Leader–member exchange, shared values, and performance: Agreement and levels of analysis do matter

[1]  Francis J. Yammarino,et al.  Is more discussion about levels of analysis really necessary?When is such discussion sufficient? , 2006 .

[2]  Berrin Erdogan,et al.  A longitudinal study of the moderating role of extraversion: leader-member exchange, performance, and turnover during new executive development. , 2006, The Journal of applied psychology.

[3]  F. Couper.  Mutuality: Invaluable lessons from a classic model , 2006 .

[4]  Francis J. Yammarino,et al.  Leadership and levels of analysis: A state-of-the-science review , 2005 .

[5]  R. Hackett,et al.  Leader-Member Exchange as a Mediator of the Relationship Between Transformational Leadership and Followers' Performance and Organizational Citizenship Behavior , 2005 .

[6]  Berrin Erdogan,et al.  WORK VALUE CONGRUENCE AND INTRINSIC CAREER SUCCESS: THE COMPENSATORY ROLES OF LEADER-MEMBER EXCHANGE AND PERCEIVED ORGANIZATIONAL SUPPORT , 2004 .

[7]  Onne Janssen,et al.  Employees' goal orientations, the quality of leader-member exchange, and the outcomes of job performance and job satisfaction , 2004 .

[8]  D. Rousseau,et al.  Mutuality and reciprocity in the psychological contracts of employees and employers. , 2004, The Journal of applied psychology.

[9]  Suzanne Zivnuska,et al.  The interactive effect of leader-member exchange and communication frequency on performance ratings. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[10]  Mary Uhl-Bien,et al.  Reciprocity in Manager-Subordinate Relationships: Components, Configurations, and Outcomes , 2003 .

[11]  Mary Uhl-Bien,et al.  LMX and Subordinate Performance: The Moderating Effects of Task Characteristics , 2002 .

[12]  Steven E. Markham,et al.  Within- and between-entity analyses in multilevel research:: A leadership example using single level analyses and boundary conditions (MRA) , 2002 .

[13]  B. Minsky.  LMX dyad agreement: construct definition and the role of supervisor/subordinate similarity and communication in understanding LMX , 2002 .

[14]  Francis J. Yammarino,et al.  The folly of theorizing “A” but testing “B”: A selective level-of-analysis review of the field and a detailed Leader–Member Exchange illustration , 2001 .

[15]  M. Uhl‐Bien,et al.  Leader-member exchange and its dimensions: effects of self-effort and other's effort on relationship quality. , 2001, The Journal of applied psychology.

[16]  B. Avolio,et al.  Opening the black box: An experimental investigation of the mediating effects of trust and value congruence on transformational and transactional leadership. , 2000 .

[17]  Michael D. Mumford,et al.  Followers, motivations, and levels of analysis: The case of individualized leadership , 2000 .

[18]  C. Schriesheim,et al.  Leader–member exchange (LMX) research: A comprehensive review of theory, measurement, and data-analytic practices. , 1999 .

[19]  Jennifer J. Dose.  The Relationship between Work Values Similarity and Team–Member and Leader–Member Exchange Relationships , 1999 .

[20]  Chester A. Schriesheim,et al.  Delegation and Leader-Member Exchange: Main Effects, Moderators, and Measurement Issues , 1998 .

[21]  Ronald J. Deluga.  Leader-Member Exchange Quality and Effectiveness Ratings , 1998 .

[22]  Francis J. Yammarino,et al.  Multivariate aspects of the varient/waba approach: A discussion and leadership illustration , 1998 .

[23]  Daniel M. Cable,et al.  APPLICANT PERSONALITY, ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE, AND ORGANIZATION ATTRACTION , 1997 .

[24]  Francis J. Yammarino,et al.  Women and transformational and contingent reward leadership: A multiple-levels-of-analysis perspective. , 1997 .

[25]  Raymond T. Sparrowe,et al.  Leader-member exchange theory: The past and potential for the future. , 1997 .

[26]  Neal M. Ashkanasy,et al.  Value Congruence in Leader-Member Exchange , 1997 .

[27]  Charlotte R. Gerstner,et al.  Meta-Analytic Review of Leader-Member Exchange Theory: Correlates and Construct Issues , 1997 .

[28]  M. Koslowsky,et al.  Work values: A theoretical overview and a model of their effects , 1996 .

[29]  F. Dansereau.  A dyadic approach to leadership: Creating and nurturing this approach under fire , 1995 .

[30]  Thomas J. Naughton,et al.  Individualized leadership: A new multiple-level approach , 1995 .

[31]  G. Graen,et al.  Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective , 1995 .

[32]  Francis J. Yammarino,et al.  Leadership: The multiple-level approaches , 1995 .

[33]  Neville T. Duarte,et al.  Effects of Dyadic Quality and Duration on Performance Appraisal , 1994 .

[34]  Jeffrey R. Edwards,et al.  Problems with the use of profile similarity indices in the study of congruence in organizational research. , 1993 .

[35]  Robert C. Liden,et al.  A longitudinal study on the early development of leader-member exchanges. , 1993 .

[36]  Francis J. Yammarino,et al.  Superior-Subordinate Relationships: A Multiple Levels of Analysis Approach , 1992 .

[37]  Francis J. Yammarino,et al.  On the application of within and between analysis: Are absence and affect really group-based phenomena? , 1992 .

[38]  Francis J. Yammarino,et al.  DOES SELF‐OTHER AGREEMENT ON LEADERSHIP PERCEPTIONS MODERATE THE VALIDITY OF LEADERSHIP AND PERFORMANCE PREDICTIONS? , 1992 .

[39]  Steven E. Markham,et al.  Declining Organizational Size and Increasing Unemployment Rates: Predicting Employee Absenteeism from Within- And Between-Plant Perspectives , 1991 .

[40]  Jennifer A. Chatman,et al.  PEOPLE AND ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE: A PROFILE COMPARISON APPROACH TO ASSESSING PERSON-ORGANIZATION FIT , 1991 .

[41]  Jennifer A. Chatman.  Matching People and Organizations: Selection and Socialization in Public Accounting Firms , 1989 .

[42]  Cheryl L. Adkins,et al.  A work values approach to corporate culture: A field test of the value congruence process and its relationship to individual outcomes. , 1989 .

[43]  D. D. Steiner.  Value Perceptions in Leader-Member Exchange , 1988 .

[44]  Francis J. Yammarino,et al.  Theory testing in organizational behavior : the varient approach , 1987 .

[45]  G. Graen,et al.  Toward a psychology of dyadic organizing. , 1987 .

[46]  R. Liden,et al.  Leader-Member Exchange Model of Leadership: A Critique and Further Development , 1986 .

[47]  G. Graen,et al.  Moderating effects of initial leader–member exchange status on the effects of a leadership intervention. , 1984 .

[48]  George B. Graen,et al.  Role of leadership in the employee withdrawal process. , 1982 .

[49]  B. Kemelgor.  Job satisfaction as mediated by the value congruity of supervisors and their subordinates. , 1982 .

[50]  W. A. Schiemann,et al.  Leader–member agreement: A vertical dyad linkage approach. , 1978 .