Dissection of the NF-Y transcriptional activation potential

NF-Y is a trimeric CCAAT-binding factor with histone fold subunits (NF-YB/NF-YC) and bipartite activation domains located on NF-YA and NF-YC. We reconstituted the NF-Y activation potential in vivo with GAL4 DBD fusions. In the GAL4-YA configuration, activation requires co-expression of the three subunits; with GAL4-YB and GAL4-YC, transfections of the histone fold partners are sufficient, provided that the Q-rich domain of NF-YC is present. Combinations of mutants indicate that the Q-rich domains of NF-YA and NF-YC are redundant in the trimeric complex. Glutamines 101 and 102 of NF-YA are required for activity. We assayed NF-Y on different promoter targets, containing single or multiple GAL4 sites: whereas on a single site NF-Y is nearly as powerful as VP16, on multiple sites neither synergistic nor additive effects are observed. NF-Y activates TATA and Inr core elements and the overall potency is in the same range as other Q-rich and Pro-rich activation domains. These results represent the first in vivo evidence of subunit interactions studies and further support the hypothesis that NF-Y is a general promoter organizer rather than a brute activator.

[1]  S. Natori,et al.  Homologies of nucleotide sequences in the 5'-end regions of two developmentally regulated genes of Sarcophaga peregrina. , 1986, Nucleic Acids Research.

[2]  R. Roeder,et al.  The cell type‐specific octamer transcription factor OTF‐2 has two domains required for the activation of transcription. , 1990, The EMBO journal.

[3]  S. Sinha,et al.  The Transcriptional Activity of the CCAAT-binding Factor CBF Is Mediated by Two Distinct Activation Domains, One in the CBF-B Subunit and the Other in the CBF-C Subunit* , 1996, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[4]  M. Carey,et al.  A synergistic increase in potency of a multimerized VP16 transcriptional activation domain. , 1992, The EMBO journal.

[5]  D. McNabb,et al.  Cloning of yeast HAP5: a novel subunit of a heterotrimeric complex required for CCAAT binding. , 1995, Genes & development.

[6]  T. Richmond,et al.  Crystal structure of the nucleosome core particle at 2.8 Å resolution , 1997, Nature.

[7]  B. Crombrugghe,et al.  Role of the CCAAT-binding protein CBF/NF-Y in transcription. , 1998, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[8]  R. Mantovani,et al.  NF-Y binding to twin CCAAT boxes: role of Q-rich domains and histone fold helices. , 1999, Journal of molecular biology.

[9]  M. Meisterernst,et al.  A mechanism for repression of class II gene transcription through specific binding of NC2 to TBP‐promoter complexes via heterodimeric histone fold domains. , 1996, The EMBO journal.

[10]  R. Mantovani,et al.  A survey of 178 NF-Y binding CCAAT boxes. , 1998, Nucleic acids research.

[11]  K. Struhl,et al.  The glutamine-rich activation domains of human Sp1 do not stimulate transcription in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 1995, Molecular and cellular biology.

[12]  R. Tjian,et al.  Synergistic activation by the glutamine-rich domains of human transcription factor Sp1 , 1989, Cell.

[13]  R. Mantovani,et al.  Conservation and divergence of NF-Y transcriptional activation function. , 1998, Nucleic acids research.

[14]  C. Benoist,et al.  Intron-exon organization of the NF-Y genes. Tissue-specific splicing modifies an activation domain. , 1992, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[15]  S K Burley,et al.  Biochemistry and structural biology of transcription factor IID (TFIID). , 1996, Annual review of biochemistry.

[16]  B Velan,et al.  Functional Characteristics of the Oxyanion Hole in Human Acetylcholinesterase* , 1998, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[17]  D. Saluja,et al.  Distinct Subdomains of Human TAFII130 Are Required for Interactions with Glutamine-Rich Transcriptional Activators , 1998, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[18]  R. Tjian,et al.  Different activation domains of Sp1 govern formation of multimers and mediate transcriptional synergism. , 1991, Genes & development.

[19]  P. Chambon,et al.  The yeast UASG is a transcriptional enhancer in human hela cells in the presence of the GAL4 trans-activator , 1988, Cell.

[20]  S. Smale,et al.  Core promoter specificities of the Sp1 and VP16 transcriptional activation domains , 1995, Molecular and cellular biology.

[21]  R. Tjian,et al.  Analysis of the DNA-binding and activation properties of the human transcription factor AP-2. , 1991, Genes & development.

[22]  W. Herr,et al.  Differential transcriptional activation by Oct-1 and Oct-2: Interdependent activation domains induce Oct-2 phosphorylation , 1990, Cell.

[23]  P. Bucher.  Weight matrix descriptions of four eukaryotic RNA polymerase II promoter elements derived from 502 unrelated promoter sequences. , 1990, Journal of molecular biology.

[24]  F. Coustry,et al.  The two activation domains of the CCAAT-binding factor CBF interact with the dTAFII110 component of the Drosophila TFIID complex. , 1998, The Biochemical journal.

[25]  R. Mantovani,et al.  NF-Y Organizes the γ-Globin CCAAT Boxes Region* , 1998, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[26]  R. Tjian,et al.  Drosophila tissue-specific transcription factor NTF-1 contains a novel isoleucine-rich activation motif. , 1993, Genes & development.

[27]  M. Ptashne,et al.  Transcriptional activation by recruitment , 1997, Nature.

[28]  M. Künzler,et al.  Functional differences between mammalian transcription activation domains at the yeast GAL1 promoter. , 1994, The EMBO journal.

[29]  G. Braus,et al.  Three classes of mammalian transcription activation domain stimulate transcription in Schizosaccharomyces pombe , 1997, The EMBO journal.

[30]  W. Schaffner,et al.  Transcription factor Oct‐2A contains functionally redundant activating domains and works selectively from a promoter but not from a remote enhancer position in non‐lymphoid (HeLa) cells. , 1990, The EMBO journal.

[31]  R. Tjian,et al.  Analysis of Sp1 in vivo reveals mutiple transcriptional domains, including a novel glutamine-rich activation motif , 1988, Cell.