Motor imagery during action observation modulates automatic imitation effects in rhythmical actions

We have previously shown that passively observing a task-irrelevant rhythmical action can bias the cycle time of a subsequently executed rhythmical action. Here we use the same paradigm to investigate the impact of different forms of motor imagery (MI) during action observation (AO) on this automatic imitation (AI) effect. Participants saw a picture of the instructed action followed by a rhythmical distractor movie, wherein cycle time was subtly manipulated across trials. They then executed the instructed rhythmical action. When participants imagined performing the instructed action in synchrony with the distractor action (AO + MI), a strong imitation bias was found that was significantly greater than in our previous study. The bias was pronounced equally for compatible and incompatible trials, wherein observed and imagined actions were different in type (e.g., face washing vs. painting) or plane of movement, or both. In contrast, no imitation bias was observed when MI conflicted with AO. In Experiment 2, motor execution synchronized with AO produced a stronger imitation bias compared to AO + MI, showing an advantage in synchronization for overt execution over MI. Furthermore, the bias was stronger when participants synchronized the instructed action with the distractor movie, compared to when they synchronized the distractor action with the distractor movie. Although we still observed a significant bias in the latter condition, this finding indicates a degree of specificity in AI effects for the identity of the synchronized action. Overall, our data show that MI can substantially modulate the effects of AO on subsequent execution, wherein: (1) combined AO + MI can enhance AI effects relative to passive AO; (2) observed and imagined actions can be flexibly coordinated across different action types and planes; and (3) conflicting AO + MI can abolish AI effects. Therefore, combined AO + MI instructions should be considered in motor training and rehabilitation.

[1]  M. Ziessler,et al.  Binding in voluntary action control , 2010, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[2]  Maarten J. IJzerman,et al.  Differential cortical activation during observation and observation-and-imagination , 2013, Experimental Brain Research.

[3]  R. C. Oldfield The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[4]  Bernhard Hommel,et al.  The Neural Underpinnings of Event-file Management: Evidence for Stimulus-induced Activation of and Competition among Stimulus–Response Bindings , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[5]  Y. Paulignan,et al.  An Interference Effect of Observed Biological Movement on Action , 2003, Current Biology.

[6]  W. Prinz,et al.  Movement observation affects movement execution in a simple response task. , 2001, Acta psychologica.

[7]  C. Collet,et al.  Autonomic nervous system correlates in movement observation and motor imagery , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[8]  R. Hardwick,et al.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation reveals modulation of corticospinal excitability when observing actions with the intention to imitate , 2012, The European journal of neuroscience.

[9]  S. G. Carmer,et al.  An Evaluation of Ten Pairwise Multiple Comparison Procedures by Monte Carlo Methods , 1973 .

[10]  A. Guillot,et al.  Imagining is Not Doing but Involves Specific Motor Commands: A Review of Experimental Data Related to Motor Inhibition , 2012, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[11]  A. Williams,et al.  What is modelled during observational learning? , 2007, Journal of sports sciences.

[12]  D. Kiper,et al.  Enhanced Activation of Motor Execution Networks Using Action Observation Combined with Imagination of Lower Limb Movements , 2013, PloS one.

[13]  M. Jeannerod Neural Simulation of Action: A Unifying Mechanism for Motor Cognition , 2001, NeuroImage.

[14]  T. Shipley,et al.  Influence of the perception of biological or non-biological motion on movement execution , 2007, Journal of sports sciences.

[15]  F. Baldissera,et al.  Cyclic time course of motor excitability modulation during the observation of a cyclic hand movement , 2005, Brain Research.

[16]  Simon B. Eickhoff,et al.  Imitation and observational learning of hand actions: Prefrontal involvement and connectivity , 2012, NeuroImage.

[17]  R. Shepard Ecological constraints on internal representation: resonant kinematics of perceiving, imagining, thinking, and dreaming. , 1984, Psychological review.

[18]  G Aschersleben,et al.  Correspondence effects with manual gestures and postures: a study of imitation. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[19]  A. Hamilton,et al.  Interference effect of observed human movement on action is due to velocity profile of biological motion , 2007, Social neuroscience.

[20]  J. Mazziotta,et al.  Modulation of cortical activity during different imitative behaviors. , 2003, Journal of neurophysiology.

[21]  M. Brass,et al.  Imitation: is cognitive neuroscience solving the correspondence problem? , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[22]  M. Schoenfeld,et al.  Action Imagery Combined With Action Observation Activates More Corticomotor Regions Than Action Observation Alone , 2012, Journal of neurologic physical therapy : JNPT.

[23]  Kristen L. Macuga,et al.  Neural representations involved in observed, imagined, and imitated actions are dissociable and hierarchically organized , 2012, NeuroImage.

[24]  C. Delpuech,et al.  Motor inhibition during motor imagery: A MEG study with a quadriplegic patient , 2014, Neurocase.

[25]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Neural Circuits Underlying Imitation Learning of Hand Actions An Event-Related fMRI Study , 2004, Neuron.

[26]  D. Wade,et al.  The effects of mental practice in neurological rehabilitation; a systematic review and meta-analysis , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[27]  W. Prinz,et al.  Compatibility between Observed and Executed Finger Movements: Comparing Symbolic, Spatial, and Imitative Cues , 2000, Brain and Cognition.

[28]  M. Jeannerod The representing brain: Neural correlates of motor intention and imagery , 1994, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[29]  P. Holmes,et al.  The PETTLEP Approach to Motor Imagery: A Functional Equivalence Model for Sport Psychologists , 2001 .

[30]  Aymeric Guillot,et al.  Multiple roles of motor imagery during action observation , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[31]  Stefan Vogt,et al.  Automatic Imitation in Rhythmical Actions: Kinematic Fidelity and the Effects of Compatibility, Delay, and Visual Monitoring , 2012, PloS one.

[32]  J. Kalaska,et al.  Neural mechanisms for interacting with a world full of action choices. , 2010, Annual review of neuroscience.

[33]  Michael J. Richardson,et al.  Movement Coordination or Movement Interference: Visual Tracking and Spontaneous Coordination Modulate Rhythmic Movement Interference , 2012, PloS one.

[34]  C. Heyes Imitation: Associative and Context Dependent , 2013 .

[35]  C. Hall,et al.  Further validation and development of the movement imagery questionnaire. , 2012, Journal of sport & exercise psychology.

[36]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  The functional role of the parieto-frontal mirror circuit: interpretations and misinterpretations , 2010, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[37]  S. Vogt,et al.  From visuo-motor interactions to imitation learning: Behavioural and brain imaging studies , 2007, Journal of sports sciences.

[38]  Michael J Richardson,et al.  Visual tracking and entrainment to an environmental rhythm. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[39]  Wolfgang Prinz,et al.  Action science: Foundations of an emerging discipline , 2013 .

[40]  C. Heyes Automatic imitation. , 2011, Psychological bulletin.

[41]  E. Poliakoff Representation of action in Parkinson's disease: imagining, observing, and naming actions. , 2013, Journal of neuropsychology.

[42]  Michael J. Richardson,et al.  Movement interference during action observation as emergent coordination , 2009, Neuroscience Letters.