Development and validation of a clinical score to estimate the probability of coronary artery disease in men and women presenting with suspected coronary disease.

PURPOSE Guidelines for the management of patients with suspected coronary disease have emphasized stratification into groups with low, intermediate, and high probability of significant coronary disease. Previously derived clinical prediction rules have been difficult to apply in clinical settings. The purpose of this study was to develop and validate a clinical score that facilitates this stratification process. PATIENTS AND METHODS We performed a retrospective analysis of prospectively acquired data from 915 patients with suspected coronary disease and normal resting electrocardiograms who presented for exercise testing at a university hospital. All patients subsequently underwent coronary angiography. Analysis included logistic regression with significant coronary disease (> or = 1 vessel with a > or = 50% lesion) presence as the dependent variable and clinical variables as independent variables. From this analysis, a coronary disease score was developed to estimate prevalence of coronary disease from clinical variables. Validation of this score was performed in a separate prospectively acquired cohort of 348 patients. RESULTS For the entire validation group, the prevalence of significant coronary disease was 16% (10/63) in the low probability group, 44% (86/195) in the intermediate probability group, and 69% (62/90) in the high probability group. Both men and women were stratified equally well into the 3 probability groups. CONCLUSION The clinical score is an easily memorized and accurate method for categorizing patients with suspected but not proven coronary disease and normal resting electrocardiograms into clinically meaningful probability groups upon which decisions concerning appropriate diagnostic test selection could potentially be based.

[1]  G. Diamond,et al.  Computer-assisted diagnosis in the noninvasive evaluation of patients with suspected coronary artery disease. , 1983, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[2]  E F Cook,et al.  Prediction of the need for intensive care in patients who come to emergency departments with acute chest pain. , 1996, The New England journal of medicine.

[3]  E. Braunwald Unstable angina : diagnosis and management , 1994 .

[4]  G. Ginsburg,et al.  The evaluation of chest pain in women. , 1996, The New England journal of medicine.

[5]  M Bobbio,et al.  The Effect of Disease-prevalence Adjustments on the Accuracy of a Logistic Prediction Model , 1996, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[6]  George A. Diamond,et al.  Probabilistic diagnosis and prognosis of coronary artery disease , 1984 .

[7]  A. Morise,et al.  Value of a simple measure of estrogen status for improving the diagnosis of coronary artery disease in women. , 1993, The American journal of medicine.

[8]  V. Froelicher,et al.  Review of studies using multivariable analysis of clinical and exercise test data to predict angiographic coronary artery disease. , 1997, Progress in cardiovascular diseases.

[9]  J. Birkmeyer,et al.  Effect of coronary artery diameter in patients undergoing coronary bypass surgery. Northern New England Cardiovascular Disease Study Group. , 1996, Circulation.

[10]  G. Diamond A clinically relevant classification of chest discomfort. , 1983, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[11]  David J. Feild Guidelines for exercise testing. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Assessment of Cardiovascular Procedures (Subcommitte on Exercise Testing). , 1986, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[12]  M. Weiss,et al.  Effect of coronary artery size on the prevalence of atherosclerosis. , 1996, The American journal of cardiology.

[13]  G. Diamond,et al.  Exercise thallium-201 scintigraphy in the diagnosis and prognosis of coronary artery disease. , 1990, Annals of internal medicine.

[14]  D. Malenka,et al.  Differences between men and women in hospital mortality associated with coronary artery bypass graft surgery. The Northern New England Cardiovascular Disease Study Group. , 1993, Circulation.