar Energy Control Organic Diversity? Butterflies, Moths and the British Climate , 1987 .

[4]  D. Currie.  Energy and Large-Scale Patterns of Animal- and Plant-Species Richness , 1991, The American Naturalist.

[5]  P. Klopfer.  Environmental Determinants of Faunal Diversity , 1959, The American Naturalist.

[6]  George Gaylord Simpson,et al.  Species Density of North American Recent Mammals , 1964 .

[7]  G. E. Hutchinson,et al.  Homage to Santa Rosalia or Why Are There So Many Kinds of Animals? , 1959, The American Naturalist.

[8]  H. G. Andrewartha,et al.  Introduction to the Study of Animal Populations , 1962 .

[9]  J. Connell,et al.  The Ecological Regulation of Species Diversity , 1964, The American Naturalist.

[10]  G. C. Stevens.  The Latitudinal Gradient in Geographical Range: How so Many Species Coexist in the Tropics , 1989, The American Naturalist.

[11]  Alfred Russel Wallace,et al.  Tropical nature, and other essays. By Alfred R. Wallace ... , 1878 .

[12]  K. Rohde.  Latitudinal gradients in species diversity: the search for the primary cause , 1992 .

[13]  F. Woodward,et al.  Patterns in tree species richness as a test of the glacial extinction hypothesis , 1989, Nature.

[14]  M. Huston.  A General Hypothesis of Species Diversity , 1979, The American Naturalist.

[15]  David H. Wright,et al.  Species-energy theory: an extension of species-area theory , 1983 .

[16]  A. Wallace.  Tropical Nature and Other Essays , 1972 .

[17]  C. Rahbek.  The elevational gradient of species richness: a uniform pattern? , 1995 .

[18]  David J. Currie,et al.  Large-scale biogeographical patterns of species richness of trees , 1987, Nature.

[19]  E. Pianka.  Latitudinal Gradients in Species Diversity: A Review of Concepts , 1966, The American Naturalist.

[20]  Jack J. Lennon,et al.  British bird species distributions and the energy theory , 1988, Nature.

[21]  John A. Wiens,et al.  Species diversity in ecological communities: edited by Robert E. Ricklefs and Dolph Schluter University of Chicago Press, 1993. $105.00 hbk, $35.00 pbk (414 pages) ISBN 0 226 71822 0/0 226 71823 9 , 1994 .