Symmetry perception by poultry chicks and its implications for three-dimensional object recognition

Bilateral symmetry is visually salient to diverse animals including birds, but whereas experimental studies typically use bilaterally symmetrical two-dimensional patterns that are viewed approximately fronto-parallel; in nature, animals observe three-dimensional objects from all angles. Many animals and plant structures have a plane of bilateral symmetry. Here, we first (experiment I) give evidence that young poultry chicks readily generalize bilateral symmetry as a feature of two-dimensional patterns in fronto-parallel view. We then test the ability of chicks to recognize symmetry in images that would be produced by the transformed view produced by a 40° horizontal combined with a 20° vertical rotation of a pattern on a spherical surface. Experiment II gives evidence that chicks trained to distinguish symmetrical from asymmetrical patterns treat rotated views of symmetrical ‘objects’ as symmetrical. Experiment III gives evidence that chicks trained to discriminate rotated views of symmetrical ‘objects’ from asymmetrical patterns generalize to novel symmetrical objects either in fronto-parallel or rotated view. These findings emphasize the importance of bilateral symmetry for three-dimensional object recognition and raise questions about the underlying mechanisms of symmetry perception.

[1]  D. Perrett,et al.  Evidence accumulation in cell populations responsive to faces: an account of generalisation of recognition without mental transformations , 1998, Cognition.

[2]  Rufus A. Johnstone,et al.  Generalization and the evolution of symmetry preferences , 1997, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[3]  P. A. van der Helm,et al.  Symmetry and repetition in perspective. , 2005, Acta psychologica.

[4]  R. Johnstone Female preference for symmetrical males as a by-product of selection for mate recognition , 1994, Nature.

[5]  R. Menzel,et al.  Symmetry perception in an insect , 1996, Nature.

[6]  M. Enquist,et al.  Experimental evidence of receiver bias for symmetry , 2002, Animal Behaviour.

[7]  L. Regolin,et al.  Preference for symmetry is experience dependent in newborn chicks (Gallus gallus). , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[8]  J. Saunders,et al.  Perception of 3D surface orientation from skew symmetry , 2001, Vision Research.

[9]  J. Wagemans Skewed symmetry: a nonaccidental property used to perceive visual forms. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[10]  Alicia M. Frame,et al.  A test of receiver perceptual performance: European starlings' ability to detect asymmetry in a naturalistic trait , 2008, Animal Behaviour.

[11]  I. Rock,et al.  Level of processing in the perception of symmetrical forms viewed from different angles. , 1995, Spatial vision.

[12]  Daniel Osorio,et al.  Symmetry detection by categorization of spatial phase, a model , 1996, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[13]  Martin Giurfa,et al.  Symmetry is in the eye of the ‘beeholder’: innate preference for bilateral symmetry in flower-naïve bumblebees , 2004, Naturwissenschaften.

[14]  Zygmunt Pizlo,et al.  A computational model that recovers the 3D shape of an object from a single 2D retinal representation , 2009, Vision Research.

[15]  Johan Wagemans,et al.  Higher-order structure in regularity detection , 1993, Vision Research.

[16]  Refractor Vision , 2000, The Lancet.

[17]  M. Wertheimer Laws of organization in perceptual forms. , 1938 .

[18]  Frédéric J A M Poirier,et al.  A biologically plausible model of human shape symmetry perception. , 2011, Journal of vision.

[19]  D. Burr,et al.  A feature–based model of symmetry detection , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[20]  M. Morris,et al.  Experience Plays a Role in Female Preference for Symmetry in the Swordtail Fish Xiphophorus malinche , 2009 .

[21]  George Adrian Horridge,et al.  The honeybee (Apis mellifera) detects bilateral symmetry and discriminates its axis , 1996 .

[22]  Zygmunt Pizlo,et al.  Camouflage and visual perception , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[23]  A. Møller,et al.  Female swallow preference for symmetrical male sexual ornaments , 1992, Nature.

[24]  Barbara Tversky,et al.  Three-Dimensional Bilateral Symmetry Bias in Judgments of Figural Identity and Orientation , 1997 .

[25]  Innes C. Cuthill,et al.  Preference for symmetric males by female zebra finches , 1994, Nature.

[26]  P. Schyns,et al.  Information and viewpoint dependence in face recognition , 1997, Cognition.

[27]  W. Köhler Gestalt psychology , 1967 .

[28]  Magnus Enquist,et al.  Symmetry, beauty and evolution , 1994, Nature.

[29]  R. Thornhill,et al.  Bilateral Symmetry and Sexual Selection: A Meta‐Analysis , 1998, The American Naturalist.

[30]  Anders Pape Møller,et al.  Fluctuating asymmetry in male sexual ornaments may reliably reveal male quality , 1990, Animal Behaviour.

[31]  Zygmunt Pizlo,et al.  New approach to the perception of 3D shape based on veridicality, complexity, symmetry and volume , 2010, Vision Research.

[32]  M. Zanforlin,et al.  Open-field behavior of young chicks (Gallus gallus): Antipredatory responses, social reinstatement motivation, and gender effects , 1988 .

[33]  K. Cheng,et al.  Flower Symmetry Preferences in Honeybees and their Crab Spider Predators , 2006 .

[34]  J D Delius,et al.  Symmetry: can pigeons conceptualize it? , 1978, Behavioral biology.